×

Non-contextuality, finite precision measurement and the Kochen-Specker theorem. (English) Zbl 1222.81036

Summary: D. A. Meyer originally raised the question of whether non-contextual hidden variable models can, despite the Kochen-Specker theorem, simulate the predictions of quantum mechanics to within any fixed finite experimental precision [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, No. 19, 3751–3754 (1999; Zbl 0946.81009)]. Meyer’s result was extended by A. Kent [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, No. 19, 3755–3757 (1999; Zbl 0946.81010)]. R. Clifton and A. Kent later presented constructions of non-contextual hidden variable theories which, they argued, indeed simulate quantum mechanics in this way [Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 456, No. 2001, 2101–2114 (2000; Zbl 1079.81502)]. These arguments have evoked some controversy. Among other things, it has been suggested that the Clifton-Kent models do not in fact reproduce correctly the predictions of quantum mechanics, even when finite precision is taken into account. It has also been suggested that careful analysis of the notion of contextuality in the context of finite precision measurement motivates definitions which imply that the Clifton-Kent models are in fact contextual. Several critics have also argued that the issue can be definitively resolved by experimental tests of the Kochen-Specker theorem or experimental demonstrations of the contextuality of Nature.One aim of this paper is to respond to and rebut criticisms of the Meyer-Clifton-Kent papers. We thus elaborate in a little more detail how the Clifton-Kent models can reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics to arbitrary precision. We analyse in more detail the relationship between classicality, finite precision measurement and contextuality, and defend the claims that the Clifton-Kent models are both essentially classical and non-contextual. We also examine in more detail the senses in which a theory can be said to be contextual or non-contextual, and in which an experiment can be said to provide evidence on the point. In particular, we criticise the suggestion that a decisive experimental verification of contextuality is possible, arguing that the idea rests on a conceptual confusion.

MSC:

81P05 General and philosophical questions in quantum theory
81P15 Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI arXiv

References:

[1] Appleby, D. M. (2000). Contextuality of approximate measurements. E-print quant-ph/0005010.; Appleby, D. M. (2000). Contextuality of approximate measurements. E-print quant-ph/0005010.
[2] Appleby, D. M. (2001). Nullification of the nullification. E-print quant-ph/0109034.; Appleby, D. M. (2001). Nullification of the nullification. E-print quant-ph/0109034.
[3] Appleby, D. M., Existential contextuality and the models of Meyer, Kent and Clifton, Physical Review A, 65, 022105 (2002)
[4] Appleby, D. M. (2003). The Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem. E-print quant-ph/0308114.; Appleby, D. M. (2003). The Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem. E-print quant-ph/0308114.
[5] Basu, S.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Kar, G.; Home, D., Bell’s inequality for a single spin 1/2 particle and quantum contextuality, Physics Letters A, 279, 281-286 (2001) · Zbl 0972.81010
[6] Bell, J. S. (1966). On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics38Bell, 1987); Bell, J. S. (1966). On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics38Bell, 1987) · Zbl 0152.23605
[7] Bell, J. S. (1985). Free variables and local causality. Dialectica39Bell, 1987); Bell, J. S. (1985). Free variables and local causality. Dialectica39Bell, 1987)
[8] Bell, J. S., Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics (1987), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge · Zbl 1239.81001
[9] Boyle, C. F., & Schafir, R. L. (2001). Remarks on “Noncontextual hidden variables and physical measurements”. E-print quant-ph/0106040.; Boyle, C. F., & Schafir, R. L. (2001). Remarks on “Noncontextual hidden variables and physical measurements”. E-print quant-ph/0106040.
[10] Breuer, T., Kochen-Specker theorem for finite precision spin one measurements, Physical Review Letters, 88, 240402 (2002)
[11] Buhrman, H.; Cleve, R.; van Dam, W., Quantum entanglement and communication complexity, SIAM Journal on Computing, 30, 1829-1841 (2001) · Zbl 0980.68051
[12] Busch, P., Quantum states and generalized observablesA simple proof of Gleason’s theorem, Physical Review Letters, 91, 120403 (2003)
[13] Cabello, A. (1999). Comment on “Non-contextual hidden variables and physical measurements”. E-print quant-ph/9911024.; Cabello, A. (1999). Comment on “Non-contextual hidden variables and physical measurements”. E-print quant-ph/9911024.
[14] Cabello, A., Finite-precision measurement does not nullify the Kochen-Specker theorem, Physical Review A, 65, 052101 (2002)
[15] Cabello, A.; Estebaranz, J. M.; Garcı́a-Alcaine, G., Bell-Kochen-Specker theoremA proof with 18 vectors, Physics Letters A, 212, 183-187 (1996) · Zbl 1073.81515
[16] Cabello, A.; Garcı́a-Alcaine, G., Proposed experimental tests of the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem, Physical Review Letters, 80, 1797-1799 (1998) · Zbl 1369.81007
[17] Clauser, J. F.; Horne, M. A.; Shimony, A.; Holt, R. A., Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, Physical Review Letters, 23, 880-884 (1969) · Zbl 1371.81014
[18] Clifton, R.; Kent, A., Simulating quantum mechanics by non-contextual hidden variables, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A — Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 456, 2101-2114 (2000) · Zbl 1079.81502
[19] Conway, J., & Kochen, S.. Unpublished.; Conway, J., & Kochen, S.. Unpublished.
[20] Gleason, A., Measures on closed subspaces of Hilbert space, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 6, 885-893 (1957) · Zbl 0078.28803
[21] Godsil, C., & Zaks, J. (1988). Coloring the sphere. Research Report CORR 88-12, University of Waterloo.; Godsil, C., & Zaks, J. (1988). Coloring the sphere. Research Report CORR 88-12, University of Waterloo.
[22] Hasegawa, Y.; Loidl, R.; Badurek, G.; Baron, M.; Rauch, H., Violation of a Bell-like inequality in single-neutron interferometry, Nature, 425, 45-48 (2003)
[23] Havlicek, H.; Krenn, G.; Summhammer, J.; Svozil, K., Colouring the rational quantum sphere and the Kochen-Specker theorem, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34, 3071-3077 (2001) · Zbl 1168.81308
[24] Huang, Y.-F.; Li, C.-F.; Zhang, Y.-S.; Pan, J.-W.; Guo, G.-C., Experimental test of the Kochen-Specker theorem with single photons, Physical Review Letters, 90, 250401 (2003)
[25] Kent, A., Non-contextual hidden variables and physical measurements, Physical Review Letters, 83, 3755-3757 (1999) · Zbl 0946.81010
[26] Kent, A. (2002). Causal quantum theory and the collapse locality loophole. E-print quant-ph/0204104.; Kent, A. (2002). Causal quantum theory and the collapse locality loophole. E-print quant-ph/0204104.
[27] Kochen, S.; Specker, E., The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59-87 (1967) · Zbl 0156.23302
[28] Larsson, J.-Å., A Kochen-Specker inequality, Europhysics Letters, 58, 799-805 (2002)
[29] Mermin, N. D. (1999). A Kochen-Specker theorem for imprecisely specified measurement. E-print quant-ph/9912081.; Mermin, N. D. (1999). A Kochen-Specker theorem for imprecisely specified measurement. E-print quant-ph/9912081.
[30] Meyer, D. A., Finite precision measurement nullifies the Kochen-Specker theorem, Physical Review Letters, 83, 3751-3754 (1999) · Zbl 0946.81009
[31] Peres, A. (1995). Quantum theory: Concepts and methods; Peres, A. (1995). Quantum theory: Concepts and methods · Zbl 0867.00010
[32] Peres, A., What’s wrong with these observables?, Foundation of Physics, 33, 1543-1547 (2003)
[33] Peres, A. (2003b). Finite precision measurement nullifies Euclid’s postulates. E-print quant-ph/0310035.; Peres, A. (2003b). Finite precision measurement nullifies Euclid’s postulates. E-print quant-ph/0310035.
[34] Pitowsky, I. (1982a). Resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell paradoxes. Physical Review Letters48Pitowsky (1982b); Pitowsky, I. (1982a). Resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell paradoxes. Physical Review Letters48Pitowsky (1982b)
[35] Pitowsky, I., Resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell paradoxes—response, Physical Review Letters, 49, 1216-1216 (1982)
[36] Pitowsky, I., Deterministic model of spin and statistics, Physical Review D, 27, 2316-2326 (1983)
[37] Pitowsky, I., Quantum mechanics and value definiteness, Philosophy of Science, 52, 154-156 (1985)
[38] Simon, C.; Brukner, C.; Zeilinger, A., Hidden variable theorems for real experiments, Physical Review Letters, 86, 4427-4430 (2001)
[39] Simon, C.; Żukowski, M.; Weinfurter, H.; Zeilinger, A., Feasible “Kochen-Specker” experiment with single particles, Physical Review Letters, 85, 1783-1786 (2000) · Zbl 1369.81008
[40] Specker, E., Die Logik nicht gleichzeitig entscheidbarer aussagen, Dialectica, 14, 239-246 (1960)
[41] van Fraassen, B. (1973). Semantic analysis of quantum logic. In C. Hooker (Ed.), Contemporary research in the foundations and philosophy of quantum theory; van Fraassen, B. (1973). Semantic analysis of quantum logic. In C. Hooker (Ed.), Contemporary research in the foundations and philosophy of quantum theory · Zbl 0279.02016
[42] Zimba, J.; Penrose, R., On Bell non-locality without probabilitiesMore curious geometry, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 24, 697-720 (1993) · Zbl 0943.81501
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.