×

A comparison of the Lee-Carter model and AR-ARCH model for forecasting mortality rates. (English) Zbl 1235.91089

Summary: With the decline in the mortality level of populations, national social security systems and insurance companies of most developed countries are reconsidering their mortality tables taking into account the longevity risk. The Lee and Carter model is the first discrete-time stochastic model to consider the increased life expectancy trends in mortality rates and is still broadly used today. In this paper, we propose an alternative to the Lee-Carter model: an AR(1)-ARCH(1) model. More specifically, we compare the performance of these two models with respect to forecasting age-specific mortality in Italy. We fit the two models, with Gaussian and t-student innovations, for the matrix of Italian death rates from 1960 to 2003. We compare the forecast ability of the two approaches in out-of-sample analysis for the period 2004–2006 and find that the AR(1)-ARCH(1) model with t-student innovations provides the best fit among the models studied in this paper.

MSC:

91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)
62P05 Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics

Software:

LifeMetrics
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Alho, J.M., Stochastic methods in population forecasting, International journal of forecasting, 6, 521-530, (1990)
[2] Ballotta, L.; Haberman, S., The fair valuation problem of guaranteed annuity options: the stochastic mortality environment case, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 38, 195-221, (2006) · Zbl 1101.60045
[3] Coale, A.; Guo, G., Revised regional model life tables at very low levels of mortality, Population index, 55, 613-643, (1989)
[4] Deaton, A., Paxson, C., 2004. Mortality, income, and income inequality over time in Britain and the United States. Technical Report No. 8534. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA.
[5] Denuit, M.M., An index for longevity risk transfer, Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 230, 411-417, (2009) · Zbl 1173.91443
[6] Giacometti, R.; Ortobelli, S.; Bertocchi, M., Impact of different distributional assumptions in forecasting Italian mortality, Investment management and financial innovations, 3, 65-72, (2009)
[7] Giacometti, R.; Ortobelli, S.; Bertocchi, M., A stochastic model for mortality rates on Italian data, Journal of optimization theory and applications, 149, 216-223, (2011) · Zbl 1221.91031
[8] Girosi, F., King, G., 2007. Understanding the Lee-Carter mortality forecasting method. Technical Report. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
[9] Guralnik, J.M.; Yanagishita, M.; Schneider, E.L., Projecting the older population of the united states: lessons from the past and prospects for the future, The milbank quarterly, 66, 283-308, (1988)
[10] Heligman, L., Construction of the new united nations model life table system, (), 179-202
[11] Lee, R.D.; Carter, L.R., Modeling and forecasting US mortality, Journal of the American statistical association, 87, 659-671, (1992) · Zbl 1351.62186
[12] Lee, R.D., The lee – carter method for forecasting mortality, with various extensions and applications, North American actuarial journal, 4, 80-93, (2000) · Zbl 1083.62535
[13] Lee, R.D., Miller, T., 2000. Assessing the performance of the Lee-Carter approach to modeling and forecasting mortality. Available at: www.demog.berkeley.edu.
[14] LifeMetrics, 2007. A toolkit for measuring and managing longevity and mortality risks. Technical Report.
[15] Milevsky, M.A.; Promislow, S.D., Mortality derivatives and the option to annuitise, Insurance: mathematics and economics, 29, 299-318, (2001) · Zbl 1074.62530
[16] Tuljapurkar, S.; Li, N.; Boe, C., A universal pattern of mortality decline in the G7 countries, Nature, 405, 789-792, (2000)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.