Effect of base-flow variation in noise amplifiers: the flat-plate boundary layer. (English) Zbl 1241.76340

Summary: Non-modal analysis determines the potential for energy amplification in stable flows. The latter is quantified in the frequency domain by the singular values of the resolvent operator. The present work extends previous analysis on the effect of base-flow modifications on flow stability by considering the sensitivity of the flow non-modal behaviour. Using a variational technique, we derive an analytical expression for the gradient of a singular value with respect to base-flow modifications and show how it depends on the singular vectors of the resolvent operator, also denoted the optimal forcing and optimal response of the flow. As an application, we examine zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers where the different instability mechanisms of wall-bounded shear flows are all at work. The effect of the component-type non-normality of the linearized Navier-Stokes operator, which concentrates the optimal forcing and response on different components, is first studied in the case of a parallel boundary layer. The effect of the convective-type non-normality of the linearized Navier-Stokes operator, which separates the spatial support of the structures of the optimal forcing and response, is studied in the case of a spatially evolving boundary layer. The results clearly indicate that base-flow modifications have a strong impact on the Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) instability mechanism whereas the amplification of streamwise streaks is a very robust process. This is explained by simply examining the expression for the gradient of the resolvent norm. It is shown that the sensitive region of the lift-up (LU) instability spreads out all over the flat plate and even upstream of it, whereas it is reduced to the region between branch I and branch II for the TS waves.


76N25 Flow control and optimization for compressible fluids and gas dynamics
76Q05 Hydro- and aero-acoustics
76N20 Boundary-layer theory for compressible fluids and gas dynamics
Full Text: DOI Link


[1] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112009993703 · Zbl 1189.76192
[2] DOI: 10.1023/A:1011434805046 · Zbl 1094.76513
[3] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112008004023 · Zbl 1165.76337
[4] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112004000011 · Zbl 1107.76032
[5] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112005003800 · Zbl 1070.76024
[6] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112080000122 · Zbl 0428.76049
[7] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112005004295 · Zbl 1074.76016
[8] DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511524608.004
[9] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175810 · Zbl 1117.76027
[10] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112078002918 · Zbl 0383.76031
[11] DOI: 10.1016/S0997-7546(00)00128-X · Zbl 0966.76019
[12] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112007005654 · Zbl 1115.76028
[13] DOI: 10.1063/1.858386
[14] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112004000825 · Zbl 1131.76327
[15] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112004000941 · Zbl 1131.76326
[16] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<2025:GSTPIA>2.0.CO;2
[17] DOI: 10.1063/1.866609
[18] DOI: 10.1017/S002211200200318X · Zbl 1041.76029
[19] DOI: 10.1063/1.870287 · Zbl 1149.76349
[20] Blackburn, J. Fluid Mech. 608 pp 271– (2008)
[21] Chomaz, Stud. Appl. Maths 84 pp 119– (1991) · Zbl 0716.76041
[22] DOI: 10.1002/fld.1824 · Zbl 1144.76044
[23] DOI: 10.1063/1.3153908 · Zbl 1183.76070
[24] DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2007.09.004 · Zbl 1147.76025
[25] DOI: 10.1145/365723.365727
[26] DOI: 10.1115/1.4001478
[27] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112010000376 · Zbl 1193.76057
[28] DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0185-1 · Zbl 0966.76003
[29] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112093003738 · Zbl 0789.76026
[30] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112009993764 · Zbl 1189.76216
[31] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112008003662 · Zbl 1165.76012
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.