Optimal risk transfers in insurance groups. (English) Zbl 1270.91028

Summary: Optimal risk transfers are derived within an insurance group consisting of two separate legal entities, operating under potentially different regulatory capital requirements and capital costs. Consistent with regulatory practice, capital requirements for each entity are computed by either a value-at-risk or an expected shortfall risk measure. The optimality criterion consists of minimising the risk-adjusted value of the total group liabilities, with valuation carried out using a cost-of-capital approach. The optimisation problems are analytically solved and it is seen that optimal risk transfers often involve the transfer of tail risk (unlimited reinsurance layers) to the more weakly regulated entity. We show that, in the absence of a capital requirement for the credit risk that specifically arises from the risk transfer, optimal risk transfers achieve capital efficiency at the cost of increasing policyholder deficit. However, when credit risk is properly reflected in the capital requirement, incentives for tail-risk transfers vanish and policyholder welfare is restored.


91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)
90C90 Applications of mathematical programming
Full Text: DOI Link


[1] Acerbi C, Tasche D (2002) On the coherence of expected shortfall. J Bank Finance 26(7):1487–1503
[2] Albrecher H, Thonhauser S (2009) Optimality results for dividend problems in insurance. RACSAM Rev R Acad Cien Ser A Mat 103(2):295–320 · Zbl 1187.93138
[3] Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 53(5):941–973
[4] Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9:203–228 · Zbl 0980.91042
[5] Bernard C, Tian W (2010) Insurance market effects of risk management metrics. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 35:47–80
[6] Borch K (1960) An attempt to determine the optimum amount of stop loss reinsurance. Trans 16th Int Cong Actuar I:597–610
[7] Cai J, Tan KS, Weng C, Zhang Y (2008) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures. Insur Math Econ 43(1):185–196 · Zbl 1140.91417
[8] Carlier G, Dana R-A (2003) Pareto efficient insurance contracts when the insurer’s cost function is discontinuous. Econ Theory 21(4):871–893 · Zbl 1060.91075
[9] Centeno ML, Guerra M (2010) The optimal reinsurance strategy–the individual claim case. Insur Math Econ 46(3):450–460 · Zbl 1231.91151
[10] Cheung KC (2010) Optimal reinsurer revisited–a geometric approach. Astin Bull 40(1):221–239 · Zbl 1230.91070
[11] Chi Y, Tan KS (2011) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CVaR risk measures: a simplified approach. Astin Bull 42(1):487–509 · Zbl 1239.91078
[12] Denuit M, Dhaene J, Goovaerts M, Kaas R (2005) Actuarial theory for dependent risks: measures, orders and models. Wiley, Chichester
[13] Dowd K, Blake D (2006) After VaR: the theory, estimation, and insurance applications of quantile-based risk measures. J Risk Insur 73(2):193–229 · Zbl 1375.91245
[14] Embrechts P, Hofert M (2010) A note on generalized inverses (Preprint). · Zbl 1281.60014
[15] EIOPA: (2011). ”Equivalence Assessment of the Swiss Supervisory System in Relation to Articles 172, 227 and 260 of the Solvency II Directive”, EIOPA-BoS-11-028. https://eiopa.europa.eu/consultations/consultation-papers/index.html .
[16] EIOPA (2009) Advice for level 2 implementing measures on solvency II: supervision of risk concentration and intra-group transactions, CEIOPS-DOC-53/09. https://eiopa.europa.eu/consultations/consultation-papers/2010-2009-closed-consultations/index.html .
[17] European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance (Solvency II). Off J Eur Union, L335.
[18] Federal Office of Private Insurance: 2006. The Swiss experience with market consistent technical provisions–the cost of capital approach. http://www.finma.ch/archiv/bpv/e/themen/00506/00552/00727/index.html .
[19] Filipović D, Kupper M (2008) Optimal capital and risk transfers for group diversification. Math Finance 18:55–76 · Zbl 1138.91496
[20] Gatzert N, Schmeiser H (2011) On the risk situation of financial conglomerates: does diversification matter? Financial Mark Portfolio Manag 25:3–26
[21] Guerra M, Centeno ML (2008) Optimal reinsurance policy: the adjustment coefficient and the expected utility criteria. Insur Math Econ 42(2):529–539 · Zbl 1152.91583
[22] Guerra M, Centeno ML (2010) Optimal reinsurance for variance related premium calculation principles. Astin Bull 40(1):97–121 · Zbl 1230.91073
[23] Van Heerwaarden AE, Kaas R, Goovaerts MJ (1989) Optimal reinsurer in the relation to ordering of risk. Insur Math Econ 8(1):11–17 · Zbl 0683.62060
[24] Hipp C, Vogt M (2003) Optimal dynamic XL reinsurance. Astin Bull 33(2):193–207 · Zbl 1059.93135
[25] Hürlimann V (2003) Conditional value-at-risk bounds for compound Poisson risks and a normal approximation. J Appl Math 3:141–153 · Zbl 1012.62110
[26] Kaluszka M (2001) Optimal reinsurance under mean-variance premium principles. Insur Math Econ 28(1):61–67 · Zbl 1009.62096
[27] Kaluszka M (2005) Truncated stop loss as optimal reinsurance agreement in one-period models. Astin Bull 35(2):337–349 · Zbl 1156.62363
[28] Kaluszka M, Okolewski A (2008) An extension of Arrow’s result on optimal reinsurance contract. J Risk Insur 75(2):275–288
[29] Keller P (2007) Group diversification. Geneva Pap 38:382–392
[30] Landsberger M, Meilijson II (1994) Comonotone allocations, Bickel Lehmann dispersion and the Arrow–Pratt measure of risk aversion. Ann Oper Res 52:97–106 · Zbl 0812.90028
[31] Ludkovski M, Young VR (2009) Optimal risk sharing under distorted probabilities. Math Financial Econ 2(2):87–105 · Zbl 1255.91182
[32] Myers SC, Read JA Jr (2001) Capital allocation for insurance companies. J Risk Insur 68(4):545–580
[33] Phillips RD, Cummins JD, Allen F (1998) Financial pricing of insurance in the multiple-line insurance company. J Risk Insur 65(4):597–636
[34] Schmidli H (2001) Optimal proportional reinsurance policies in a dynamic setting. Scand Actuar J 1:55–68 · Zbl 0971.91039
[35] Schmidli H (2002) On minimizing the ruin probability by investment and reinsurance. Ann Probab 12(3):890–907 · Zbl 1021.60061
[36] Schlütter S, Gründl H (2011) Who benefits from buildiung insurance groups? A welfare analysis based on optimal group risk management. ICIR working paper series Nr. 8. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main
[37] Verlaak R, Beirlant J (2003) Optimal reinsurance programs: an optimal combination of several reinsurance protections on a heterogeneous insurance Portfolio. Insur Math Econ 33(2):381–403 · Zbl 1103.91376
[38] Wüthrich MV, Bühlmann H, Furrer H (2010) Market-consistent actuarial valuation, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin · Zbl 1203.91005
[39] Young VR (1999) Optimal insurance under Wang’s premium principle. Insur Math Econ 25(2):109–122 · Zbl 1156.62364
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.