##
**Analytical optimal designs for long and short statically determinate beam structures.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1274.74157

Summary: Analytical solutions for optimal beam design may serve as benchmarks for numerical studies and for basic understanding. The influence of load case, of boundary conditions and of cross sectional type is severe, so many cases are studied. Short beams based on Timoshenko theory are included in the present energy approach. With a given amount of material/volume the objective is to minimize compliance, and the necessary optimality criterion is to obtain the same gradient of elastic energy along the beam axis \(x\), i.e., for all volumes \(A(x)dx\), where the design function is the area \(A(x)\). The beams considered in the paper are geometrically unconstrained, i.e., no minimum and/or maximum constraints are specified for the variable cross sectional area function \(A(x)\) other than the volume constraint. The obtained explicitly described designs may be used for comparison with obtained distribution of volume densities for two and three dimensional numerical models, or in the sense of topology optimization for the distribution of the number of active design pixels/voxels. Also the presented decrease in compliance, relative to compliance for uniform beam design, show how much it is possible to obtain for these optimal compliance designs of statically determinate cases.

### MSC:

74K10 | Rods (beams, columns, shafts, arches, rings, etc.) |

74P05 | Compliance or weight optimization in solid mechanics |

### Keywords:

optimal designs; optimality criteria; Timoshenko beams; analytical approach; compliance; elastic energy
PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{P. Pedersen} and \textit{N. L. Pedersen}, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 39, No. 4, 343--357 (2010; Zbl 1274.74157)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | BendsĂ¸e MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization–theory, methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, 370 p |

[2] | Huang NC (1968) Optimal design of elastic structures for maximum stiffness. Int J Solids Struct 4:689–700 |

[3] | Mai SP, Fleck NA, Lu TJ (2007) Optimal design of box-section sandwich beams in three-point bending. Int J Solids Struct 44:4742–4769 · Zbl 1166.74401 |

[4] | Masur EF (1970) Optimum stiffness and strength of elastic structures. J Eng Mech Div ASCE EM5:621–649 |

[5] | Olhoff N (1980) Optimal design with respect to structural eigenvalues. In: Rimrott FPJ, Tabarrot B (eds) IUTAM congress. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 133–149 · Zbl 0457.73078 |

[6] | Olhoff N, Niordson FI (1979) Some problems concerning singularities of optimal beams and columns. Z Angew Math Mech 59:T16–T26 · Zbl 0411.73033 |

[7] | Olhoff N, Taylor JE (1983) On structural optimization. J Appl Mech 50:1139–1151 (58 references) · Zbl 0526.73090 |

[8] | Pedersen P, Pedersen NL (2006) On modeling and optimal design of beam/bridge structures. Fund Civil Environ Eng 7:273–291 |

[9] | Rozvany GNI (1989) Structural design via optimality criteria. Kluwer, Dordrecht · Zbl 0687.73079 |

[10] | Save M, Prager W, Sacchi G (1985) Structural optimization, optimality criteria, vol 1. Plenum, New York · Zbl 0649.73042 |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.