×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Bayesian inference and prediction of the inverse Weibull distribution for type-II censored data. (English) Zbl 1284.62604
Summary: This paper describes the Bayesian inference and prediction of the inverse Weibull distribution for type-II censored data. First we consider the Bayesian inference of the unknown parameter under a squared error loss function. Although we have discussed mainly the squared error loss function, any other loss function can easily be considered. A Gibbs sampling procedure is used to draw Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples, and they have in turn, been used to compute the Bayes estimates and also to construct the corresponding credible intervals with the help of an importance sampling technique. We have performed a simulation study in order to compare the proposed Bayes estimators with the maximum likelihood estimators. We further consider one-sample and two-sample Bayes prediction problems based on the observed sample and provide appropriate predictive intervals with a given coverage probability. A real life data set is used to illustrate the results derived. Some open problems are indicated for further research.

MSC:
62N01 Censored data models
62F15 Bayesian inference
PDF BibTeX Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Aarset, M.V., How to identify a bathtub hazard function, IEEE transactions on reliability, 36, 106-108, (1987) · Zbl 0625.62092
[2] Al-Hussaini, E.K., Predicting observables from a general class of distributions, Journal of statistical planning and inference, 79, 79-91, (1999) · Zbl 0933.62018
[3] Bennette, S., Log-logistic regression models for survival data, Applied statistics, 32, 165-171, (1983)
[4] Bjerkedal, T., Acquisition of resistance in guinea pigs infected with different doses of virulent tubercle bacilli, American journal of hygiene, 72, 130-148, (1960)
[5] Calabria, R.; Pulcini, G., Bayesian 2-sample prediction for the inverse Weibull distribution, Communications in statistics—theory and methods, 23, 1811-1824, (1994) · Zbl 0825.62167
[6] Chen, M.-H.; Shao, Q.-M., Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals, Journal of computational and graphical statistics, 8, 1, 69-92, (1999)
[7] Chen, M.-H.; Shao, Q.-M.; Ibrahim, J.G., Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian computation, (2000), Springer-Verlag New York · Zbl 0949.65005
[8] Devroye, L., A simple algorithm for generating random variates with a log-concave density function, Computing, 33, 247-257, (1984) · Zbl 0561.65004
[9] Erto, P.; Rapone, M., Non-informative and practical Bayesian confidence bounds for reliable life in the Weibull model, Reliability engineering, 7, 181-191, (1984)
[10] Johnson, R.; Kotz, S.; Balakrishnan, N., Continuous univariate distribution, (1995), Wiley and Sons New York
[11] Kundu, D., Bayesian inference and reliability sampling plan for Weibull distribution, Technometrics, 50, 2, 144-154, (2008)
[12] Langlands, A.O.; Pocock, S.J.; Kerr, G.R.; Gore, S.M., Long term survival of patients with breast cancer: A study of curability of the disease, British medical journal, 1247-1251, (1979)
[13] Lindley, D.V., Approximate Bayes method, Trabajos de estadistica, 31, 223-237, (1980)
[14] Murthy, D.N.P.; Xie, M.; Jiang, R., Weibull models, (2004), Wiley New York
[15] Nelson, W., Applied lifetime data analysis, (1982), Wiley New York
[16] Nordman, D.; Meeker, W.Q., Weibull prediction intervals for a future number of failures, Technometrics, 44, 15-23, (2002)
[17] Prentice, R.L., Exponential survivals with censoring and explanatory variables, Biometrika, 60, 279-288, (1973) · Zbl 0267.62010
[18] Press, W.H.; Flannery, B.P.; Teukolsky, S.A.; Vetterling, W.T., Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, (1991), Cambridge University Press UK
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.