Mock theta functions and quantum modular forms.(English)Zbl 1294.11083

Summary: Ramanujan’s last letter to Hardy concerns the asymptotic properties of modular forms and his ’mock theta functions’. For the mock theta function $$f(q)$$, Ramanujan claims that as $$q$$ approaches an even-order $$2k$$ root of unity, we have $f(q) - (-1)^k(1 - q)(1 - q^3)(1 - q^5)\cdots(1 - 2q + 2q^4 - \cdots) = O(1).$ We prove Ramanujan’s claim as a special case of a more general result. The implied constants in Ramanujan’s claim are not mysterious. They arise in Zagier’s theory of ’quantum modular forms’. We provide explicit closed expressions for these ’radial limits’ as values of a ’quantum’ $$q$$-hypergeometric function which underlies a new relationship between Dyson’s rank mock theta function and the Andrews-Garvan crank modular form. Along these lines, we show that the Rogers-Fine false $$\vartheta$$-functions, functions which have not been well understood within the theory of modular forms, specialize to quantum modular forms.

MSC:

 11F99 Discontinuous groups and automorphic forms 11F37 Forms of half-integer weight; nonholomorphic modular forms 33D15 Basic hypergeometric functions in one variable, $${}_r\phi_s$$
Full Text:

References:

 [1] DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9939-2012-11439-X · Zbl 1277.11035 [2] DOI: 10.1090/S0273-0979-1988-15637-6 · Zbl 0646.10008 [3] Zagier, Quanta of Maths: Conference in Honor of Alain Connes 11 pp 659– (2010) [4] Andrews, Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook. Part II (2009) · Zbl 1180.11001 [5] DOI: 10.1016/S0040-9383(00)00005-7 · Zbl 0989.57009 [6] Andrews, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 55 pp 18– (2008) [7] DOI: 10.1112/jlms/s1-11.1.55 · Zbl 0013.11502 [8] DOI: 10.2307/2373202 [9] DOI: 10.1007/s00220-004-1046-2 · Zbl 1060.57011 [10] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300345110 · Zbl 1295.11038 [11] DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0028-8_9 · Zbl 1246.33006 [12] Gasper, Basic Hypergeometric Series 35 (1990) · Zbl 0695.33001 [13] Fine, Basic Hypergeometric Series and Applications 27 (1988) · Zbl 0647.05004 [14] Dyson, Eureka 8 pp 10– (1944) [15] DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1952-0049927-8 [16] DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9939-02-06649-2 · Zbl 1082.11011 [17] DOI: 10.1007/s11139-010-9269-7 · Zbl 1225.33019 [18] Rogers, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 16 pp 315– (1917) [19] DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-80615-5 [20] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506702102 · Zbl 1155.11350 [21] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1131697100 · Zbl 1070.33016 [22] Lawrence, Asian J. Math. 3 pp 93– (1999) · Zbl 1024.11028 [23] DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1741-9 [24] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211964109 [25] DOI: 10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12513-8 · Zbl 1088.11030 [26] DOI: 10.1090/S0894-0347-07-00587-5 · Zbl 1208.11065 [27] DOI: 10.4007/annals.2010.171.419 · Zbl 1277.11096 [28] DOI: 10.1112/plms/s3-4.1.84 · Zbl 0055.03805 [29] DOI: 10.1007/s00222-005-0493-5 · Zbl 1135.11057 [30] DOI: 10.1090/conm/291/04907 [31] DOI: 10.1215/S0012-7094-01-10831-4 · Zbl 1005.11048 [32] Bringmann, Ramanujan’s 125th Anniversary Special Volume 29 pp 295– (2012) [33] Berndt, Ramanujan: Letters and Commentary (1995)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.