Fragility in dynamic networks: application to neural networks in the epileptic cortex. (English) Zbl 1305.92020

Summary: Epilepsy is a network phenomenon characterized by atypical activity at the neuronal and population levels during seizures, including tonic spiking, increased heterogeneity in spiking rates, and synchronization. The etiology of epilepsy is unclear, but a common theme among proposed mechanisms is that structural connectivity between neurons is altered. It is hypothesized that epilepsy arises not from random changes in connectivity, but from specific structural changes to the most fragile nodes or neurons in the network. In this letter, the minimum energy perturbation on functional connectivity required to destabilize linear networks is derived. Perturbation results are then applied to a probabilistic nonlinear neural network model that operates at a stable fixed point. That is, if a small stimulus is applied to the network, the activation probabilities of each neuron respond transiently but eventually recover to their baseline values. When the perturbed network is destabilized, the activation probabilities shift to larger or smaller values or oscillate when a small stimulus is applied. Finally, the structural modifications to the neural network that achieve the functional perturbation are derived. Simulations of the unperturbed and perturbed networks qualitatively reflect neuronal activity observed in epilepsy patients, suggesting that the changes in network dynamics due to destabilizing perturbations, including the emergence of an unstable manifold or a stable limit cycle, may be indicative of neuronal or population dynamics during seizure. That is, the epileptic cortex is always on the brink of instability and minute changes in the synaptic weights associated with the most fragile node can suddenly destabilize the network to cause seizures. Finally, the theory developed here and its interpretation of epileptic networks enables the design of a straightforward feedback controller that first detects when the network has destabilized and then applies linear state feedback control to steer the network back to its stable state.


92B25 Biological rhythms and synchronization
92C50 Medical applications (general)
Full Text: DOI


[1] DOI: 10.1053/seiz.2000.0458
[2] DOI: 10.1126/science.1067859
[3] DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000846
[4] DOI: 10.1016/0301-0082(95)00030-5
[5] DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347012
[6] DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.12.019
[7] DOI: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1807
[8] DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1239-10.2010
[9] DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000532
[10] DOI: 10.1021/j100540a008
[11] DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.03.004 · Zbl 1432.60075
[12] DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh184
[13] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.010302.081210
[14] DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4361-05.2006
[15] DOI: 10.1177/1073858411422754
[16] DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6309-09.2010
[17] DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.02.002
[18] DOI: 10.1007/s10827-006-9508-5 · Zbl 05193546
[19] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210047110
[20] DOI: 10.1016/S0920-1211(96)00086-1
[21] DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.08.041
[22] DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090355
[23] DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2210246
[24] DOI: 10.1038/nature04671
[25] Strogatz S. H., Nonlinear dynamics and chaos (1994)
[26] DOI: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.26900.x
[27] DOI: 10.1038/nn.2782
[28] DOI: 10.1038/nrn1327
[29] Uhlhaas P. J., Neuron 52 (26) pp 599– (2003)
[30] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112066108
[31] DOI: 10.1152/jn.00458.2011
[32] DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014804
[33] DOI: 10.1109/CISS.2012.6310923
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.