zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

The empirical implications of privacy-aware choice. (English) Zbl 1336.91050
Summary: This paper initiates the study of the testable implications of choice data in settings where agents have privacy preferences. We adapt the standard conceptualization of consumer choice theory to a situation where the consumer is aware of, and has preferences over, the information revealed by her choices. The main message of the paper is that little can be inferred about consumers’ preferences once we introduce the possibility that the consumer has concerns about privacy. This holds even when consumers’ privacy preferences are assumed to be monotonic and separable. This motivates the consideration of stronger assumptions and, to that end, we introduce an additive model for privacy preferences that has testable implications.

91B42 Consumer behavior, demand theory
Full Text: DOI
[1] Acquisti A, Taylor C, Wagman L (2014) The economics of privacy. J. Econom. Literature. Forthcoming.
[2] Chen Y, Chong S, Kash IA, Moran T, Vadhan S (2013) Truthful mechanisms for agents that value privacy. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce. EC ’13 (ACM, New York), 215-232. CrossRef
[3] Conitzer V, Taylor CR, Wagman L (2012) Hide and seek: Costly consumer privacy in a market with repeat purchases. Marketing Sci. 31(2):277-292. Link
[4] Daughety AF, Reinganum JF (2010) Public goods, social pressure, and the choice between privacy and publicity. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 2(2):191-221. CrossRef
[5] Dekel E, Lipman BL, Rustichini A (2001) Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space. Econometrica 69(4):891-934. CrossRef · Zbl 1026.91032
[6] Dekel E, Lipman BL, Rustichini A (2009) Temptation-driven preferences. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(3):937-971. CrossRef · Zbl 1197.91076
[7] Geanakoplos J, Pearce D, Stacchetti E (1989) Psychological games and sequential rationality. Games Econom. Behav. 1(1):60-79. CrossRef · Zbl 0755.90109
[8] Ghosh A, Roth A (2011) Selling privacy at auction. Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce. EC ’11 (ACM, New York), 199-208. CrossRef · Zbl 1318.91093
[9] Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2012) Shifts in privacy concerns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(3):349-353. CrossRef
[10] Goldfarb A, Mcdevitt RC, Samila S, Silverman B (2015) The effect of social interaction on economic transactions: An embarrassment of niches?Management Sci. 61(12):2963-2981. Link
[11] Gradwohl R (2015) Privacy in implementation. CMS-EMS Discussion Paper 1561, Northestern University, Evanston, IL. · Zbl 1392.91055
[12] Gradwohl R, Smorodinsky R (2014) Subjective perception games and privacy. arXiv preprint 1409.1487. · Zbl 1393.91021
[13] Heffetz O, Ligett K (2014) Privacy and data-based research. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(2):75-98. CrossRef
[14] Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).
[15] Moor JH (1990) The ethics of privacy protection. Library Trends 39(1-2):69-82.
[16] Nissim K, Orlandi C, Smorodinsky R (2012) Privacy-aware mechanism design. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce. EC ’12 (ACM, New York), 774-789. CrossRef
[17] Nissim K, Vadhan S, Xiao D (2014) Redrawing the boundaries on purchasing data from privacy-sensitive individuals. Proc. 5th Conf. Innovations in Theoret. Comput. Sci. ITCS ’14 (ACM, New York), 411-422. CrossRef · Zbl 1366.91094
[18] Rainie L, Kiesler S, Kang R, Madden M (2013) Anonymity, privacy and security online. Technical report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.
[19] Rubinstein A (2012) Lecture Notes in Microeconomic Theory: The Economic Agent (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
[20] Simonson I, Tversky A (1992) Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J. Marketing Res. 29(3):281-285. CrossRef
[21] Taylor CR (2004) Consumer privacy and the market for customer information. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):631-650. CrossRef
[22] Varian HR (1982) The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 50(4):945-974. CrossRef · Zbl 0483.90006
[23] Varian HR (1984) Microeconomic Analysis (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).
[24] Varian HR (2006) Revealed preference. Szenberg M, Ramrattan L, Gottesman AA, eds. Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 99-115. CrossRef
[25] Xiao D (2013) Is privacy compatible with truthfulness?Proc. 4th Conf. Innovations in Theoret. Comput. Sci. ITCS ’13 (ACM, New York), 67-86. CrossRef · Zbl 1361.68076
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.