×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Bunkering decisions for a shipping liner in an uncertain environment with service contract. (English) Zbl 1346.90114
Summary: As bunker fuel cost constitutes a major portion of the shipping liners’ operating cost, it is imperative for them to minimize the bunkering cost to remain competitive. Service contract with a fuel supplier is a strategy they venture on to reduce this cost. Typically, liner operators enter into a contract with fuel suppliers where the contract is specified by a fixed fuel price and amount, to mitigate the fluctuating spot prices and uncertain fuel consumption between the ports. In this paper, we study such bunkering service contracts with known parameters and determine the liner’s optimal bunkering strategy. We propose to use bunker up to level policy for refueling, where the up to level is dynamic based on the observed spot price and determine the bunkering decisions (where to bunker and how much to bunker) at the ports. A dynamic programming model is formulated to minimize the total bunkering cost. Due to the inherent complexity in determining the gradient of the cost-to-go function, we estimate it by Monte Carlo simulation. Numerical experiments suggest that all the contract parameters must be considered together in determination of the optimal bunkering strategy. Contracting an amount lesser than the average consumption for the entire voyage, at a contract price lesser than the average spot price is found to be beneficial. The insights derived from this study can be helpful in designing these types of service contracts.

MSC:
90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
90C39 Dynamic programming
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] APL. (2012). Routes. <http://www.apl.com/routes/html/asia_europe.html>. [Accessed on 7 December 2012].
[2] Besbes, O.; Savin, S., Going bunkers: the joint route selection and refueling problem, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11, 4, 694-711, (2009)
[3] Brown, G. G.; Graves, G. W.; Ronen, D., Scheduling Ocean transportation of crude oil, Management Science, 33, 3, 335-346, (1987)
[4] Christiansen, M.; Fagerholt, K.; Nygreen, B.; Ronen, D., Maritime transportation, (Barnhart, C.; Laporte, G., Transportation. Handbooks in operations research and management science, Vol. 14, (2007), North-Holland Amsterdam), 189-284
[5] Christiansen, M.; Fagerholt, K.; Ronen, D., Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives, Transportation Science, 38, 1, 1-18, (2004)
[6] Fagerholt, K.; Laporte, G.; Norstad, I., Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 3, 523-529, (2010) · Zbl 1196.91044
[7] Flood, M. M., Application of transportation theory to scheduling a military tanker fleet, Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2, 2, 150-162, (1954)
[8] Hamilton, J. D., A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle, Econometrica, 57, 2, 357-384, (1989) · Zbl 0685.62092
[9] Jameson, N., Tanker operator introduces slower steaming, Sustainable Shipping, (2008), <http://www.sustainableshipping.com/news/2008/06/72277>. [Accessed December 2012]
[10] Kalymon, B. A., Stochastic prices in a single-item inventory purchasing model, Operations Research, 19, 6, 1434-1458, (1971) · Zbl 0237.90019
[11] B.P. Marine. (2012). Risk management portfolio. <http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=9026741&contentId=7048982>. [Accessed on 7 December 2012].
[12] Neel, R. E.; Gooding, C. W., Service contracts, rate discounting, and the future of shipping conferences, International Advances in Economic Research, 3, 4, 388-394, (1997)
[13] Notteboom, T. E.; Vernimmen, B., The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping, Journal of Transport Geography, 17, 325-337, (2009)
[14] Perakis, A. N.; Papadakis, N. A., Fleet deployment optimization models. part 1, Maritime Policy & Management, 14, 2, 127-144, (1987)
[15] Perakis, A. N.; Papadakis, N. A., Fleet deployment optimization models. part 2, Maritime Policy & Management, 14, 2, 145-155, (1987)
[16] Plun, C. E.M.; Jensen, P. N.; Pisinger, D., Bunker purchasing with contracts, Maritime Economics & Logistics, (2014), Advance online publication, 1 May 2014
[17] Ronen, D., The effect of oil price on the optimal speed of ships, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33, 11, 1035-1040, (1982)
[18] Ronen, D., Cargo ships routing and scheduling: survey of models and problems, European Journal of Operational Research, 12, 119-126, (1983)
[19] Ronen, D., Ship scheduling: the last decade, European Journal of Operational Research, 71, 325-333, (1993) · Zbl 0800.90568
[20] Ronen, D., The effect of oil price on containership speed and fleet size, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 211-216, (2011)
[21] Song, J. S.; Zipkin, P., Inventory control in a fluctuating demand environment, Operations Research, 41, 2, 351-370, (1993) · Zbl 0798.90035
[22] Sheng, X.; Lee, L. H.; Chew, E. K., Dynamic determination of vessel speed and selection of bunkering ports for liner shipping under stochastic environment, OR Spectrum, 36, 2, 455-480, (2014) · Zbl 1290.90016
[23] Yao, Z.; Ng, E. K.; Lee, L. H., A study on the planning of liner ship service with ship speed and bunkering port considerations, Computers & Operations Research, 39, 1160-1172, (2012)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.