×

Pre-evaluation of contingency plans for meteorological disasters based on LINMAP method. (English) Zbl 1356.90067

Wen, Zhenkun (ed.) et al., Foundations of intelligent systems. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on intelligent systems and knowledge engineering, ISKE 2013, Shenzhen, China, November 20–23, 2013. 2 volume set. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-642-54923-6/pbk). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 277, 921-929 (2014).
Summary: As the guidelines of dealing with meteorological disasters, whether contingency plans are perfect or not will affect the efficiency of the emergency response directly. In this paper, the process of pre-evaluation of contingency plans is expounded in detail: Firstly, this process is based on multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) method, which is to find a best solution from all feasible plans assessed on multiple attributes; secondly, the linear programming technique for multi-dimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) method is used to develop decision analysis and generates the best alternative as the solution; thirdly, the typical evaluation indexes are selected and a numerical example is presented to demonstrate the validity and applicability of the proposed method. Finally, because the pre-evaluation results are difficult to verify, Copeland rule is used to colligate the ranking orders of different decision departments.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1294.68030].

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
90C29 Multi-objective and goal programming
90C05 Linear programming
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] pp. · Zbl 0316.92024 · doi:10.1007/BF02291658
[2] pp. · Zbl 0453.90002 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
[3] pp. · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
[4] pp. · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.08.004
[5] pp. · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2012.03.011
[6] pp. · Zbl 05911265 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2010.07.026
[7] pp. · Zbl 06094428 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2010.04.019
[8] pp. · Zbl 1099.90549 · doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.006
[9] pp. · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.011
[10] pp. · Zbl 1239.90074 · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2011.10.001
[11] pp. · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2010.07.014
[12] pp. · Zbl 1094.90055 · doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2005.11.001
[13] pp. · Zbl 05170918 · doi:10.1142/S0218488507004509
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.