×

Classical and special relativity in four steps. (English) Zbl 1390.83008

Summary: The most fundamental and pedagogically useful path to the space-time transformations of both classical and special relativity is to postulate the principle of relativity, derive the generalised or Ignatowsky transformation which contains both, then apply two different second postulates that give either the Galilean or Lorentz transformation. What is new here is (a) a simple two-step derivation of the Ignatowsky transformation, (b) a second postulate of universal time which yields the Galilean transformation, and (c) a different second postulate of finite universal lightspeed to give the Lorentz transformation using a simple Ignatowsky transformation of a light wave. This method demonstrates that the fundamental difference between Galilean and Lorentz transformations is not that lightspeed is universal (which is true for both) but whether the model requires lightspeed to be infinite or finite (as once mentioned by Einstein).

MSC:

83A05 Special relativity
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Heras, R., Four easy routes to the Lorentz transformations: addendum to ‘Lorentz transformations and the wave equation’, Eur. J. Phys., 38, (2017) · Zbl 1358.83005 · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/38/1/019401
[2] Heras, R., Lorentz transformations and the wave equation, Eur. J. Phys., 37, (2016) · Zbl 1338.83020 · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/37/2/025603
[3] Chao, S. D., Einstein’s sigh: hidden symmetry in Einstein’s derivation of the Lorentz transformation, Eur. J. Phys., 38, (2017) · Zbl 1365.83002 · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/aa5392
[4] Di Rocco, H. O., Comment on ‘Lorentz transformations and the wave equation’, Eur. J. Phys., 38, (2016) · Zbl 1358.83004 · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/38/1/018001
[5] Bessonov, E. G., Another route to the Lorentz transformations, Phys.—Usp., 59, 475-479, (2016) · doi:10.3367/UFNe.2015.11.037648
[6] Lorentz, H. A.; Lorentz, H. A., Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity less than the speed of light, Proc. Sect. Sci. Kon. Akad. Wetensch.. The Principle of Relativity, 6, 9-34, (1952), New York: Dover, New York
[7] Ignatowsky, W. V., Einige allgemeine Bemerkungen zum Relativitätsprinzip, Phys. Z., 11, 972-976, (1910) · JFM 41.0766.01
[8] Pars, L. A.; Strauss, M. D H.; Lee, A. R.; Kalotas, T. M.; Lévy-Leblond, J. M.; Srivastava, A. M.; Mermin, N. D.; Coleman, B.; Pal, P. B.; Certik, O.; Pelissetto, A.; Testa, M., The Lorentz transformation. A simple proof of the Lorentz transformation. Lorentz transformations from the first postulate. One more derivation of the Lorentz transformation. Invariant speed in special relativity. Relativity without light. A dual first-postulate basis for special relativity. Nothing but Relativity. Simple derivation of the special theory of relativity without the speed of light axiom. Getting the Lorentz transformations without requiring an invariant speed, Phil. Mag.. Nature. Am. J. Phys.. Am. J. Phys.. Am. J. Phys.. Am. J. Phys.. Eur. J. Phys.. Eur. J. Phys.. Am. J. Phys., 83, 338-340, (2015) · doi:10.1119/1.4901453
[9] Galilei, G.; Drake, S.; Brown, H. R.; Brown, H. R.; French, S.; Kamminga, H., Correspondence, invariance and heuristics in the emergence of special relativity, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems—Ptolemaic and Copernican. Physical Relativity: Space-Time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective. Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics; Essays in Honour of Heinz Post, 227-260, (1993), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, Oxford: Clarendon, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, Oxford: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, Oxford: Clarendon, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, Oxford, Dordrecht: Kluwer, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, Oxford: Clarendon, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, Oxford: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, Oxford: Clarendon, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, Oxford, Dordrecht
[10] Galilei, G.; Drake, S., Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems—Ptolemaic and Copernican, 186-187, (1967), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
[11] Voigt, W., Ueber das Doppler’sche Princip, Nachr. Königl. Ges. Wiss. Georg-Augusts-Univ., 2, 41-51, (1887) · JFM 19.1077.03
[12] Newton, I., The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, (1729) · Zbl 0127.00501
[13] Minkowski, H.; Hoffmann, B., Raum und Zeit. Relativity and Its Roots, (1999), New York: Dover, New York
[14] Einstein, A., Physics and reality, J. Frankl. Inst., 221, 349-382, (1936) · doi:10.1016/S0016-0032(36)91047-5
[15] Einstein, A.; Lorentz, H. A., Zur Electrodynamik bewegter Körper, Ann. Phys.. The principle of relativity, 17, 35-65, (1952), New York: Dover, New York · JFM 36.0920.02 · doi:10.1002/andp.19053221004
[16] Maxwell, J. C., A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, 155, 459-512, (1865) · doi:10.1098/rstl.1865.0008
[17] Baierlein, R., Two myths about special relativity, Am. J. Phys., 74, 193-195, (2006) · doi:10.1119/1.2151212
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.