zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

An iterative coupling between meshless methods to solve embedded crack problems. (English) Zbl 1403.74103
Summary: A truly meshless iterative coupling is presented to solve linear elastic fracture mechanic (LEFM) problems. The global domain of the problem is decomposed into sub-domains, where each one is addressed using an appropriate meshless method. The sub-domain which has embedded cracks is modeled by the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) with the help of the numerical Greens function (NGF) approach and the sub-domain without cracks is modeled by the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) procedure. By using the NGF approach the representation of the crack is automatically included. The specific computations of each meshless method are performed independently, coupled with an iterative renewal of variables procedure, restricted to interface unknowns, to achieve the final convergence. The iterative solution procedure presented yields good results as compared with the boundary element method and analytical solutions for stress intensity factor computations.

74S05 Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
65N30 Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
65N80 Fundamental solutions, Green’s function methods, etc. for boundary value problems involving PDEs
74B05 Classical linear elasticity
74R10 Brittle fracture
Full Text: DOI
[1] Belytschko, T.; Krongauz, Y.; Organ, D.; Fleming, M.; Krysl, P., Meshless methodsan overview and recent developments, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 139, 3-47, (1996) · Zbl 0891.73075
[2] Golberg, M. A.; Chen, C. S., The method of fundamental solutions for potential, Helmholtz and diffusion problems, (Golberg, M. A., Boundary integral methods—numerical and mathematical aspects, (1998), Computational Mechanics Publications Southhampton), 103-176 · Zbl 0945.65130
[3] Atluri SN, Shen S. The meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method. Tech. Science; 2002. · Zbl 1012.65116
[4] Nguyen, V. P.; Rabczuk, T.; Bordas, S.; Duflot, M., Meshless methodsa review and computer implementation aspects, Math Comput Simul, 79, 3, 763-813, (2008) · Zbl 1152.74055
[5] Gu, Y. T.; Zhang, L. C., Coupling of the meshfree and finite element methods for determination of the crack tip fields, Eng Fract Mech, 75, 986-1004, (2008)
[6] Godinho, L.; Soares, D., Frequency domain analysis of interacting acoustic-elastodynamic models taking into account optimized iterative coupling of different numerical methods, Eng Anal Bound Elem, 32, 1074-1088, (2013) · Zbl 1287.74011
[7] Godinho, L.; Soares, D., Frequency domain analysis of fluid-solid interaction problems by means of iteratively coupled meshless approaches, Comput Model Eng Sci, 87, 327-354, (2012) · Zbl 1356.76300
[8] Kupradze, V. D.; Aleksidze, M. A., The method of functional equations for the approximate solution of certain boundary value problems, U.S.S.R. Comput Math Math Phys, 4, 4, 82-126, (1964) · Zbl 0154.17604
[9] Fontes, E. F.; Santiago, J. A.F.; Telles, J. C.F., On a regularized method of fundamental solutions coupled with the numerical green׳s function procedure to solve embedded crack problems, Eng Anal Boundary Elem, 37, 1, 1-7, (2013) · Zbl 1351.74089
[10] Telles, J. C.F.; Castor, G. S.; Guimaraes, S., A numerical green׳s function approach for boundary elements applied to fracture mechanics, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 38, 3259-3274, (1995) · Zbl 0836.73079
[11] Guimaraes, S.; Telles, J. C.F., General application of numerical green׳s functions for SIF computations with boundary elements, Comput Model Eng Sci, 1, 131-139, (2000)
[12] Guimaraes, S.; Telles, J. C.F., The method of fundamental solutions for fracture mechanics-reissner׳s plate application, Eng Anal Bound Elem, 33, 1152-1160, (2009) · Zbl 1206.74022
[13] Atluri, S. N.; Zhu, T., A new meshless local Petrov-Galerkin xmlpgx approach in computational mechanics, Comput Mech, 22, 117-127, (1998) · Zbl 0932.76067
[14] Liew, K. M.; Cheng, Y.; Kitipornchai, S., Boundary element-free method (BEFM) and its application to two-dimensional elasticity problems, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 65, 8, 1310-1332, (2006) · Zbl 1147.74047
[15] Ching, H.-K.; Batra, R. C., Determination of crack tip field in linear elastostatics by the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method, Comput Model Eng Sci, 2, 273-289, (2001)
[16] Miers, L. S.; Telles, J. C.F., On NGF applications to LBIE potential and displacement discontinuity analyses, Key Eng Mater, 454, 127-135, (2001)
[17] Brebbia, C. A.; Telles, J. C.F.; Wrobel, L. C., Boundary elements techniques: theory and applications in engineering, (1984), Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York · Zbl 0556.73086
[18] Lancaster, P.; Salkauskas, K., Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods, Math Comput, 37, 141-158, (1981) · Zbl 0469.41005
[19] Atluri, S. N.; Zhu, T., The meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach for solving problems in elastostatics, Comput Mech, 25, 169-179, (2000) · Zbl 0976.74078
[20] Elleithy, W. M.; Al-Gahtani, H. J., An overlapping domain decomposition approach for coupling finite and boundary element methods, Eng Anal Bound Elem, 24, 391-398, (2000) · Zbl 1118.76332
[21] Lin, C. C.; Lawton, E. C.; Caliendo, J. A.; Anderson, L. R., An iterative finite element-boundary element algorithm, Comput Struct, 59, 5, 899-909, (1996) · Zbl 0918.73179
[22] Maojun, L.; Jialin, Z., A domain decomposition method combining a boundary element method with a meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method, Lect Notes Comput Sci Eng, 78, 391-398, (2011) · Zbl 1217.65228
[23] Carneiro FLLB. A new method to determine the tensile strength of concrete. In: Proceedings of the fifth meeting of the Brazilian association for technical rules; 1943. p. 126-9.
[24] Yarema, S. Ya.; Ivanitskaya, G. S.; Maistrenko, A. L.; Zboromirskii, A. I., Crack development in a sintered carbide in combined deformation of types I and II, Strength Mater, 16, 8, 1121-1128, (1984)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.