×

The charm quark as \(a\) naturalness success. (English) Zbl 1425.81096

Summary: Undeniably, the naturalness principle has had a major role in particle physics during the last decades, in particular in model building. Nowadays, one can find a wide range of different definitions. Some of them seem mutually exclusive, but traditionally, its notion has been linked to the fine-tuning problem. Understanding naturalness as the imposition that fine-tuning problems have to vanish, for instance, due to the existence of new particles, new models as those based in supersymmetry were built. In order to palliate the fine-tuning problem the Higgs sector of the standard model seems to suffer, new physics should have appeared already in the last LHC run. Thus, the persistence of fine-tuning has originated numerous works exploring both, the limits and the different conceptual definitions of naturalness. However, little work has been done re-examining precisely one of the main pillars naturalness advocates: its historical successes. Given the current period in which the critics to the naturalness principle are undergoing, we find important to explore in detail the historical examples often cited, primarily the charm quark proposal and its mass prediction, and see how can this contribute to the debate.

MSC:

81V05 Strong interaction, including quantum chromodynamics
81T60 Supersymmetric field theories in quantum mechanics
81V22 Unified quantum theories
81R40 Symmetry breaking in quantum theory
81P05 General and philosophical questions in quantum theory
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Aubert, J. J.; Becker, U.; Biggs, P. J.; Burger, J.; Chen, M.; Everhart, G., Experimental observation of a heavy particle, J. Physical Review Letters, 33, 23, 1404-1406 (1974)
[2] Augustin, J. E.; Boyarski, A.; Breidenbach, M.; Bulos, F.; Dakin, J. T.; Feldman, G. J., Discovery of a Narrow Resonance in \(e^+e^-\) Annihilation, Phys.Rev.Lett.Adv.Exp.Phys., 335, 5 (1974)
[3] Barbieri, R.; Giudice, G. F., Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nuclear Physics, Section B, 306, 1, 63-76 (1988)
[4] Baumann, D.; McAllister, L., Inflation and String Theory (2015), Cambridge University Press · Zbl 1339.83003
[5] Bettini, A., Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics (2014), Cambridge University Press
[6] Borrelli, A., The case of the composite Higgs: The model as a “Rosetta stone” in contemporary high-energy physics, Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43, 3, 195-214 (2012) · Zbl 1281.81062
[7] Borrelli, A., Narratives of “naturalness” in today’s particle physics community, (Blume, Hermann; Leitgeb, Christoph; Rössner, Michael, Narrated communities - Narrated Realities (2015), Brill | Rodopi)
[8] Borrelli, A., The weinberg-salam model of electroweak interactions: Ingenious discovery or lucky hunch?, Annalen der Physik, 530, 2, 1700454 (2018) · Zbl 07754506
[9] Bouchiat, C.; Iliopoulos, J.; Meyer, P., An anomaly-free version of Weinberg’s model, Physics Letters B, 38, 7, 519-523 (1972)
[10] Brown, L. M.; Riordan, M.; Dresden, M.; Hoddeson, L., The rise of the standard model: 1964-1979, (Hoddeson, L.; Brown, L.; Riordan, M.; Dresden, M., The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s (1997), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge), 3-35
[11] Cabibbo, N.; Maiani, L., Origin of the weak-interaction angle. II, Physical Review D, 1, 2, 707-718 (1970)
[12] Craig, N., Naturalness and new approaches to the hierarchy problem, Prospects in Theoretical Physics notes (2017)
[13] Dine, M., Naturalness under stress, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 65, 34 (2015)
[14] Dirac, P. A., The cosmological constants, Journal: Nature, 139, 323 (1937) · Zbl 0016.18504
[15] Fabbrichesi, M.; Urbano, A., Naturalness redux: The case of the neutrino seesaw mechanism, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 92, 1 (2015)
[16] Farina, M.; Pappadopulo, D.; Strumia, A., A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013, 8 (2013)
[17] Friederich, S., Fine-Tuning (2017), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
[18] Gaillard, M. K.; Lee, B. W., Rare decay modes of the E mesons in gauge theories, Physical Review D, 10 (1974)
[19] Gell-Mann, M., A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Physics Letters, 8, 3, 214-215 (1964)
[20] Gell-Mann, M., The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex (1997), Owl Books · Zbl 0833.00011
[21] Georgi, H.; Glashow, S. L., Unity of all elementary-particle forces, Physical Review Letters, 32, 8, 438-441 (1974)
[22] Gilman, F., The November Revolution (1985), SLAC Beam Line
[23] Giudice, G., Naturally speaking: The naturalness criterion and physics at the LHC, (Kane, Gordon; Pierce, Aaron (2008), Perspectives on LHC physics)
[24] Giudice, G. F., Naturalness after LHC8. PoS, EPS-HEP201, 1, 163 (2013)
[25] Giudice, G. F., The Dawn of the post-Naturalness Era, (Forte, S.; Levy, A.; Ridolfi, G., From my vast repertoire : The legacy of Guido Altarelli (2018), World Scientific)
[26] Glashow, S. L.; Iliopoulos, J.; Maiani, L., Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev., D2, 7, 1285-1292 (1970)
[27] Grinbaum, A., Which fine-tuning arguments are fine?, Foundations of Physics, 42, 5, 615-631 (2012) · Zbl 1242.81007
[28] Hooft, G., Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, (Recent Developments in Gauge Theories (1980), Springer US: Springer US Boston, MA), 135-157
[29] Hossenfelder, S., Naturalness is dead. Long live naturalness (2017)
[30] Iliopoulos, J., What a fourth quark can do, (The rise of the standard model: Particle physics in the 1960s and 1970s (1997), Cambridge University Press), 447-458
[31] Iliopoulos, J., Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani mechanism, Scholarpedia, 5, 5, 7125 (2010)
[32] Ioffe, B. L., Weak interactions at short distances, Soviet Physics - Uspekhi, 1 (1973)
[33] Ioffe, B.; Shabalin, P., Neutral currents and the limit of validity of the theory of weak interactions, Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, 6, 603 (1968)
[34] Kaul, R. K., Gauge hierarchy in a supersymmetric model, Physics Letters B, 109, 1-2, 19-24 (1982)
[35] Kibble, T. W.B., History of electroweak symmetry breaking, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 626, Article 012001 pp. (2015)
[36] Krauss, L. M., A Brief History of the Grand Unified Theory of Physics (2017), Nautilus
[37] Lane, K., Two Lectures on Technicolor. Spring, 60 (2002)
[38] Langacker, P., The standard model and beyond (2017), CRC Press · Zbl 1376.81003
[39] Lee, B. W.; Primack, J. R.; Treiman, S. B., Some physical constraints on gauge models of weak interactions, Physical Review D, 7, 2, 510-516 (1973)
[40] Ma, E., K decays, and quark masses in gauge models, Physical Review D, 9 (1974)
[41] Maiani, L., The GIM mechanism: Origin, predictions and recent uses, (48th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories : La Thuile, Italy, March 2-9, 2013 (2013))
[42] Mohapatra, R. N.; Rao, J. S.; Marshak, R. E., \(K_L^0\)→\(μ^+μ^-\) decay, \(K_L^0-K_S^0\) Mass difference, and weak-interaction cutoff, Physical Review Letters, 20, 19, 1081-1084 (1968)
[43] Murayama, H., Supersymmetry phenomenology, 40 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0002232v2 · Zbl 0971.81036
[44] Peskin, M. E.; Schroeder, D. V., An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory (1995), Westview Press
[45] Pickering, A., Constructing quarks : A sociological history of particle physics (1984), University of Chicago Press
[46] Pierce, A., Implications of the Higgs boson and the LHC for the MSSM, (Schmaltz, M.; Pierpaoli, E., Searching for New Physics at Small and Large Scales: TASI 2012 (2013))
[47] Rosaler, J.; Harlander, R., Naturalness, Wilsonian renormalization, and “fundamental parameters” in quantum field theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (2019)
[48] Susskind, L., Dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the weinberg- Salam theory, Phys. Rev., D20, 2619-2625 (1979)
[49] Teller, P., The philosopher problem, (The rise of the standard model: Particle physics in the 1960s and 1970s (1997), Cambridge University Press), 634-637
[50] Vainshtein, A. I.; Khriplovich, I. B., Restrictions on masses of supercharged hadrons in the weinberg model, Pis’ma v Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 18, 141-145 (1973)
[51] Veltman, M., The infrared ultraviolet connection, Acta Physica Polonica B, 12, 5, 437-457 (1981)
[52] Vissani, F., Do experiments suggest a hierarchy problem?, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 57, 11, 7027-7030 (1998)
[53] Weinberg, S., A model of leptons, Physical Review Letters, 19, 21, 1264-1266 (1967)
[54] Weinberg, S., Effects of a neutral intermediate boson in semileptonic processes, Physical Review D, 5, 6, 1412-1417 (1972)
[55] Wells, J. D., The utility of Naturalness, and how its application to Quantum Electrodynamics envisages the Standard Model and Higgs boson, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Vol. 49, 102-108 (2015) · Zbl 1307.81076
[56] Wells, J. D., The theoretical physics ecosystem behind the discovery of the Higgs boson (2016), arXiv:1609.04268
[57] Williams, P., Naturalness, the autonomy of scales, and the 125GeV Higgs, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Vol. 51, 82-96 (2015) · Zbl 1320.81103
[58] Wilson, K. G., The origins of lattice gauge theory, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, 140, 3-19 (2005)
[59] Witten, E., Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry, Nuclear Physics, Section B, 188, 3, 513-554 (1981) · Zbl 1258.81046
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.