zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules. (English) Zbl 0479.90015

91B14 Social choice
Full Text: DOI
[1] De Meyer, F.; Plott, C.R., The probability of a cyclical majority, Econometrica, 38, 345-354, (1970)
[2] Fishburn, P.C., Simple voting systems and majority rule, Behav. sci., 19, 166-176, (1974)
[3] Fishburn, P.C.; Gehrlein, W.V., An analysis of simple two stage voting systems, Behav. sci., 21, 1-12, (1976)
[4] Fishburn, P.C.; Gehrlein, W.V., An analysis of voting procedures with nonranked voting, Behav. sci., 22, 178-185, (1977)
[5] Garman, M.; Kamien, M., The paradox of voting: probability calculations, Behav. sci., 13, 306-316, (1968)
[6] Gehrlein, W.V.; Fishburn, P.C., Condorcet’s paradox and anonymous preference profiles, Public choice, 26, 1-18, (1976)
[7] Gehrlein, W.V.; Fishburn, P.C., The probability of the paradox of voting: a computable solution, J. econom. theory, 13, 14-25, (1976) · Zbl 0351.90002
[8] Gehrlein, W.V.; Fishburn, P.C., Proportions of profiles with a majority candidate, Comput. math. appl., 5, 117-124, (1979) · Zbl 0408.90011
[9] Kelly, J.S., Voting anomalies, the number of voters, and the number of alternatives, Econometrica, 42, 239-251, (1974) · Zbl 0289.90005
[10] Niemi, R.G.; Weisberg, H.F., A mathematical solution to the probability of the paradox of voting, Behav. sci., 13, 317-323, (1968)
[11] Selby, S.M., Standard mathematical tables, (1965), Chemical Rubber Co Cleveland, 390
[12] Sevcik, K.E., Exact probabilities of the voters paradox through seven issues and seven judges, (), Section III-B
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.