zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

On the use of archetypes as benchmarks. (English) Zbl 1199.90016
Benchmarking is concerned with comparing the performance of competing organizations in an attempt to improve their results. It is essentially a process aiming at establishing standards against which processes, products and performance can be compared. Through archetypal analysis the authors propose to define some reference points that can be used as benchmarks. Archetypes lie on the frontier of the multivariate data scatter of the achieved performance, and it is suggested therefore regarding them as empirical standards. The authors adopt the exploratory data analysis standpoint and present some interactive graphical devices that allow users to profitably deal with these archetypal-benchmarks. Some exploratory tools are designed to visually analyze the benchmarks, and to understand their features through the inspection of archetypes composition. It is proposed to use parallel coordinates to compare observed performance levels with one another and with respect to the benchmarks. Finally proposed approach is presented by means of an illustrative example based on The Times league table of the world top 200 universities.

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
Full Text: DOI
[1] Cutler, Archetypal analysis, Technometrics 36 pp 338– (1994) · Zbl 0804.62002
[2] Stone, Introduction to archetypal analysis of spatio-temporal dynamics, Physica D 96 pp 110– (1996) · Zbl 0900.76189
[3] Stone, Exploring archetypal dynamics of pattern formation in cellular flames, Physica D 161 pp 163– (2002) · Zbl 1044.62126
[4] Chan, Archetypal analysis of galaxy spectra, Monthly Notice of the Royal Astronomical Society 338 (3) pp 790– (2003)
[5] Elder A, Pinnel J. Archetypal analysis: an alternative approach to finding and defining segments. Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, Sequim, WA, 2003; 113-129.
[6] Li S, Wang P, Louviere J, Carson R. Archetypal analysis: a new way to segment markets based on extreme individuals. A Celebration of Ehrenberg and Bass: Marketing Knowledge, Discoveries and Contribution, ANZMAC 2003 Conference Proceedings, Adelaide, Australia, 2003; 1674-1679.
[7] D’Esposito, Archetypal analysis for interval data in marketing research, Statistica Applicata 18 pp 343– (2006)
[8] Zhu, Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking (2003) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4246-6
[9] Camp, Business Process Benchmarking, Finding and Implementing Best Practice (1995)
[10] Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980) · Zbl 0587.90002
[11] Eyrich, Benchmarking to become the best of breed, Manufacturing Systems 9 pp 40– (1991)
[12] Smith, The use of performance indicators in the public sector, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 153 pp 53– (1990) · doi:10.2307/2983096
[13] Talluri, A benchmarking method for business-process reengineering and improvement, The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 12 pp 291– (2000)
[14] Koh, A business model for uncertainty management, Benchmarking: An International Journal 12 pp 383– (2005) · doi:10.1108/14635770510609042
[15] Binder, Achieving internal process benchmarking: guidance from BASF, Benchmarking: An International Journal 13 pp 662– (2006) · doi:10.1108/14635770610709040
[16] Goldstein, Multilevel structural equation models for the analysis of comparative data on educational performance, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 32 pp 252– (2007) · doi:10.3102/ · doi:1076998606298042
[17] Mora Monge, Performance measurement of AMT: a cross-regional study, Benchmarking: An International Journal 13 pp 135– (2006) · doi:10.1108/14635770610644637
[18] Camgoz-Akdag, Total quality management through six sigma benchmarking: a case study, Benchmarking: An International Journal 14 pp 186– (2007) · doi:10.1108/14635770710740387
[19] Charnes, Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications (1993)
[20] O’Leary J. Determined challengers keep heat on the elite. In World University Rankings. The Times Higher Education Supplement, Ince M (ed.). 2005; 2-5. Available at: www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/Magazines/THES/graphics/WorldRankings2005.pdf.
[21] Pemberton, Benchmarking and the role of organizational learning in developing competitive advantage, Knowledge and Process Management 8 (2) pp 123– (2001) · doi:10.1002/kpm.110
[22] Blankenship, Metric benchmarking, Journal-American Water Works Association 90 pp 57– (1998)
[23] Kingdom, Use of performance indicators and performance benchmarking in the North American water industry findings from studies recently completed for AWWA and WEF research foundations, Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua 47 pp 269– (1998) · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2087.1998.00112.x
[24] Royal statistical society working party on performance monitoring in the public services. Performance indicators: good, bad and ugly. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 2005; 168:1-27.
[25] Cutler, A branch and bound algorithm for convex least squares, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 22 pp 305– (1993) · Zbl 0775.65024
[26] Coxeter, Introduction to Geometry (1989)
[27] Asimov, The grand tour: a tool for viewing multidimensional data, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 6 pp 128– (1985) · Zbl 0552.62052
[28] Swayne, GGobi: evolving from XGobi into an extensible framework for interactive data visualization, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 43 pp 423– (2003) · Zbl 1429.62013
[29] Wegman, Hyperdimensional data analysis using parallel coordinates, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 pp 664– (1990)
[30] Inselberg, The plane with parallel coordinates, The Visual Computer 1 pp 69– (1985) · Zbl 0617.52005
[31] Barnett, The ordering of multivariate data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 139 pp 318– (1976)
[32] Liu, Multivariate analysis by data depth: descriptive statistics, graphics and inference, The Annals of Statistics 27 pp 783– (1999)
[33] Hartigan, Printer graphics for clustering, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 4 pp 187– (1975) · Zbl 0321.62069
[34] Wegman, High dimensional clustering using parallel coordinates and the grand tour, Computing Science and Statistics 28 pp 352– (1997)
[35] Wilhelm, Visual clustering and classification: the oronsay particle size data set revisited, Computational Statistics: Special Issue on Interactive Graphical Data Analysis 14 (1) pp 109– (1999) · Zbl 0927.62065
[36] Young, Computational Statistics. Handbook of Statistics 9 pp 959– (1993) · doi:10.1016/S0169-7161(05)80151-8
[37] Rueda, Geometric visualization of clusters obtained from fuzzy clustering algorithms, Pattern Recognition 39 pp 1415– (2006) · Zbl 1095.68674
[38] Aitchison, The statistical analysis of compositional data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 44 pp 139– (1982) · Zbl 0491.62017
[39] Aitchison, Biplots of compositional data, Applied Statistics 51 pp 375– (2002) · Zbl 1111.62300
[40] Van Den Boogaart, ’Compositions’: a unified R package to analyze compositional data, Computers and Geosciences 34 pp 320– (2008)
[41] Aitchison, Logratio analysis and compositional distance, Mathematical Geology 32 pp 271– (2000) · Zbl 1101.86309
[42] Rehder, Letter to the Editor: Comment on ’Logratio Analysis and Compositional Distance’ by J. Aitchison C. Barceló-Vidal, J. A. Martín-Fernández, and V. Pawlowsky-Glahn, Mathematical Geology 33 pp 845– (2001)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.