zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

A method for solving fuzzy multicriteria decision problems with dependent criteria. (English) Zbl 1187.90339
Summary: We propose a new multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method based on fuzzy pair-wise comparisons and a feedback between the criteria. The evaluation of the weights of criteria, the variants as well as the feedback between the criteria is based on the data given in pair-wise comparison matrices. Extended arithmetic operations with fuzzy numbers are used as well as ordering fuzzy relations to compare fuzzy outcomes. An illustrating numerical example is presented to clarify the methodology. A special SW-Microsoft Excel add-in named FVK was developed for applying the proposed method. Comparing to other software products, FVK is free, able to work with fuzzy data and utilizes capabilities of widespread spreadsheet Microsoft Excel.

90C70 Fuzzy and other nonstochastic uncertainty mathematical programming
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
90C29 Multi-objective and goal programming
FVK; Excel
Full Text: DOI
[1] Aguarón J., Moreno-Jimenéz J. M. (2003) The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds. European Journal of Operational Research 147: 137–145 ISSN 0377-2217 · Zbl 1060.90657
[2] Buckley J. J. (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17(1): 233–247 ISSN 0165-0114 · Zbl 0602.90002
[3] Buckley J. J. et al (2001) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited. European Journal of Operational Research 129: 48–64 · Zbl 1002.93022
[4] Büyüközkan G., Ertay T., Kahraman C., Ruyan D. (2004) Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 19(5): 443–461 ISSN: 0884-8173 · Zbl 1101.68837
[5] Chen, S. J., Hwang, C. L., & Hwang, F. P. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (vol.375). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN: 3-540-54998-6. · Zbl 0768.90042
[6] Enea M., Piazza T. (2004) Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy optimization and decision making 3: 39–62 ISSN: 1568-4539 · Zbl 1062.68114
[7] Lootsma F. A. (1993) Scale sensitivity in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 2: 87–110 · Zbl 0838.90009
[8] Lootsma F. A. (1996) A model for the relative importance of the criteria in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. European Journal of Operational Research 94: 467–476 · Zbl 0947.90598
[9] Mikhailov L., Singh M. G. (2003) Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support systems. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, IEEE Transactions 33(1): 33–41 ISSN: 1094-6977
[10] Mohanty R. P., Agarwal R., Choudhury A. K., Tiwari M. K. (2005) A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: A case study. International Journal of Production Research 43(24): 5199–5216 · Zbl 1080.90530
[11] Ramik, J. (2007). Interval and fuzzy linear programming (demonstrated by example). In: Proceedings of 25th Internationak Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics, Sep. 04-06, 2007 Ostrava, Czech Republic (pp.290–299). ISBN: 978-80-248-1457-5.
[12] Saaty T. L. (1978) Exploring the interface between hierarchies, multiple objectives and fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1: 57–68 ISSN: 0165-0114 · Zbl 0378.94001
[13] Saaty T. L. (1991) Multicriteria decision making–the analytical hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
[14] Saaty T. L. (2001) Decision making with dependence and feedback–the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8
[15] Laarhoven P. J. M., Pedrycz W. (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11(4): 229–241 ISSN: 0165-0114 · Zbl 0528.90054
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.