##
**A multicriteria decision aid methodology to deal with conflicting situations on the weights.**
*(English)*
Zbl 0589.90048

Summary: This paper proposes a decision aid methodology to deal with discrete multicriteria situations in which the objective of the decision maker is to select the action generating the least conflict between several actors. These actors express different (conflicting) levels of acceptance for the relative importance of the evaluation criteria (weights), which the decision maker wants to take into account.

Basically, the methodology proposes an overall compromise criterion, which ’corrects’ the average sum aggregation of the performances by an acceptability index combining all the actors’ individual preferences. A computer program embodying the methodology, in the three criteria problem, has been applied to an illustrative case study in the field of municipal management.

Basically, the methodology proposes an overall compromise criterion, which ’corrects’ the average sum aggregation of the performances by an acceptability index combining all the actors’ individual preferences. A computer program embodying the methodology, in the three criteria problem, has been applied to an illustrative case study in the field of municipal management.

### MSC:

90B50 | Management decision making, including multiple objectives |

### Keywords:

several actors; conflicting situations; decision aid; discrete multicriteria; weights; overall compromise criterion; acceptability index; municipal management
PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{C. A. Bana e Costa}, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 26, 22--34 (1986; Zbl 0589.90048)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | Eckenrode, R.T., Weighting multiple criteria, Management science, 12, 3, 172-191, (1965) |

[2] | () |

[3] | Goichochea, A.; Hansen, R.; Duckstein, L., Multi-objective decision analysis with engineering and business applications, (1982), Wiley New York · Zbl 0584.90045 |

[4] | Hinloopen, E.; Nijkamp, P.; Rietveld, P., Analysis of conflicts and compromises using qualitative data, () |

[5] | Hwang, C.; Yoon, K., Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications, A state-of-the-art survey, () · Zbl 0453.90002 |

[6] | Keeney, R.; Raiffa, H., Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and values tradeoffs, (1976), Wiley New York |

[7] | () |

[8] | Roy, B., Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la Décision, (1985), Economica Paris |

[9] | Taylor, A.E.; Mann, W.R., Advanced calculus, (1972), Xerox College Publishing Lexington, MA · Zbl 0246.26001 |

[10] | Voogd, H., Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning, (1983), Pion London |

[11] | Zeleny, M., Multiple criteria decision making, (1982), McGraw-Hill New York · Zbl 0588.90019 |

[12] | Zionts, S., Multiple criteria decision making: an overview and several approaches, () · Zbl 0578.90039 |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.