Borceux, Francis; van den Bossche, Gilberte Quantales and their sheaves. (English) Zbl 0595.18003 Order 3, 61-87 (1986). A quantale, as defined by the authors, is the non-commutative analogue of a locale. Thus, a quantale Q is a complete lattice with a binary operation \(Q\times Q\to^{\&}Q\), which is associative, idempotent, and sup-preserving in each variable. Elements of Q are taken to be right- sided, i.e., a & 1\(=a\) for all \(a\in Q\), where 1 denotes the top element of Q. An element is called two-sided if furthermore 1 & a\(=a\). If b is two-sided, then a & b\(=a\wedge b\) for all \(a\in Q\), and it follows that the two-sided elements of Q form a locale. It should be pointed out that a different notion of quantale has been considered in other contexts, where the requirement of idempotence is dropped. The goal of this paper is to associate to each quantale a Grothendieck topos of sheaves (not necessarily localic). It is hoped that this will provide a framework for investigating the representation theory of non- commutative rings and algebras. The paper begins by developing some of the basic theory of quantales and their morphisms, as well as generalizing certain concepts (such as points) and certain constructions (such as coproducts) from the localic case. In developing the notion of sheaf on a quantale Q, the non-commutativity comes into play in that given \(a\leq b\) in Q, there are two restriction maps \(\downarrow a\to \downarrow b\), right and left restriction, which need not coincide. In fact, right restriction is well defined if and only if a & b\(=b.\) The category \({\mathcal Q}\) is formed, whose objects are \(\downarrow a\) for \(a\in Q\) and whose morphisms are the left restrictions and the right restrictions, when they happen to be defined. \({\mathcal Q}\) is made into a site by defining a Grothendieck topology, which essentially requires coverings to have ”sufficiently many” right restrictions. This leads to the desired topos of sheaves. If Q is a locale, the usual construction of sheaves on a locale is recovered. sh(\({\mathcal Q})\) has the additional feature that the locale of subobjects of an object comes equipped with an additional quantale structure extending that of the original quantale. There is a surjective strict morphism Sub(1)\(\to Q\) of quantales, where Sub(1) is endowed with this additional structure. Thus, in addition to the internal logic of the topos, there is the ”quantum” logic of \({\mathcal Q}\) reflected in sh(\({\mathcal Q}).\) As a final thought, it would be nice if these ideas could be even further generalized by dropping the requirement of idempotence. There are many interesting quantales without an idempotent operation, such as the quantale of all right ideals of a non-commutative ring. It might prove useful to associate to such a quantale a category of ”sheaves” (it might no longer be a topos, but it should at least be a closed category). Reviewer: K.I.Rosenthal Cited in 4 ReviewsCited in 34 Documents MSC: 18F20 Presheaves and sheaves, stacks, descent conditions (category-theoretic aspects) 06D99 Distributive lattices 81P10 Logical foundations of quantum mechanics; quantum logic (quantum-theoretic aspects) 18F10 Grothendieck topologies and Grothendieck topoi 18B25 Topoi 03G12 Quantum logic Keywords:quantum logic; quantale; locale; complete lattice; binary operation; two- sided elements; Grothendieck topos of sheaves; Grothendieck topology × Cite Format Result Cite Review PDF Full Text: DOI References: [1] W.Arveson (1976) An Invitation to ? #x002A; Algebras, Springer, New York. · Zbl 0344.46123 [2] B.Banaschewski (1983) The power of the ultrafilter theorem, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 27, 193-202. · Zbl 0523.03037 · doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-27.2.193 [3] F.Borceux and G.van denBossche (1983) Algebra in a Localic Topos with Applications to Ring Theory, LNM 1038, Springer, New York. · Zbl 0522.18001 [4] F. Borceux and G. van den Bossche (1985) An essay on non-commutative topology, Rapp. de S?m. de math, Univ. Cath. de Louvain. [5] J.Dixmier (1964) Les ? #x002A;-alg?bres et leurs repr?sentations [6] S.Eilenberg and G. M.Kelly (1966) Closed categories, Proc. La Jolla Conf. on Cat. Alg., Springer, New York, pp. 421-562. · Zbl 0192.10604 [7] P.Freyd and G. M.Kelly (1972) Categories of continuous functors, J Pure Appl. Alg. 2, 169-191. · Zbl 0257.18005 · doi:10.1016/0022-4049(72)90001-1 [8] P.Gabriel and F.Ulmer (1971) Lokal pr?sentierbare Kategorien, LNM 221, Springer, New York. · Zbl 0225.18004 [9] P.Johnstone (1977) Topos Theory, Academic Press, London. · Zbl 0368.18001 [10] P. Johnstone (1982) Stone Spaces, Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 0499.54001 [11] A. Joyal and M. Tierney (1984) A generalization of the Descent Theory of Grothendieck, Memoirs AMS. · Zbl 0541.18002 [12] C. Mulvey (1984) Communications at the meetings in Oberwolfach (1983), Paris and Brighton (1984). [13] Nawaz (1985) Thesis, Sussex University. [14] R. S. Pierce (1967) Modules over Commutative Regular Rings, Memoirs AMS 70. · Zbl 0152.02601 [15] H.Schubert (1972) Categories, Springer, New York. This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.