zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Optimally robust redundancy relations for failure detection in uncertain systems. (English) Zbl 0596.93019
A wide variety of techniques has been proposed for the detection, isolation, and accomodation of failures in dynamic systems. All these methods involve the generation of signals that are accentuated by the presence of particular failures. Since the procedures for generating these signals depend on models relating the observed variables, the model errors may also accentuate the signals. The work described in this article focuses on directly designing a failure detection system that is insensitive to model errors.
A new measure of reliability for a redundancy relation is examined. Not only does this measure have a helpful geometric interpretation, but it also leads to a far simpler optimization procedure, involving a single singular value decomposition. It allows issues such as scaling, relative merits of alternative sensor sets and explicit trade-offs between detectability and robustness to be considered.
The main problem of this paper is the determination of optimally robust redundancy relations. The approach used builds on the geometric interpretation of a set of parity checks as an orthogonal projection of a window of observations. The question of whether the constructions developed in this paper provide a useful new method of model reduction remains for further exploration.
Reviewer: Y.Qu

93B35 Sensitivity (robustness)
90B25 Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection in operations research
93C05 Linear systems in control theory
68U20 Simulation (MSC2010)
Full Text: DOI
[1] Bjorck, A.; Golub, G.H., Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces, Math. comput., 27, 579-594, (1973) · Zbl 0282.65031
[2] Chow, E.Y.; Willsky, A.S., Analytical redundancy and the design of robust failure detection systems, IEEE trans. aut. control, AC-29, 603-615, (1984) · Zbl 0542.90040
[3] Daly, K.C.; Gai, E.; Harrison, J.V., Test for FDI in redundant sensor configurations, AIAA J. guid. control, 2, 9-17, (1979)
[4] Deckert, J.C., Flight test results for the F-8 digital fly-by-wire aircraft control sensor analytic redundancy management technique, (), 491-499
[5] Deckert, J.C.; Desai, M.N.; Deyst, J.J.; Willsky, A.S., F8-DFBW sensor failure detection and identification using analytic redundancy, IEEE trans. aut. control, AC-22, 795-803, (1977)
[6] Desai, M.; Ray, A., A failure detection and isolation methodology, ()
[7] Eckart, C.; Young, G., The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank, Psychometrika, 1, 211-218, (1936) · JFM 62.1075.02
[8] Golub, G.H.; Van Loan, C.F., ()
[9] Hall, S.R., Parity vector compensation for FDI, ()
[10] Isermann, R., Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods-a survey, Automatica, 20, 387-404, (1984) · Zbl 0539.90037
[11] Klema, V.C.; Laub, A.J., The singular value decomposition: its computation and some applications, IEEE trans. aut. control, AC-25, 164-176, (1980) · Zbl 0433.93018
[12] Leininger, G.G., Sensor failure detection with model mismatch, ()
[13] Lou, X.-C., A system failure detection method: the failure projection method, (), also Rep. LIDS-TH-1203, M.I.T. Lab. for Inf. and Dec. Syst. · Zbl 0593.90034
[14] Potter, J.E.; Suman, M.C., Thresholdless redundancy management with arrays of skewed instruments, Integrity in electronic flight control systems, Agardograph-224, 15.1-15.25, (1977)
[15] Tufts, D.W.; Kumaresan, R.; Kirsteins, I., Data adaptive signal estimation by singular value decomposition of a data matrix, (), 684-685
[16] Willsky, A.S., A survey of design methods for failure detection, Automatica, 12, 601-611, (1976) · Zbl 0345.93067
[17] Willsky, A.S.; Chow, E.Y.; Gershwin, S.B.; Greene, C.S.; Houpt, P.K.; Kurkjian, A.L., Dynamic model-based techniques for the detection of incidents on freeways, IEEE trans. aut. control, AC-25, 347-360, (1980) · Zbl 0497.90023
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.