Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. (English) Zbl 0602.90002

This paper extends hierarchical analysis to the case where the participants are allowed to employ fuzzy ratios in place of exact ratios. If a person considers alternative A more important than alternative B, then the ratio used might be approximately 3 to 1, or between 2 to 1, and 4 to 1, or at most 5 to 1. The pairwise comparison of the issues and the criteria in the hierarchy produce fuzzy positive reciprocal matrices. The geometric mean method is employed to calculate the fuzzy weights for each fuzzy matrix, and these are combined in the usual manner to determine the final fuzzy weights for the alternatives. The final fuzzy weights are used to rank the alternatives from highest to lowest. The highest ranking contains all the undominated issues. The procedures easily extends to the situations where many experts are utilized in the ranking process, or to the case of missing data. Two examples are presented showing the final fuzzy weights and the final ranking.


91B06 Decision theory
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
03E72 Theory of fuzzy sets, etc.
Full Text: DOI


[1] Aczel, J.; Saaty, T. L., Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments, J. Math. Psychology, 27, 93-102 (1983) · Zbl 0522.92028
[2] Buckley, J. J., Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 21-31 (1985) · Zbl 0567.90057
[3] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., Operations on fuzzy numbers, Internat. J. Systems Sci., 9, 613-626 (1978) · Zbl 0383.94045
[4] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., Decision-making under fuzziness, (Gupta, M. M.; Ragade, R. K.; Yager, R. R., Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications (1979), North-Holland: North-Holland Amsterdam), 279-302 · Zbl 0434.94026
[5] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., Fuzzy Sets and Systems (1980), Academic Press: Academic Press New York · Zbl 0444.94049
[6] Lootsma, F. A., Performance evaluation of nonlinear optimization methods via multi-criteria decision analysis and via linear model analysis, (Powell, M. J.D., Nonlinear Optimization 1981 (1982), Academic Press: Academic Press London), 419-453 · Zbl 0547.90084
[7] Saaty, T. L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Math. Psychology, 15, 234-281 (1977) · Zbl 0372.62084
[8] Saaty, T. L., Exploring the interface between hierarchies, multiple objectives and fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 57-68 (1978) · Zbl 0378.94001
[9] Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980), McGraw-Hill: McGraw-Hill New York · Zbl 1176.90315
[10] Saaty, T. L.; Vargas, L. G., Inconsistency and rank preservation, J. Math. Psychology, 28, 205-214 (1984) · Zbl 0557.62093
[11] Uppuluri, V. R.R., Logarithmic least-squares approach to Saaty’s decision problems, (Lever, W. E.; Shepherd, D. E.; Ward, R. C.; Wilson, D. G., Mathematics and Statistics Research Department Progress Report (1978), Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37830), 19-21
[12] Uppuluri, V. R.R., Expert opinion and ranking methods, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, NRC FIN No. B044 (1983), Oak Ridge, TN 37830 · Zbl 0538.60018
[13] van Laarhoven, P. J.M.; Pedrycz, W., A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-241 (1983) · Zbl 0528.90054
[14] Wagenknecht, M.; Hartmann, K., On fuzzy rank-ordering in polyoptimization, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 253-264 (1983) · Zbl 0528.90079
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.