×

Generalized adjunction and applications. (English) Zbl 0619.14004

The main purpose of the paper under review is to give a precise description of polarized pairs (X,H), where X is a complex projective manifold of dimension \(r\) and H is an ample divisor on it (not necessarily effective) such that \(K_ X+iH\) is not semiample (respectively ample) for \(1\leq i=r+1, r, r-1, r-2\) (respectively \(i=r+1, r, r-1)\). For example \(K_ X+(r+1)H\) is always semiample and ample except for the case where \(X\simeq {\mathbb{P}}^ r\) and \(H\in | {\mathcal O}(1)|\). Among the exceptions for smaller adjunctions the author obtains scrolls over curves and \(Del\quad Pezzo\quad manifolds\) [T. Fujita, ”On the structure of polarized manifolds with total deficiency one. I, II and III”, J. Math. Soc. Japan 32, 709-725 (1980; Zbl 0474.14017); 33, 415-434 (1981; Zbl 0474.14018); 36, 75-89 (1984; Zbl 0541.14036)].
The exact statement is contained in section \(1.\) Its proof is based on cone [S. Mori, Ann. Math., II. Ser. 116, 133-176 (1982; Zbl 0557.14021)] and contraction theorems [Y. Kawamata, Ann. Math., II. Ser. 119, 603-633 (1984; Zbl 0544.14009)]. Some applications are given in section \(2.\) Here you may find slightly improved results of A. J. Sommese [”The birational theory of hyperplane sections of projective threefolds” (preprint 1981)] and an alternative proof of the Bădescu theorem classifying smooth projective threefolds the support of which is a geometrically ruled surface as an ample divisor and so on.
Reviewer: V.V.Shokurov

MSC:

14C20 Divisors, linear systems, invertible sheaves
14J99 Surfaces and higher-dimensional varieties
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1215/S0012-7094-79-04616-7 · Zbl 0415.14019
[2] Sommese, J. reine angew. Math 329 pp 16– (1981)
[3] DOI: 10.2307/1971241 · Zbl 0423.14006
[4] Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry (1977)
[5] Fujita, j. Math. Soc 32 pp 709– (1980) · Zbl 0474.14017
[6] Fujita, j. Math. Soc 32 pp 153– (1980)
[7] Fujita, J. Fac. Sci. Univ 22 pp 103– (1975)
[8] DOI: 10.1007/BF01457451 · Zbl 0519.14005
[9] Beltrametti, Nagoya Math. J 101 (1986) · Zbl 0599.14036
[10] B?descu, Atti Accad. Ligure Sci. Lett 38 pp 3– (1981)
[11] B?descu, Proceedings of the week of Algebraic Geometry (1980)
[12] B?descu, Nagoya Math. J 86 pp 155– (1982) · Zbl 0445.14002
[13] DOI: 10.2307/2007050 · Zbl 0557.14021
[14] Lanteri, Atti. Accad. Naz. Lincei. Rend 78 (1985)
[15] Lanteri, J. reine angew. Math 352 pp 15– (1984)
[16] Kobayashi, j. Math. Kyoto Univ 13 pp 31– (1973)
[17] Kleiman, Ann. Math 84 pp 293– (1986)
[18] DOI: 10.2307/2007087 · Zbl 0544.14009
[19] DOI: 10.1007/BF01456407 · Zbl 0476.14007
[20] DOI: 10.1070/IM1977v011n03ABEH001733 · Zbl 0382.14013
[21] DOI: 10.1007/BF01456072 · Zbl 0541.14032
[22] Ionescu, Proceedings of the week of Algebraic Geometry 1056 (1982)
[23] Wahl, Inv math 72 pp 351– (1993)
[24] Viehweg, J. reine angew. Math 335 pp 1– (1982)
[25] DOI: 10.1215/S0012-7094-79-04617-9 · Zbl 0458.14003
[26] DOI: 10.1007/BFb0093592
[27] Sommese, The birational theory of hyperplane sections of projective threefolds (1981) · Zbl 0509.14044
[28] Mori, In Algebraic Threefolds 947 (1981)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.