zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Capitalizing on opportunistic data for monitoring relative abundances of species. (English) Zbl 1419.62354
Summary: With the internet, a massive amount of information on species abundance can be collected by citizen science programs. However, these data are often difficult to use directly in statistical inference, as their collection is generally opportunistic, and the distribution of the sampling effort is often not known. In this article, we develop a general statistical framework to combine such “opportunistic data” with data collected using schemes characterized by a known sampling effort. Under some structural assumptions regarding the sampling effort and detectability, our approach makes it possible to estimate the relative abundance of several species in different sites. It can be implemented through a simple generalized linear model. We illustrate the framework with typical bird datasets from the Aquitaine region in south-western France. We show that, under some assumptions, our approach provides estimates that are more precise than the ones obtained from the dataset with a known sampling effort alone. When the opportunistic data are abundant, the gain in precision may be considerable, especially for rare species. We also show that estimates can be obtained even for species recorded only in the opportunistic scheme. Opportunistic data combined with a relatively small amount of data collected with a known effort may thus provide access to accurate and precise estimates of quantitative changes in relative abundance over space and/or time.

62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
GLIM; R; spBayes
Full Text: DOI
[1] Aitkin , M. Anderson , D. Francis , B. Hinde , J. 1989 Statistical Modelling in GLIM · Zbl 0676.62001
[2] Anderson, Aic model selection in overdispersed capture-recapture data, Ecology 75 pp 1780– (1994) · doi:10.2307/1939637
[3] Banerjee , S. Carlin , B. Gelfand , A. 2004 Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data · Zbl 1053.62105
[4] Bland, Correlation in restricted ranges of data, The BMJ 342 pp d556– (2011) · doi:10.1136/bmj.d556
[5] Boutin, Breeding bird monitoring in france: The act survey, Ornis Hungarica 12 pp 1– (2003)
[6] Bray, An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern wisconsin, Ecological Monographs 27 pp 325– (1957) · doi:10.2307/1942268
[7] Buckland , S. Anderson , D. Burnham , K. Laake , J. 1993 Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations · Zbl 1136.62085
[8] Dickinson, The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 pp 291– (2012) · doi:10.1890/110236
[9] Dickinson, Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41 pp 149– (2010) · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
[10] Fithian, Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species, Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6 pp 424– (2015) · doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12242
[11] Gibbons, Mapping avian distributions: The evolution of bird atlases, Bird Study 54 pp 324– (2007) · doi:10.1080/00063650709461492
[12] Goodwin, Understanding correlation: Factors that affect the size of r, The Journal of Experimental Education 74 pp 249– (2006) · doi:10.3200/JEXE.74.3.249-266
[13] Greenacre , M. Primicerio , R. 2013 Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data
[14] Guisan, Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species, Conservation Biology 20 pp 501– (2006) · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00354.x
[15] Hochachka, Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27 pp 130– (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006
[16] Jiguet, French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences, Acta Oecologica 44 pp 58– (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2011.05.003
[17] Julliard, Common birds facing global changes: What makes a species at risk, Global Change Biology 10 pp 148– (2004) · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00723.x
[18] Kéry, Trend estimation in populations with imperfect detection, Journal of Applied Ecology 46 pp 1163– (2009) · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01724.x
[19] Link, Estimation of population trajectories from count data, Biometrics 53 pp 488– (1997) · Zbl 0885.62125 · doi:10.2307/2533952
[20] MacKenzie, How should detection probability be incorporated into estimates of relative abundance, Ecology 83 pp 2387– (2002) · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2387:HSDPBI]2.0.CO;2
[21] MacKenzie, Improving inferences in population studies of rare species that are detected imperfectly, Ecology 86 pp 1101– (2005) · doi:10.1890/04-1060
[22] Malbasa , V. Vucetic , S. 2011 Spatially regularized logistic regression for disease mapping on large moving populations Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1352 1360
[23] McClintock, Experimental investigation of observation error in anuran call surveys, The Journal of Wildlife Management 74 pp 1882– (2010) · doi:10.2193/2009-321
[24] Miller, Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational error occur: non-detection and species misidentification, Ecology 92 pp 1422– (2011) · doi:10.1890/10-1396.1
[25] Phillips, Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data, Ecological Applications 19 pp 181– (2009) · doi:10.1890/07-2153.1
[26] R Core Team 2013 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[27] Royle, N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts, Biometrics 60 pp 108– (2004) · Zbl 1130.62380 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00142.x
[28] Royle, Generalized site occupancy models allowing for false positive and false negative errors, Ecology 87 pp 835– (2006) · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[835:GSOMAF]2.0.CO;2
[29] Seber , G. 1982 The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters · Zbl 0272.92017
[30] van Strien, Indexing european bird population trends using results of national monitoring schemes: A trial of a new method, Bird Study 48 pp 200– (2001) · doi:10.1080/00063650109461219
[31] van Swaay, Butterfly monitoring in europe: methods, applications and perspectives, Biodiversity and Conservation 17 pp 3455– (2008) · doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9491-4
[32] Williams , B. Nichols , J. Conroy , M. 2002 Analysis and Management of Animal Populations: Modeling, Estimation, and Decision Making
[33] Yesson, How global is the global biodiversity information facility, PLoS One 2 pp e1124– (2007) · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001124
[34] Yoccoz, Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16 pp 446– (2001) · doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02205-4
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.