Practical application of the stochastic finite element method. (English) Zbl 1348.65160

Summary: The stochastic finite element method is an extension of the FEM that considers the uncertainty of a system that arises through variations in initial conditions, materials or geometry. Systems which display a measurable degree of disorder can be studied efficiently using a probabilistic approach. Different scenarios can be randomly generated with the SFEM to study the behaviour of systems that take into account prior knowledge of the differing variations in properties. This review paper introduces the most commonly used techniques: direct Monte Carlo simulation, the perturbation method and the spectral stochastic finite element method. It then looks at the currently available software for the SFEM and provides examples from the disciplines of materials science, biomechanics and engineering to illustrate different procedures by which the SFEM is practically used. The aim of the paper is to help scientists and engineers quickly assess how they might apply SFEM to their own research and guide them towards key publications.


65N30 Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
65N75 Probabilistic methods, particle methods, etc. for boundary value problems involving PDEs
65C05 Monte Carlo methods
Full Text: DOI


[1] Hughes I, Hase TPA (2010) Measurements and their uncertainties: a practical guide to modern error analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford · Zbl 1205.00005
[2] Schueller, GI, Developments in stochastic structural mechanics, Arch Appl Mech, 75, 755-773, (2006) · Zbl 1168.74398
[3] Hurtado, JE; Barbat, AH, Monte Carlo techniques in computational stochastic mechanics, Arch Comput Method Eng, 5, 3-29, (1998)
[4] Moens, D; Vandepitte, D, Recent advances in non-probabilistic approaches for non-deterministic dynamic finite element analysis, Arch Comput Methods Eng, 13, 389-464, (2006) · Zbl 1105.74043
[5] Timoshenko SP (1958) Strength of materials, 3rd edn. Van Nostrand, Princeton
[6] Young WC, Budynas RG, Sadegh AM, Roark RJ (2012) (eds) Roark’s formulas for stress and strain. 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
[7] Kiureghian, A; Ke, J-B, The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability, Probab Eng Mech, 3, 83-91, (1988)
[8] Contreras, H, The stochastic finite-element method, Comput Struct, 12, 341-348, (1980) · Zbl 0441.73091
[9] Cassidy, MJ; Uzielli, M; Tian, YH, Probabilistic combined loading failure envelopes of a strip footing on spatially variable soil, Comput Geotech, 49, 191-205, (2013)
[10] Fenton GA, Griffiths DV (2008) Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, Hoboken
[11] Liu, WK; Belytschko, T; Mani, A, Random field finite-elements, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 23, 1831-1845, (1986) · Zbl 0597.73075
[12] Liu, WK; Mani, A; Belytschko, T, Finite element methods in probabilistic mechanics, Probab Eng Mech, 2, 201-213, (1987)
[13] Sudret B, Der Kiureghian A (2000) Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: a state-of-the-art report (trans: Engineering DoCE). University of California, Berkeley
[14] To CSS (2001) On computational stochastic structural dynamics applying finite elements. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8(1):3-40. doi:10.1007/Bf02736683 · Zbl 0616.52007
[15] Vanmarcke, E; Shinozuka, M; Nakagiri, S; Schueller, GI; Grigoriu, M, Random-fields and stochastic finite-elements, Struct Saf, 3, 143-166, (1986)
[16] Stefanou G (2009) The stochastic finite element method: past, present and future. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(9-12):1031-1051. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2008.11.007 · Zbl 1229.74140
[17] Schueller, GI, Special issue—a state-of-the-art report on computational stochastic mechanics, Probab Eng Mech, 12, 197-321, (1997)
[18] Pellissetti, MF; Schueller, GI, On general purpose software in structural reliability: an overview, Struct Saf, 28, 3-16, (2006)
[19] Soize, C, Stochastic modeling of uncertainties in computational structural dynamics—recent theoretical advances, J Sound Vib, 332, 2379-2395, (2013)
[20] Astill, CJ; Imosseir, SB; Shinozuka, M, Impact loading on structures with random properties, J Struct Mech, 1, 63-77, (1972)
[21] Ghanem R, Spanos PD (1991) Stochastic finite elements: a spectral approach. Springer, New York · Zbl 0722.73080
[22] Vanmarcke E (1983) Random fields: analysis and synthesis. MIT Press, London · Zbl 1206.60051
[23] Vanmarcke, E; Grigoriu, M, Stochastic finite-element analysis of simple beams, J Eng Mech-Asce, 109, 1203-1214, (1983) · Zbl 0517.73009
[24] Matheron G (1973) The intrinsic random functions and their applications. Adv Appl Probab 5(3):439-468. doi:10.2307/1425829 · Zbl 0324.60036
[25] Yaglom AM (1962) An introduction to the theory of stationary random functions, Rev. English/translated and edited by Richard A. Silverman (edn) Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
[26] Fenton, GA; Vanmarcke, EH, Simulation of random-fields via local average subdivision, J Eng Mech-Asce, 116, 1733-1749, (1990)
[27] Sriramula, S; Chryssanthopoulos, MK, Quantification of uncertainty modelling in stochastic analysis of FRP composites, Compos Part A Appl Sci, 40, 1673-1684, (2009)
[28] Charmpis DC, Schueller GI, Pellissetti MF (2007) The need for linking micromechanics of materials with stochastic finite elements: A challenge for materials science. Comput Mater Sci 41(1):27-37. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.02.014
[29] Jimenez, R; Sitar, N, The importance of distribution types on finite element analyses of foundation settlement, Comput Geotech, 36, 474-483, (2009)
[30] Jeulin, D, Random texture models for material structures, Stat Comput, 10, 121-132, (2000)
[31] Torquato S (2002) Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties. Interdisciplinary applied mathematics vol. 16. Springer, New York · Zbl 0988.74001
[32] Yeong, CLY; Torquato, S, Reconstructing random media. II. three-dimensional media from two-dimensiomal cuts, Phys Rev E, 58, 224-233, (1998)
[33] Feng JW, Li CF, Cen S, Owen DRJ Statistical reconstruction of two-phase random media. Comput Struct. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.03.019
[34] Eschricht, N; Hoinkis, E; Madler, F; Schubert-Bischoff, P; Rohl-Kuhn, B, Knowledge-based reconstruction of random porous media, J Colloid Interface Sci, 291, 201-213, (2005)
[35] Ostoja-Starzewski M (2008) Microstructural randomness and scaling in mechanics of materials. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London · Zbl 1148.74002
[36] Schueller, GI; Pradlwarter, HJ, Uncertain linear systems in dynamics: retrospective and recent developments by stochastic approaches, Eng Struct, 31, 2507-2517, (2009)
[37] Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis. Wiley, New York
[38] Schuëller, GI; Pradlwarter, HJ, Benchmark study on reliability estimation in higher dimensions of structural systems—an overview, Struct Saf, 29, 167-182, (2007)
[39] Papadrakakis, M; Kotsopulos, A, Parallel solution methods for stochastic finite element analysis using Monte Carlo simulation, Comput Methods Appl Mech, 168, 305-320, (1999) · Zbl 0956.74063
[40] Schueller, GI, Computational stochastic mechanics—recent advances, Comput Struct, 79, 2225-2234, (2001)
[41] Johnson, EA; Wojtkiewicz, SF; Bergman, LA; Spencer, BF, Observations with regard to massively parallel computation for Monte Carlo simulation of stochastic dynamical systems, Int J Nonlinear Mech, 32, 721-734, (1997) · Zbl 0900.70359
[42] Ariaratnam ST, Schueller GI, Elishakoff I (1988) Stochastic structural dynamics: progress in theory and applications. Elsevier Applied Science, London · Zbl 0731.73046
[43] Elishakoff I, Ren Y (2003) Finite element methods for structures with large stochastic variations. Oxford texts in applied and engineering mathematics, vol 7. Oxford University Press, Oxford · Zbl 1037.74001
[44] Kleiber M, Tran DH (1992) The stochastic finite element method: basic perturbation technique and computer implementation. Wiley, London · Zbl 0902.73004
[45] Ghanem RG, Kruger RM (1996) Numerical solution of spectral stochastic finite element systems. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 129(3):289-303. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(95)00909-4 · Zbl 1104.65008
[46] Nouy, A, Recent developments in spectral stochastic methods for the numerical solution of stochastic partial differential equations, Arch Comput Methods Eng, 16, 251-285, (2009) · Zbl 1360.65036
[47] Ghanem, R, Ingredients for a general purpose stochastic finite elements implementation, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 168, 19-34, (1999) · Zbl 0943.65008
[48] Frauenfelder, P; Schwab, C; Todor, RA, Finite elements for elliptic problems with stochastic coefficients, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 194, 205-228, (2005) · Zbl 1143.65392
[49] Schwab, C; Todor, RA, Karhunen-loeve approximation of random fields by generalized fast multipole methods, J Comput Phys, 217, 100-122, (2006) · Zbl 1104.65008
[50] Phoon, KK; Huang, SP; Quek, ST, Implementation of Karhunen-loeve expansion for simulation using a wavelet-Galerkin scheme, Probab Eng Mech, 17, 293-303, (2002)
[51] Ghanem, R, Hybrid stochastic finite elements and generalized Monte Carlo simulation, J Appl Mech-T Asme, 65, 1004-1009, (1998)
[52] Blatman, G; Sudret, B, Sparse polynomial chaos expansions and adaptive stochastic finite elements using a regression approach, Comptes Rendus Mecanique, 336, 518-523, (2008) · Zbl 1138.74046
[53] Blatman, G; Sudret, B, Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression, J Comput Phys, 230, 2345-2367, (2011) · Zbl 1210.65019
[54] Pascual, B; Adhikari, S, A reduced polynomial chaos expansion method for the stochastic finite element analysis, Sadhana, 37, 319-340, (2012) · Zbl 1322.60137
[55] Pradlwarter, HJ; Schueller, GI, On advanced Monte Carlo simulation procedures in stochastic structural dynamics, Int J Nonlinear Mech, 32, 735-744, (1997) · Zbl 0892.73080
[56] Schueller, GI; Pradlwarter, HJ; Bucher, CG, Efficient computational procedures for reliability estimates of MDOF-systems, Int J Nonlinear Mech, 26, 961-974, (1991) · Zbl 0850.70265
[57] Melchers RE (1999) Structural reliability: analysis and prediction, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
[58] Patelli, E; Panayirci, HM; Broggi, M; Goller, B; Beaurepaire, P; Pradlwarter, HJ; Schueller, GI, General purpose software for efficient uncertainty management of large finite element models, Finite Elem Anal Des, 51, 31-48, (2012)
[59] Smith IM, Griffiths DV (2004) Programming the finite element method, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken · Zbl 1091.74002
[60] Margetts L (2002) Parallel finite element analysis. University of Manchester, Manchester
[61] Smith, IM; Margetts, L, The convergence variability of parallel iterative solvers, Eng Comput, 23, 154-165, (2006) · Zbl 1182.65211
[62] Smith IM, Griffiths DV, Margetts L (2013) Programming the finite element method, 5th edn. Wiley, London
[63] Abaqus: keywords manual: version 6.2 (2001) Pawtucket: Hibbitt. Karlsson & Sorensen, Pawtucket
[64] Shang, S; Yun, GJ, Stochastic finite element with material uncertainties: implementation in a general purpose simulation program, Finite Elem Anal Des, 64, 65-78, (2012) · Zbl 1282.76125
[65] Eiermann M, Ernst O, Ullmann E (2007) Computational aspects of the stochastic finite element method. Comput Vis Sci 10(1):3-15. doi:10.1007/s00791-006-0047-4 · Zbl 1123.65004
[66] Reh, S; Beley, JD; Mukherjee, S; Khor, EH, Probabilistic finite element analysis using ANSYS, Struct Saf, 28, 17-43, (2006)
[67] Kiureghian, A; Haukaas, T; Fujimura, K, Structural reliability software at the university of California, Berkeley, Struct Saf, 28, 44-67, (2006)
[68] Schueller GI, Pradlwarter HJ (2006) Computational stochastic structural analysis (COSSAN)—a software tool. Struct Saf 28(1-2):68-82. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.005 · Zbl 0892.73080
[69] Pellissetti, MF; Schueller, GI, Scalable uncertainty and reliability analysis by integration of advanced Monte Carlo simulation and generic finite element solvers, Comput Struct, 87, 930-947, (2009)
[70] Thacker, BH; Riha, DS; Fitch, SHK; Huyse, LJ; Pleming, JB, Probabilistic engineering analysis using the NESSUS software, Struct Saf, 28, 83-107, (2006)
[71] Gollwitzer, S; Kirchgassner, B; Fischer, R; Rackwitz, R, PERMAS-RA/STRUREL system of programs for probabilistic reliability analysis, Struct Saf, 28, 108-129, (2006)
[72] Lemaire M, Pendola M (2006) Phimeca-soft. Struct Saf 28(1-2):130-149. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.007
[73] Tvedt L (2006) Proban—probabilistic analysis. Struct Saf 28(1-2):150-163. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.003 · Zbl 1138.74046
[74] Wu YT, Shin Y, Sues RH, Cesare MA (2006) Probabilistic function evaluation system (ProFES) for reliability-based design. Struct Saf 28(1-2):164-195. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.006 · Zbl 1104.65008
[75] Lin, HZ; Khalessi, MR, General outlook of UNIPASS (TM) V5.0: a general-purpose probabilistic software system, Struct Saf, 28, 196-216, (2006)
[76] Spanos, PD; Kontsos, A, A multiscale Monte Carlo finite element method for determining mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites, Probab Eng Mech, 23, 456-470, (2008)
[77] Johnson, J; Qu, J, Effective modulus and coefficient of thermal expansion of ni-YSZ porous cermets, J Power Sources, 181, 85-92, (2008)
[78] Sakata S, Ashida F, Ohsumimoto K (2013) Stochastic homogenization analysis of a porous material with the perturbation method considering a microscopic geometrical random variation. Int J Mech Sci 77:145-154. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.10.001 · Zbl 1143.65392
[79] Asprone, D; Auricchio, F; Menna, C; Morganti, S; Prota, A; Reali, A, Statistical finite element analysis of the buckling behavior of honeycomb structures, Compos Struct, 105, 240-255, (2013)
[80] Geißendörfer M, Liebscher A, Proppe C, Redenbach C, Schwarzer D: Stochastic multiscale modeling of metal foams. Probab Eng Mech. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.06.006 · Zbl 1360.65036
[81] Jeong, G; Hindman, D, Ultimate tensile strength of loblolly pine strands using stochastic finite element method, J Mater Sci, 44, 3824-3832, (2009)
[82] Niemeyer, F; Wilke, HJ; Schmidt, H, Geometry strongly influences the response of numerical models of the lumbar spine—a probabilistic finite element analysis, J Biomech, 45, 1414-1423, (2012)
[83] Berthaume MA, Dechow PC, Iriarte-Diaz J, Ross CF, Strait DS, Wang Q, Grosse IR (2012) Probabilistic finite element analysis of a craniofacial finite element model. J Theor Biol 300:242-253. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.01.031 · Zbl 1397.92043
[84] Donaldson FE, Coburn JC, Siegel KL (2014) Total hip arthroplasty head-neck contact mechanics: a stochastic investigation of key parameters. J Biomech 47(7):1634-1641. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.035
[85] Arsene, CTC; Gabrys, B, Probabilistic finite element predictions of the human lower limb model in total knee replacement, Med Eng Phys, 35, 1116-1132, (2013)
[86] Luo, Q; Nakade, R; Dong, X; Rong, Q; Wang, X, Effect of mineral-collagen interfacial behavior on the microdamage progression in bone using a probabilistic cohesive finite element model, J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 4, 943-952, (2011)
[87] Celi, S; Berti, S, Three-dimensional sensitivity assessment of thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stress: a probabilistic finite-element study, Eur J Cardio-Thorac, 45, 467-475, (2014)
[88] Paiboon J, Griffiths DV, Huang JS, Fenton GA (2013) Numerical analysis of effective elastic properties of geomaterials containing voids using 3D random fields and finite elements. Int J Solids Struct 50(20-21):3233-3241. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.031
[89] Fang, Q; Zhang, J, 3D numerical modeling of projectile penetration into rock-rubble overlays accounting for random distribution of rock-rubble, Int J Impact Eng, 63, 118-128, (2014)
[90] Vryzidis I, Stefanou G, Papadopoulos V (2013) Stochastic stability analysis of steel tubes with random initial imperfections. Finite Elem Anal Des 77:31-39. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2013.09.002
[91] Castillo D, Caro S (2014) Probabilistic modeling of air void variability of asphalt mixtures in flexible pavements. Constr Build Mater 61:138-146. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.075
[92] Guo, T; Frangopol, DM; Chen, Y, Fatigue reliability assessment of steel bridge details integrating weigh-in-motion data and probabilistic finite element analysis, Comput Struct, 112-113, 245-257, (2012)
[93] Njuguna, B; Pielichowski, K, Polymer nanocomposites for aerospace applications: properties, Adv Eng Mater, 5, 769-778, (2003)
[94] Hill, R, Elastic properties of reinforced solids—some theoretical principles, J Mech Phys Solids, 11, 357-372, (1963) · Zbl 0114.15804
[95] Benveniste, Y, A new approach to the application of Mori-Tanaka theory in composite-materials, Mech Mater, 6, 147-157, (1987)
[96] Nemat-Nasser S, Hori M (1993) Micromechanics: overall properties of heterogeneous materials. North-Holland, London · Zbl 0924.73006
[97] Odegard, GM; Gates, TS; Wise, KE; Park, C; Siochi, EJ, Constitutive modeling of nanotube-reinforced polymer composites, Compos Sci Technol, 63, 1671-1687, (2003)
[98] Hatami-Marbini, H; Shahsavari, A; Picu, RC, Multiscale modeling of semiflexible random fibrous structures, Comput-Aided Des, 45, 77-83, (2013)
[99] Yavari, V; Kadivar, MH, Application of stochastic finite element method in estimation of elastic constants for NCF composites, Mech Res Commun, 40, 69-76, (2012)
[100] Dincer I, Colpan CO (2013) Introduction to Stationary Fuel Cells. In: Solid oxide fuel cells: from materials to system modeling. The Royal Society of Chemistry, pp 1-25. doi:10.1039/9781849737777-00001
[101] Fergus JW (2009) Solid oxide fuel cells: materials properties and performances. CRC, Taylor & Francis [distributor], Boca Raton, Fla., London
[102] Singhal SC, Kendall K (2003) High-temperature solid oxide fuel cells: fundamentals, design, and applicatons. Elsevier Advanced Technology, New York
[103] Lee, K; Moorthy, S; Ghosh, S, Multiple scale computational model for damage in composite materials, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 172, 175-201, (1999) · Zbl 0972.74063
[104] Rozman, MG; Utz, M, Efficient reconstruction of multiphase morphologies from correlation functions, Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys, 63, 066701, (2001)
[105] Hashin, Z; Shtrikman, S, A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials, J Mech Phys Solids, 11, 127-140, (1963) · Zbl 0108.36902
[106] Radovic M, Lara-Curzio E, Trejo RM, Wang H, Porter WD (2008) Thermophysical properties of YSZ and Ni-YSZ as a function of temperature and porosity. In: Advances in solid oxide fuel cells II: ceramic engineering and science proceedings. Wiley, London, pp 79-85. doi:10.1002/9780470291337.ch8
[107] Faisst, TA, Determination of the critical exponent of the linear thermal expansion coefficient of nickel by neutron diffraction, J Phys Condens Matter, 1, 5805, (1989)
[108] Guedes, J; Kikuchi, N, Preprocessing and postprocessing for materials based on the homogenization method with adaptive finite element methods, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 83, 143-198, (1990) · Zbl 0737.73008
[109] Yu, YL; Ye, JR; Wang, Y; Zhang, BM; Qi, GC, A mesoscale ultrasonic attenuation finite element model of composites with random-distributed voids, Compos Sci Technol, 89, 44-51, (2013)
[110] Combescure A (1997) Influence of initial imperfections on the collapse of thin walled structures. In: Predeleanu M, Gilormini P (eds) Studies in applied mechanics, volume 45. Elsevier, pp 385-394. doi:10.1016/S0922-5382(97)80040-2
[111] Bazant ZP, Cedolin L (1991) Stability of structures: elastic, inelastic, fracture, and damage theories. Dover Publications, NY · Zbl 0744.73001
[112] Flores, EIS; DiazDelaO, FA; Friswell, MI; Sienz, J, A computational multi-scale approach for the stochastic mechanical response of foam-filled honeycomb cores, Compos Struct, 94, 1861-1870, (2012)
[113] Sotomayor OE, Tippur HV (2014) Role of cell regularity and relative density on elasto-plastic compression response of random honeycombs generated using Voronoi diagrams. Int J Solids Struct 51(21-22):3776-3786. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.07.009
[114] MAVI-modular algorithms for volume images. Fraunhofer ITWM, Department Image Processing. (2014). http://www.itwm.fraunhofer.de/en/departments/image-processing/microstructure-analysis/mavi.html
[115] Ohser J, Schladitz K (2009) 3D images of materials structures: processing and analysis. Wiley, Weinheim · Zbl 1165.94306
[116] Aurenhammer, F, Power diagrams—properties, algorithms and applications, SIAM J Comput, 16, 78-96, (1987) · Zbl 0616.52007
[117] Siegkas, P; Tagarielli, V; Petrinic, N, Modelling stochastic foam geometries for FE simulations using 3D Voronoi cells, Proc Mater Sci, 4, 212-217, (2014)
[118] Jeong G (2008) Tensile properties of loblolly pine strands using digital image correlation and stochastic finite element method Virginia. Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg
[119] Tsai SW (1968) Strength theories of filamentary structures, fundamental aspects of fiber reinforced plastic composites. Wiley, London
[120] Laz, PJ; Browne, M, A review of probabilistic analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics, Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 224, 927-943, (2010)
[121] Kurtz SM, Edidin AA (2006) Spine technology handbook. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam
[122] Strait, DS; Wang, Q; Dechow, PC; Ross, CF; Richmond, BG; Spencer, MA; Patel, BA, Modeling elastic properties in finite element analysis: how much precision is needed to produce an accurate model?, Anat Rec Part A, 283A, 275-287, (2005)
[123] Wang, Q; Dechow, PC, Elastic properties of external cortical bone in the craniofacial skeleton of the rhesus monkey, Am J Phys Anthropol, 131, 402-415, (2006)
[124] Ross, CF; Berthaume, MA; Dechow, PC; Iriarte-Diaz, J; Porro, LB; Richmond, BG; Spencer, M; Strait, D, In vivo bone strain and finite-element modeling of the craniofacial haft in catarrhine primates, J Anatomy, 218, 112-141, (2011)
[125] PAM-OPT users manual (2007) 75761 Paris Cedex, 16. ESI Group, Rue Hamelin, France
[126] PAM-CRASH user manual (2007) 75761 Paris Cedex, 16. ESI Group, Rue Hamelin, France
[127] Dong, XN; Luo, Q; Sparkman, DM; Millwater, HR; Wang, X, Random field assessment of nanoscopic inhomogeneity of bone, Bone, 47, 1080-1084, (2010)
[128] Tai K, Dao M, Suresh S, Palazoglu A, Ortiz C (2007) Nanoscale heterogeneity promotes energy dissipation in bone. Nat Mater 6(6):454-462. http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v6/n6/suppinfo/nmat1911_S1.html
[129] Griffiths, DV; Paiboon, J; Huang, JS; Fenton, GA, Homogenization of geomaterials containing voids by random fields and finite elements, Int J Solids Struct, 49, 2006-2014, (2012) · Zbl 1247.68022
[130] Yao LH, He PP, Song SK (2010) A perturbation stochastic finite-element method for groundwater flow models based on an undetermined-coefficients approach. Hydrogeol J 18(7):1603-1609. doi:10.1007/s10040-010-0639-4
[131] Cavdar, O; Bayraktar, A; Adanur, S, Stochastic finite element analysis of a cable-stayed bridge system with varying material properties, Probab Eng Mech, 25, 279-289, (2010)
[132] Cavdar O, Bayraktar A, Adanur S, Basaga HB (2010) Stochastic finite element analysis of long-span bridges with CFRP cables under earthquake ground motion. Sadhana 35(3):341-354 · Zbl 1196.74268
[133] LS-DYNA (2006) Keyword user’s manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, California
[134] Holmqust TJ, Johnson GR, Cook WH (1993) A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures. In: 14th ballistics international symposium vol 2 · Zbl 1105.74043
[135] Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: 7th international symposium on ballisitics · Zbl 0616.52007
[136] Langheim H, Schmolinske E, Stilp AJ, Pahl H (1993) Subscale penetration tests with bombs and advanced penetrators against hardened structures, In: 6th international symposium, interaction of nonnuclear munitions with structures
[137] Eder F, Industries C (1984) Collapse tests of fabricated cylinders under combined axial compression and external pressure: final report. CBI Industries
[138] Schillinger, D; Papadopoulos, V, Accurate estimation of evolutionary power spectra for strongly narrow-band random fields, Comput Method Appl Mech Eng, 199, 947-960, (2010) · Zbl 1227.74122
[139] Shinozuka M, Deodatis G (1996) Simulation of multi-dimensional Gaussian stochastic fields by spectral representation. Appl Mech Rev 49(1):29-53. doi:10.1115/1.3101883
[140] Combescure, A, Influence of initial imperfections on the collapse of thin walled structures, Stud Appl Mech, 45, 385-394, (1997)
[141] Kamiński M, Świta P Structural stability and reliability of the underground steel tanks with the Stochastic finite element method. Arch Civ Mech Eng. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2014.04.010
[142] Chryssanthopoulos MK, Poggi C (1995) Stochastic imperfection modelling in shell buckling studies. Thin-Walled Struct 23 (1-4):179-200. doi:10.1016/0263-8231(95)00011-2
[143] Papadopoulos, V; Stefanou, G; Papadrakakis, M, Buckling analysis of imperfect shells with stochastic non-Gaussian material and thickness properties, Int J Solids Struct, 46, 2800-2808, (2009) · Zbl 1167.74427
[144] Mahadevan, S; Haldar, A, Practical random field discretization in stochastic finite-element analysis, Struct Saf, 9, 283-304, (1991)
[145] Sudret, B; Kiureghian, AD, Comparison of finite element reliability methods, Probab Eng Mech, 17, 337-348, (2002)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.