×

Total variation superiorization in dual-energy CT reconstruction for proton therapy treatment planning. (English) Zbl 1362.92038

MSC:

92C55 Biomedical imaging and signal processing
92C50 Medical applications (general)
78A45 Diffraction, scattering

Software:

PRaVDA; GEANT4
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Schneider U, Pedroni E and Lomax A 1996 The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning Phys. Med. Biol.41 111
[2] Schaffner B and Pedroni E 1998 The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power Phys. Med. Biol.43 1579
[3] Paganetti H 2012 Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations Phys. Med. Biol.57 R99
[4] Unkelbach J, Chan T C and Bortfeld T 2007 Accounting for range uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy Phys. Med. Biol.52 2755
[5] Yang M, Zhu X R, Park P C, Titt U, Mohan R, Virshup G, Clayton J E and Dong L 2012 Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration Phys. Med. Biol.57 4095
[6] Naimuddin M, Coutrakon G, Blazey G, Boi S, Dyshkant A, Erdelyi B, Hedin D, Johnson E, Krider J and Rukalin V 2016 Development of a proton computed tomography detector system J. Instrum.11 C02012
[7] Price T and PRaVDA Consortium 2016 PRaVDA: high energy physics towards proton computed tomography Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 824 226–7
[8] Scaringella M, Brianzi M, Bruzzi M, Bucciolini M, Carpinelli M, Cirrone G A P, Civinini C, Cuttone G, Presti D L and Pallotta S 2013 The PRIMA (PRoton IMAging) collaboration: development of a proton computed tomography apparatus Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 730 178–83
[9] Karonis N T, Duffin K L, Ordoñez C E, Erdelyi B, Uram T D, Olson E C, Coutrakon G and Papka M E 2013 Distributed and hardware accelerated computing for clinical medical imaging using proton computed tomography (pCT) J. Parallel Distrib. Comput.73 1605–12
[10] Penfold S, Schulte R W, Censor Y and Rosenfeld A B 2010 Total variation superiorization schemes in proton computed tomography image reconstruction Med. Phys.37 5887–95
[11] Chen G T, Singh R P, Castro J R, Lyman J T and Quivey J M 1979 Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.5 1809–19
[12] Yang M, Virshup G, Clayton J, Zhu X, Mohan R and Dong L 2010 Theoretical variance analysis of single-and dual-energy computed tomography methods for calculating proton stopping power ratios of biological tissues Phys. Med. Biol.55 1343
[13] Hünemohr N, Paganetti H, Greilich S, Jäkel O and Seco J 2014 Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy Med. Phys.41 061714
[14] Hansen D C, Seco J, Sørensen T S, Petersen J B B, Wildberger J E, Verhaegen F and Landry G 2015 A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark Acta Oncol.54 1638–42
[15] Hudobivnik N, Schwarz F, Johnson T, Agolli L, Dedes G, Tessonnier T, Verhaegen F, Thieke C, Belka C and Sommer W H 2016 Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images Med. Phys.43 495–504
[16] Zhu J and Penfold S N 2016 Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning Med. Phys.43 2845–54
[17] Brooks R A 1977 A quantitative theory of the Hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.1 487–93
[18] Landry G, Gaudreault M, van Elmpt W, Wildberger J E and Verhaegen F 2016 Improved dose calculation accuracy for low energy brachytherapy by optimizing dual energy CT imaging protocols for noise reduction using sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction Z. Med. Phys.26 75–87
[19] Agostinelli S 2003 Geant4 collaboration Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506 01368
[20] ICRU 1989 Tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry and measurement International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 44 (The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements)
[21] Shepp L A and Logan B F 1974 The Fourier reconstruction of a head section IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.21 21–43
[22] Rudin L I, Osher S and Fatemi E 1992 Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms Physica D 60 259–68 · Zbl 0780.49028
[23] Chambolle A 2004 An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications J. Math. Imaging Vis.20 89–97
[24] Osher S, Burger M, Goldfarb D, Xu J and Yin W 2005 An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration Multiscale Model. Simul.4 460–89 · Zbl 1090.94003
[25] Vogel C R and Oman M E 1996 Iterative methods for total variation denoising SIAM J. Sci. Comput.17 227–38 · Zbl 0847.65083
[26] Herman G T, Lent A and Rowland S W 1973 ART: mathematics and applications: a report on the mathematical foundations and on the applicability to real data of the algebraic reconstruction techniques J. Theor. Biol.42 1–32
[27] Cimmino G 1938 Calcolo approssimato per le soluzioni dei sistemi di equazioni lineari La Ricerca Scientifica II9 326–33 · JFM 64.1244.02
[28] Aharoni R and Censor Y 1989 Block-iterative projection methods for parallel computation of solutions to convex feasibility problems Linear Algebr. Appl.120 165–75 · Zbl 0679.65046
[29] Hudson H M and Larkin R S 1994 Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging13 601–9
[30] Censor Y, Gordon D and Gordon R 2001 BICAV: a block-iterative parallel algorithm for sparse systems with pixel-related weighting IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging20 1050–60
[31] Censor Y, Elfving T, Herman G T and Nikazad T 2008 On diagonally relaxed orthogonal projection methods SIAM J. Sci. Comput.30 473–504 · Zbl 1159.65317
[32] Andersen A H and Kak A C 1984 Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): a superior implementation of the ART algorithm Ultrason. Imaging6 81–94
[33] Censor Y, Elfving T and Herman G 2001 Averaging strings of sequential iterations for convex feasibility problems Stud. Comput. Math.8 101–13 · Zbl 1160.65320
[34] Penfold S N 2010 Image reconstruction and Monte Carlo simulations in the development of proton computed tomography for applications in proton radiation therapy PhD Thesis University of Wollongong, Australia
[35] Combettes P L and Luo J 2002 An adaptive level set method for nondifferentiable constrained image recovery IEEE Trans. Image Process.11 1295–304
[36] Bichsel H 1972 Passage of Charged Particles through Matter (American Institute of Physics Handbook) (Berkeley, CA: California University)
[37] Schneider W, Bortfeld T and Schlegel W 2000 Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions Phys. Med. Biol.45 459
[38] Saito M 2012 Potential of dual-energy subtraction for converting CT numbers to electron density based on a single linear relationship Med. Phys.39 2021–30
[39] Chvetsov A V and Paige S L 2010 The influence of CT image noise on proton range calculation in radiotherapy planning Phys. Med. Biol.55 N141
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.