## Weak and strong form shape hessians and their automatic generation.(English)Zbl 1448.49036

### MSC:

 49M15 Newton-type methods 65D18 Numerical aspects of computer graphics, image analysis, and computational geometry 68T35 Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence 68Q42 Grammars and rewriting systems 68U05 Computer graphics; computational geometry (digital and algorithmic aspects) 68U15 Computing methodologies for text processing; mathematical typography

### Software:

revolve; FEMorph; FEniCS; Firedrake; UFL; ISTL
Full Text:

### References:

 [1] T. Albring, M. Sagebaum, and N. R. Gauger, A consistent and robust discrete adjoint solver for the SU$$^2$$ framework—validation and application, Notes Numer. Fluid Mech. Multidiscip. Design, 132 (2016), pp. 77–86. [2] M. Aln\ae s, A Compiler Framework for Automatic Linearization and Efficient Discretization of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo, 2009. [3] M. S. Aln\ae s, A. Logg, K. B. Ø lgaard, M. E. Rognes, and G. N. Wells, Unified form language: A domain-specific language for weak formulations of partial differential equations, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 40 (2014), pp. 9:1–9:37. [4] M. Berggren, A unified discrete-continuous sensitivity analysis method for shape optimization, in Applied and Numerical Partial Differential Equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Sci. 15, Springer, New York, 2010, pp. 25–39. · Zbl 1186.65078 [5] M. Blatt and P. Bastian, The Iterative Solver Template Library, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 666–675. [6] C. Brandenburg, F. Lindemann, M. Ulbrich, and S. Ulbrich, Advanced Numerical Methods for PDE Constrained Optimization with Application to Optimal Design in Navier Stokes Flow, Springer, Basel, 2012, pp. 257–275. · Zbl 1356.49019 [7] A. Carnarius, F. Thiele, E. Özkaya, and N. Gauger, Adjoint Approaches for Optimal Flow Control, Report 2010-5088, AIAA, 2010. [8] B. Christianson, Reverse accumulation and attractive fixed points, Optim. Methods Softw., 3 (1994), pp. 311–326. [9] M. C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries: Metrics, Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization, 2nd ed., Adv. Design Control 22, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2011, . · Zbl 1251.49001 [10] G. Doğan and R. H. Nochetto, First variation of the general curvature-dependent surface energy, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 46 (2012), pp. 59–79. · Zbl 1270.49042 [11] P. E. Farrell, D. A. Ham, S. W. Funke, and M. E. Rognes, Automated derivation of the adjoint of high-level transient finite element programs, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 35 (2013), pp. C369–C393, . · Zbl 1362.65103 [12] H. Garcke, C. Hecht, M. Hinze, and C. Kahle, Numerical approximation of phase field based shape and topology optimization for fluids, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 37 (2015), pp. A1846–A1871, . · Zbl 1322.35113 [13] N. Gauger, A. Walther, C. Moldenhauer, and M. Widhalm, Automatic Differentiation of an Entire Design Chain for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 454–461. [14] A. Griewank and G. F. Corliss, eds., Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1991. [15] A. Griewank and A. Walther, Algorithm \textup799: Revolve: An implementation of checkpointing for the reverse or adjoint mode of computational differentiation, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 26 (2000), pp. 19–45. · Zbl 1137.65330 [16] A. Griewank and A. Walther, Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2008, . · Zbl 1159.65026 [17] M. Hintermüller and W. Ring, A second order shape optimization approach for image segmentation, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2003), pp. 442–467, . · Zbl 1073.68095 [18] A. Jameson, Aerodynamic design via control theory, J. Sci. Comput., 3 (1988), pp. 233–260. · Zbl 0676.76055 [19] A. Kowarz and A. Walther, Optimal checkpointing for time-stepping procedures in ADOL-C, in Computational Science – ICCS 2006, V. N. Alexandrov, G. D. van Albada, P. M. A. Sloot, and J. Dongarra, eds., Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 3994, Springer, New York, 2006, pp. 541–549. [20] A. Logg, K.-A. Mardal, and G. Wells, eds., Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. 84, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. [21] C. Lozano, Discrete surprises in the computation of sensitivities from boundary integrals in the continuous adjoint approach to inviscid aerodynamic shape optimization, Comput. & Fluids, 56 (2012), pp. 118–127. · Zbl 1365.76100 [22] B. Mohammadi and O. Pironneau, Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids, Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2001. · Zbl 0970.76003 [23] O. Pironneau, On optimum profiles in Stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech., 59 (1973), pp. 117–128. · Zbl 0274.76022 [24] O. Pironneau, On optimum design in fluid mechanics, J. Fluid Mech., 64 (1974), pp. 97–110. · Zbl 0281.76020 [25] F. Rathgeber, D. A. Ham, L. Mitchell, M. Lange, F. Luporini, A. T. T. McRae, G. Bercea, G. R. Markall, and P. H. J. Kelly, Firedrake: Automating the Finite Element Method by Composing Abstractions, preprint, , 2015. · Zbl 1396.65144 [26] S. Schmidt, Efficient Large Scale Aerodynamic Design Based on Shape Calculus, Ph.D. thesis, University of Trier, Germany, 2010. [27] S. Schmidt, C. Ilic, V. Schulz, and N. Gauger, Three dimensional large scale aerodynamic shape optimization based on shape calculus, AIAA J., 51 (2013), pp. 2615–2627. [28] S. Schmidt and V. Schulz, Impulse response approximations of discrete shape Hessians with application in CFD, SIAM J. Control Optim., 48 (2009), pp. 2562–2580, . · Zbl 1387.49064 [29] S. Schmidt and V. Schulz, Shape derivatives for general objective functions and the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, Control Cybernet., 39 (2010), pp. 677–713. · Zbl 1282.49033 [30] S. Schmidt, E. Wadbro, and M. Berggren, Large-scale three-dimensional acoustic horn optimization, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 38 (2016), pp. B917–B940, . · Zbl 06646630 [31] V. Schulz and M. Siebenborn, Computational comparison of surface metrics for PDE constrained shape optimization, Comput. Methods Appl. Math., 16 (2016), pp. 485–497. · Zbl 1342.49065 [32] V. H. Schulz, A Riemannian view on shape optimization, Found. Comput. Math., 14 (2014), pp. 483–501. · Zbl 1296.49037 [33] J. Sokolowski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to Shape Optimization: Shape Sensitivity Analysis, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992. [34] M. Sonntag, S. Schmidt, and N. Gauger, Shape derivatives for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations in variational form, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 296 (2016), pp. 334–351. · Zbl 1329.49093 [35] A. Walther and A. Griewank, Advantages of binomial checkpointing for memory-reduced adjoint calculations, in Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications – Proceedings of ENUMATH 2003, M. Feistauer, V. Dolejš\' \i, P. Knobloch, and K. Najzar, eds., Springer, New York, 2004, pp. 834–843, · Zbl 1056.65064
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.