Pricing strategy versus heterogeneous shopping behavior under market price dispersion. (English) Zbl 1470.91114

Álvarez, Francisco; Rey, José-Manuel; Sanchis, Raúl G.

Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2016, Article ID 3254240, 8 p. (2016).

Summary: We consider the ubiquitous problem of a seller competing in a market of a product with dispersed prices and having limited information about both his competitors’ prices and the shopping behavior of his potential customers. Given the distribution of market prices, the distribution of consumers’ shopping behavior, and the seller’s cost as inputs, we find the computational solution for the pricing strategy that maximizes his expected profits. We analyze the seller’s solution with respect to different exogenous perturbations of parametric and functional inputs. For that purpose, we produce synthetic price data using the family of Generalized Error Distributions that includes normal and quasiuniform distributions as particular cases, and we also generate consumers’ shopping data from different behavioral assumptions. Our analysis shows that, beyond price mean and dispersion, the shape of the price distribution plays a significant role in the seller’s pricing solution. We focus on the seller’s response to an increasing diversity in consumers’ shopping behavior. We show that increasing heterogeneity in the shopping distribution typically lowers seller’s prices and expected profits.

MSC:

91B24

Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets)

Software:

R

References:

[1]	Bertrand, J., Review of Cournot, Journal des Savants, 67, 499-508, (1838)
[2]	Baye, M. R.; Morgan, J.; Scholten, P., Information, search, and price dispersion, Handbook on Economics and Information Systems, 1, (2006)
[3]	Kaplan, G.; Menzio, G., The morphology of price dispersion, International Economic Review, 56, 4, 1165-1206, (2015) · Zbl 1404.91108 · doi:10.1111/iere.12134
[4]	Stigler, G. J., The Economics of Information, Journal of Political Economy, 69, 3, 213-225, (1961) · doi:10.1086/258464
[5]	Burdett, K.; Judd, K. L., Equilibrium price dispersion, Econometrica, 51, 4, 955-969, (1983) · Zbl 0521.90022 · doi:10.2307/1912045
[6]	Alvarez, F.; Rey, J.-M.; Sanchis, R. G., Choice overload, satisficing behavior, and price distribution in a time allocation model, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, (2014) · Zbl 1406.91235 · doi:10.1155/2014/569054
[7]	Scheibehenne, B.; Greifeneder, R.; Todd, P. M., Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload, Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 3, 409-425, (2010) · doi:10.1086/651235
[8]	Sanchis, R. G.; Rey, J.-M.; Álvarez, F., Numerical analysis of a time allocation model accounting for choice overload, International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 91, 2, 315-326, (2014) · Zbl 1291.65195 · doi:10.1080/00207160.2013.799667
[9]	Schwartz, B., Self-determination: the tyranny of freedom, American Psychologist, 55, 1, 79-88, (2000) · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.79
[10]	Iyengar, S. S.; Lepper, M. R., When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 6, 995-1006, (2000) · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
[11]	Schwartz, B.; Ward, A.; Monterosso, J.; Lyubomirsky, S.; White, K.; Lehman, D. R., Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 5, 1178-1197, (2002) · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1178
[12]	R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, (2014), Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
[13]	Forbes, C.; Evans, M.; Hastings, N.; Peacock, B., Statistical Distributions, (2011), New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA · Zbl 1258.62012
[14]	Gray, R. M., Entropy and Information Theory, (1990), New York, NY, USA: Springer, New York, NY, USA · Zbl 0722.94001 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3982-4