Black-Litterman model for continuous distributions.

*(English)*Zbl 1403.91322Summary: The Black-Litterman methodology of portfolio optimization, developed at the turn of the 1990s, combines statistical information on asset returns with investor’s views within the Markowitz mean-variance framework. The main assumption underlying the Black-Litterman model is that asset returns and investor’s views are multivariate normally distributed. However, empirical research demonstrates that the distribution of asset returns has fat tails and is asymmetric, which contradicts normality. Recent advances in risk measurement advocate replacing the variance by risk measures that take account of tail behavior of the portfolio return distribution. This paper extends the Black-Litterman model into general continuous distributions and deviation measures of risk. Using ideas from the Black-Litterman methodology, we design numerical methods (with variance reduction techniques) for the inverse portfolio optimization that extracts statistical information from historical data in a stable way. We introduce a quantitative model for stating investor’s views and blending them consistently with the market information. The theory is complemented by efficient numerical methods with the implementation distributed in the form of publicly available R packages. We conduct practical tests, which demonstrate significant impact of the choice of distributions on optimal portfolio weights to the extent that the classical Black-Litterman procedure cannot be viewed as an adequate approximation.

##### MSC:

91G10 | Portfolio theory |

62P05 | Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics |

91G70 | Statistical methods; risk measures |

##### Keywords:

investment analysis; Black-Litterman model; asset allocation; deviation measures; numerical methods
PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{A. Palczewski} and \textit{J. Palczewski}, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273, No. 2, 708--720 (2019; Zbl 1403.91322)

Full Text:
DOI

##### References:

[1] | Adcock, C. J., Asset pricing and portfolio selection based on the multivariate extended skew-student-t distribution, Annals of Operations Research, 176, 221-234, (2010) · Zbl 1233.91112 |

[2] | Adcock, C. J.; Eling, M.; Loperfido, N., Skewed distributions in finance and actuarial science: a review, The European Journal of Finance, 21, 13-14, 1253-1281, (2015) |

[3] | Ane, T.; Geman, H., Order flow, transaction clock, and normality of asset returns, Journal of Finance, 55, 2259-2284, (2000) |

[4] | Asness, C. S.; Moskowitz, T. J.; Pedersen, L. H., Value and momentum everywhere, Journal of Finance, 68, 3, 929-985, (2013) |

[5] | Azzalini, A.; Capitanio, A., Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t distribution, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 65, 367-389, (2003) · Zbl 1065.62094 |

[6] | Behr, A.; PĂ¶tter, U., Alternatives to the normal model of stock returns: Gaussian mixture, generalised logf and generalised hyperbolic models, Annals of Finance, 5, 49-68, (2009) |

[7] | Black, F.; Litterman, R., Asset allocation: combining investor views with market equilibrium, Technical Report, (1990), Goldman Sachs, Fixed Income Research |

[8] | Black, F.; Litterman, R., Global portfolio optimization, Financial Analysts Journal, 48, 28-43, (1992) |

[9] | Cheung, W. (2009). Generalised factor view blending: Augmented Black-Litterman in non-normal financial markets with non-linear instruments. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1395283. |

[10] | Cheung, W., The augmented black-litterman model: a ranking-free approach to factor-based portfolio construction and beyond, Quantitative Finance, 13, 1469-7688, (2013) |

[11] | DeMiguel, V.; Garlappi, L.; Uppal, R., Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy?, Review of Financial Studies, 22, 1915-1953, (2009) |

[12] | Fabozzi, F. J.; Focardi, S. M.; Kolm, P. N., Incorporating trading strategies in the black-litterman framework, The Journal of Trading, 1, 28-37, (2006) |

[13] | Fama, E. F., The behavior of stock-market prices, The Journal of Business, 38, 1, 34-105, (1965) |

[14] | Giacometti, R.; Bertocchi, M.; Rachev, S. T.; Fabozzi, F. J., Stable distributions in the black-litterman approach to asset allocation, Quantitative Finance, 7, 4, 423-433, (2007) · Zbl 1190.91136 |

[15] | Giacometti, R.; Mignacca, D., Using the black and litterman framework for stress test analysis in asset management, Journal of Asset Management, 11, 4, 286-297, (2010) |

[16] | Glasserman, P., Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering, (2003), Springer Science & Business Media |

[17] | Glasserman, P.; Heidelberger, P.; Shahabuddin, P., Portfolio value-at-risk with heavy-tailed risk factors, Mathematical Finance, 12, 3, 239-269, (2002) · Zbl 1147.91325 |

[18] | Grinblatt, M.; Moskowitz, T. J., Predicting stock price movements from past returns: the role of consistency and tax-loss selling, Journal of Financial Economics, 71, 541-579, (2004) · Zbl 1131.91338 |

[19] | Harris, R. D.; Stoja, E.; Tan, L., The dynamic black-litterman approach to asset allocation, European Journal of Operational Research, 259, 3, 1085-1096, (2017) · Zbl 1402.91701 |

[20] | He, G., & Litterman, R. (2002). The intuition behind Black-Litterman model portfolios. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.334304. |

[21] | Kolm, P.; Ritter, G., On the Bayesian interpretation of black-litterman, European Journal of Operational Research, 258, 564-572, (2017) · Zbl 1395.91412 |

[22] | Krokhmal, P.; Palmquist, J.; Uryasev, S., Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints, Journal of Risk, 4, 43-68, (2002) |

[23] | Lee, S. X.; McLachlan, G. J., Emmixuskew: an R package for Fitting mixtures of multivariate skew t distributions via the EM algorithm, Journal of Statistical Software, 55, 12, 1-22, (2013) |

[24] | Litterman, R.; Quantitative Resources Group, Modern investment management: an equilibrium approach, (2004), John Wiley & Sons |

[25] | Mandelbrot, B., The variation in certain speculative prices, Journal of Business, 36, 394-419, (1963) |

[26] | Martellini, L.; Ziemann, V., Extending black-litterman analysis beyond the mean-variance framework, Journal of Portfolio Management, 33, 4, 33-44, (2007) |

[27] | Meucci, A., Risk and asset allocation, (2005), Springer New York · Zbl 1102.91067 |

[28] | Meucci, A., Beyond black-litterman: views on non-normal markets, Risk, 19, 87-92, (2006) |

[29] | Meucci, A. (2008a). The Black-Litterman approach: Original model and extensions. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1117574. |

[30] | Meucci, A., Fully flexible views: theory and practice, Risk, 21, 97-102, (2008) |

[31] | Meucci, A., Enhancing the black-litterman and related approaches: views and stress-test on risk factors, Journal of Asset Management, 10, 2, 89-96, (2009) |

[32] | Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2015). 2016 emerging market fixed income outlook. https://www.morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/investment-insights/ii_emoutlook_us.pdf. |

[33] | Nystedt, J.; Pando, M.; Rosselli, A.; Emery, T., Emerging markets fixed income update, (2016), Morgan Stanley |

[34] | Palczewski, A. (2017). PortfolioOptim: Small/large sample portfolio optimization. https://cran.r-project.org/package=PortfolioOptim. |

[35] | Palczewski, A., LP algorithms for portfolio optimization: the portfoliooptim package, The R Journal, 10, 1, 308-327, (2018) |

[36] | Palczewski, A., & Palczewski, J. (2017a). BLmodel: Black-Litterman posterior distribution. https://cran.r-project.org/package=BLModel. |

[37] | Palczewski, A., & Palczewski, J. (2017b). Elliptical Black-Litterman portfolio optimization. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2941483. · Zbl 1304.91206 |

[38] | Roberts, G. O.; Rosenthal, J. S., Optimal scaling of discrete approximations to Langevin diffusions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 60, 1, 255-268, (1998) · Zbl 0913.60060 |

[39] | Rockafellar, R. T.; Uryasev, S., Optimization of conditional value-at-risk, Journal of Risk, 2, 21-42, (2000) |

[40] | Rockafellar, R. T.; Uryasev, S., Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions, Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 7, 1443-1471, (2002) |

[41] | Rockafellar, R. T.; Uryasev, S.; Zabarankin, M., Generalized deviations in risk analysis, Finance and Stochastics, 10, 1, 51-74, (2006) · Zbl 1150.90006 |

[42] | Rockafellar, R. T.; Uryasev, S.; Zabarankin, M., Master funds in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures, Journal of Banking & Finance, 30, 2, 743-778, (2006) |

[43] | Rockafellar, R. T.; Uryasev, S.; Zabarankin, M., Optimality conditions in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures, Mathematical Programming, Series B, 108, 515-540, (2006) · Zbl 1138.91474 |

[44] | Rockafellar, R. T.; Uryasev, S.; Zabarankin, M., Equilibrium with investors using a diversity of deviation measures, Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 11, 3251-3268, (2007) |

[45] | Stoyanov, S. V.; Samorodnitsky, G.; Rachev, S.; Ortobelli Lozza, S., Computing the portfolio conditional value-at-risk in the alpha-stable case, Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 26, 1, 1-22, (2006) · Zbl 1255.91395 |

[46] | Sun, L.; Hong, L. J., Asymptotic representations for importance-sampling estimators of value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk, Operations Research Letters, 38, 4, 246-251, (2010) · Zbl 1193.91165 |

[47] | Wang, K., Ng, A., & McLachlan., G. (2017). EMMIXskew: The EM algorithm and skew mixture distribution. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=EMMIXskew. |

[48] | Xiao, Y.; Valdez, E. A., A black-litterman asset allocation model under elliptical distributions, Quantitative Finance, 15, 3, 509-519, (2015) · Zbl 1398.62330 |

[49] | Zhu, D.; Galbraith, J. W., A generalized asymmetric student-t distribution with application to financial econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 157, 297-305, (2010) · Zbl 1431.62222 |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.