Inherent complexity research on the bullwhip effect in supply chains with two retailers: the impact of three forecasting methods considering market share. (English) Zbl 1470.90004

Summary: An important phenomenon in supply chain management which is known as the bullwhip effect suggests that demand variability increases as one moves up a supply chain. This paper contrasts the bullwhip effect for a two-stage supply chain consisting of one supplier and two retailers under three forecasting methods based on the market share. We can quantify the correlation coefficient between the two retailers clearly, in consideration of market share. The two retailers both employ the order-up-to inventory policy for replenishments. The bullwhip effect is measured, respectively, under the minimum mean squared error (MMSE), moving average (MA), and exponential smoothing (ES) forecasting methods. The effect of autoregressive coefficient, lead time, and the market share on a bullwhip effect measure is investigated by using algebraic analysis and numerical simulation. And the comparison of the bullwhip effect under three forecasting methods is conducted. The conclusion suggests that different forecasting methods and various parameters lead to different bullwhip effects. Hence, the corresponding forecasting method should be chosen by the managers under different parameters in practice.


90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
91B42 Consumer behavior, demand theory


Full Text: DOI


[1] Forrester, J. W., Industrial dynamicsa major breakthrough for decision making, Harvard Business Review, 36, 4, 37-66 (1958)
[2] Forrester, J. W., Industrial Dynamics (1961), Cambridge, Mass, USA: MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA
[3] Blinder, A. S., Inventories and sticky prices, American Economic Review, 72, 334-349 (1982)
[4] Blanchard, O. J., The production and inventory behavior of American automobile industry, Journal of Political Economy, 91, 365-400 (1983)
[5] Burbidge, J. L., Automated production control with a simulation capability, IFIP Working Paper, WG 5(7) (1984), Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Blinder, A. S., Can the production smoothing model of inventory behavior be safe?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 431-454 (1986)
[7] Kahn, J., Inventories and the volatility of production, American Economics Review, 77, 667-679 (1987)
[8] Sterman, J., Optimal policy for a multi-product, dynamic, nonstationary inventory problem, Management Science, 12, 206-222 (1989)
[9] Lee, H. L.; Padmanabhan, V.; Whang, S., Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect, Management Science, 43, 4, 546-558 (1997) · Zbl 0888.90047
[10] Lee, H. L.; Padmanabhan, P.; Whang, S., Bullwhip effect in a supply chain, Sloan Management Review, 38, 93-102 (1997)
[11] Metters, R., Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains, Journal of Operations Management, 15, 2, 89-100 (1997)
[12] Graves, S. C., A single-item inventory model for a non-stationary demand process, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 1, 50-61 (1999)
[13] Chen, F.; Drezner, Z.; Ryan, J. K.; Simchi-Levi, D., Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: the impact of forecasting, lead times, and information, Management Science, 46, 3, 436-443 (2000) · Zbl 1231.90019
[14] Chen, F.; Ryan, J. K.; Simchi-Levi, D., The impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect, Naval Research Logistics, 47, 4, 269-286 (2000) · Zbl 0968.90006
[15] Xu, K.; Dong, Y.; Evers, P. T., Towards better coordination of the supply chain, Transportation Research E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 37, 1, 35-54 (2000)
[16] Zhang, X., The impact of forecasting methods on the bullwhip effect, International Journal of Production Economics, 88, 1, 15-27 (2004)
[17] Luong, H. T., Measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with autoregressive demand process, European Journal of Operational Research, 180, 3, 1086-1097 (2007) · Zbl 1121.90362
[18] Duc, T. T. H.; Luong, H. T.; Kim, Y. D., Effect of the third-party warehouse on bullwhip effect and inventory cost in supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, 124, 2, 395-407 (2010)
[19] Karimi, H. R.; Duffie, N. A.; Dashkovskiy, S., Local capacity \(H_\infty\) control for production networks of autonomous work systems with time-varying delays, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 7, 4, 849-857 (2010)
[20] Nepal, B.; Murat, A.; Babu Chinnam, R., The bullwhip effect in capacitated supply chains with consideration for product life-cycle aspects, International Journal of Production Economics, 136, 2, 318-331 (2012)
[21] Dashkovskiy, S.; Karimi, H. R.; Kosmykov, M., A Lyapunov-Razumikhin approach for stability analysis of logistics networks with time-delays, International Journal of Systems Science, 43, 5, 845-853 (2012) · Zbl 1307.93303
[22] Dashkovskiy, S.; Karimi, H. R.; Kosmykov, M., Stability analysis of logistics networks with time-delays, Production Planning and Control, 24, 7, 567-574 (2013)
[23] Mehrsai, A.; Karimi, H.; Thoben, K.; Scholz-Reiter, B., Application of learning pallets for real-time scheduling by the use of radial basis function network, Neurocomputing, 101, 82-93 (2013)
[24] Mehrsai, A.; Karimi, H.; Scholz-Reiter, B., Toward learning autonomous pallets by using fuzzy rules, applied in a Conwip system, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 64, 5-8, 1131-1150 (2013)
[25] Ma, J. H.; Ma, X. G., A comparison of bullwhip effect under various forecasting techniques in supply chains with two retailers, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013 (2013) · Zbl 1470.90005
[26] Shen, W.; Jiang, J. H., Parameter matching analysis of hydraulic hybrid excavators based on dynamic programming algorithm, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013 (2013)
[27] Shen, W.; Jianga, J.; Sub, X.; Karimic, H. R., Control strategy analysis of the hydraulic hybrid excavator, Journal of the Franklin Institute (2014) · Zbl 1307.93058
[28] Duc, T. T. H.; Luong, H. T.; Kim, Y., A measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with a mixed autoregressive-moving average demand process, The European Journal of Operational Research, 187, 1, 243-256 (2008) · Zbl 1146.90311
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.