×

Moment conditions selection based on adaptive penalized empirical likelihood. (English) Zbl 1472.62175

Summary: Empirical likelihood is a very popular method and has been widely used in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and data mining as tablets and mobile application and social media dominate the technology landscape. This paper proposes an empirical likelihood shrinkage method to efficiently estimate unknown parameters and select correct moment conditions simultaneously, when the model is defined by moment restrictions in which some are possibly misspecified. We show that our method enjoys oracle-like properties; that is, it consistently selects the correct moment conditions and at the same time its estimator is as efficient as the empirical likelihood estimator obtained by all correct moment conditions. Moreover, unlike the GMM, our proposed method allows us to carry out confidence regions for the parameters included in the model without estimating the covariances of the estimators. For empirical implementation, we provide some data-driven procedures for selecting the tuning parameter of the penalty function. The simulation results show that the method works remarkably well in terms of correct moment selection and the finite sample properties of the estimators. Also, a real-life example is carried out to illustrate the new methodology.

MSC:

62R07 Statistical aspects of big data and data science
68T01 General topics in artificial intelligence
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Xie, F.; Fan, S.; Wang, J.; Lu, H.; Li, C., Special issue on “Artificial intelligence and data mining”, Abstract and Applied Analysis (2014)
[2] Hansen, L. P., Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators, Econometrica, 50, 4, 1029-1054 (1982) · Zbl 0502.62098 · doi:10.2307/1912775
[3] Godambe, V. P.; Heyde, C. C., Quasi-likelihood and optimal estimation, International Statistical Review, 55, 3, 231-244 (1987) · Zbl 0671.62007 · doi:10.2307/1403403
[4] Newey, W. K.; Smith, R. J., Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators, Econometrica, 72, 1, 219-255 (2004) · Zbl 1151.62313 · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00482.x
[5] Schennach, S. M., Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood, Biometrika, 92, 1, 31-46 (2005) · Zbl 1068.62035 · doi:10.1093/biomet/92.1.31
[6] Liao, Z., Adaptive GMM shrinkage estimation with consistent moment selection, Econometric Theory, 29, 5, 857-904 (2013) · Zbl 1290.62052 · doi:10.1017/S0266466612000783
[7] Qin, J.; Lawless, J., Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations, The Annals of Statistics, 22, 1, 300-325 (1994) · Zbl 0799.62049 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176325370
[8] Fan, J.; Li, R., Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 456, 1348-1360 (2001) · Zbl 1073.62547 · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273
[9] Hong, H.; Preston, B.; Shum, M., Generalized empirical likelihood-based model selection criteria for moment condition models, Econometric Theory, 19, 6, 923-943 (2003) · Zbl 1441.62735 · doi:10.1017/S0266466603196028
[10] MaCurdy, T., An empirical model of labor supply in a life-cycle setting, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 6, 1059-1085 (1981)
[11] Altonji, J., Intertemporal substitution in labor supply: evidence from micro data, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 3, 176-215 (1986)
[12] Owen, A. B., Empirical Likelihood (2001), New York, NY, USA: Chapman and Hall-CCRC, New York, NY, USA · Zbl 0989.62019
[13] Hjort, N. L.; McKeague, I. W.; van Keilegom, I., Extending the scope of empirical likelihood, The Annals of Statistics, 37, 3, 1079-1111 (2009) · Zbl 1160.62029 · doi:10.1214/07-AOS555
[14] Pakes, A.; Pollard, D., Simulation and the asymptotics of optimization estimators, Econometrica, 57, 5, 1027-1057 (1989) · Zbl 0698.62031 · doi:10.2307/1913622
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.