×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geostatistical interpolation of non-stationary seismic data. (English) Zbl 1421.86030
Summary: The problem of sparsely collected seismic data is one of the main issues in reflection seismology, because most advanced data processing techniques require a dense and regular seismic data grid. We present a geostatistical seismic data interpolation technique based on sequential stochastic simulations with local structural anisotropies. This technique, contrary to conventional existing data-driven seismic interpolation approaches based on sparsity, prediction filters, or rank-reduction, predicts the value of seismic amplitudes at non-sampled locations by exploiting the statistics of the recorded amplitudes, which are used as experimental data for the geostatistical interpolation in the original data domain. Local mean and variance are computed on-the-fly to define intervals of the global conditional distribution function, from where amplitude values are stochastically simulated. The parameters to define subsets of experimental data from which mean and variance are calculated are given by local variogram models, which in turn are obtained from a local dip and azimuth estimation in the \(t\)-\(x\)-\(y\) domain. The geostatistical seismic data interpolation technique is applied to synthetic and real 2D and 3D datasets in both post- and pre-stack domains. Besides being computationally cheaper than other methods, because the interpolation is carried out directly in the original data domain, the proposed technique provides a local quantitative analysis of the reliability of the interpolated seismic samples, which can be exploited in following processing steps.

MSC:
86A32 Geostatistics
62H11 Directional data; spatial statistics
86A15 Seismology (including tsunami modeling), earthquakes
Software:
GSLIB
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Aravkin, AY; Kumar, R.; Mansour, B.; Recht, B.; Herrmann, FJ, Fast methods for denoising matrix completion formulations, with application to robust seismic data interpolation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36, s237-s266, (2014) · Zbl 1307.65051
[2] Azevedo, L., Soares, A.: Geostatistical methods for reservoir geophysics. Advances in oil and gas exploration & production. Springer International Publishing (2017)
[3] Bahorich, M.; Farmer, S., 3-D seismic coherency for faults and stratigraphic features: The coherence cube, The Leading Edge, 14, 1053-1058, (1995)
[4] Biondi, B.; Palacharla, G., 3-D prestack migration of common-azimuth data, Geophysics, 61, 1822-1832, (1996)
[5] Caeiro, M.H., Demyanov, V., Soares, A.: Optimized history matching with direct sequential image transforming for non-stationary reservoirs. Math. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-015-9591-0 (2015)
[6] Claerbout, J.F.: Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing Versus Inversion. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge (1992)
[7] Dalley, RM; Gevers, EEA; Stampli, GM; Davies, DJ; Gastaldi, CN; Ruijtenberg, PR; Vermeer, GJD, Dip and azimuth displays for 3D seismic interpretation, First Break, 7, 86-95, (1989)
[8] Darche, G: Spatial interpolation using a fast parabolic transform. In: 60th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 1647-1750 (1990)
[9] Deutsch, C., Journel, A.G.: GSLIB. Geostatistical Software Library and Users’ Guide. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)
[10] Doyen, P.M.: Seismic Reservoir Characterization. EAGE, Madrid (2007)
[11] Dubrule, O.: Geostatistics for Seismic Data Integration in Earth Models. SEG/EAGE Distinguished Instructor Short Course Number 6, Tulsa (2003)
[12] Fomel, S., Applications of plane-wave destruction filters, Geophysics, 67, 1946-1960, (2002)
[13] Fomel, S., Seismic reflection data interpolation with differential offset and shot continuation, Geophysics, 68, 733-744, (2003)
[14] Gardner, G.H.F., Canning, A.: Effects of irregular sampling on 3-D prestack migration. In: 64th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp 1553-1556 (1994)
[15] Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)
[16] Guo, J., Zhou, X., Yang, H.J.: Efficient f-k domain seismic trace interpolation for spatially aliased data. In: 66th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp 1457-1460 (1996)
[17] Gülünay, N., Seismic trace interpolation in the Fourier transform domain, Geophysics, 68, 355-369, (2003)
[18] Gülünay, N., Chambers, R.E.: Unaliased f-k domain trace interpolation (UFKI). In: 66th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp 1461-1464 (1996)
[19] Hennenfent, G.; Herrmann, FJ, Simply denoise: wavefield reconstruction via jittered undersampling, Geophysics, 73, v19-v28, (2008)
[20] Herrmann, FJ; Hennenfent, G., Non-parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames, Geophys. J. Int., 173, 233-248, (2008)
[21] Horta, A, Caeiro, M., Nunes, R., Soares, A.A.: Simulation of continuous variables at meander structures: application to contaminated sediments of a lagoon. In: Atkinson P, Lloyd C (eds.) geoENV VII—Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, pp 161-172. Springer, The Netherlands (2009)
[22] Jia, Y.; Ma, J., What can machine learning do for seismic data processing: an interpolation application?, Geophysics, 82, v163-v177, (2017)
[23] Kreimer, N.; Stanton, A.; Sacchi, MD, Tensor completion based on nuclear norm minimization for 5D seismic data reconstruction, Geophysics, 78, 273-v284, (2013)
[24] Kumar, R, Mansour, H., Herrmann, F.J., Aravkin, A.Y.: Reconstruction of seismic wavefields via low-rank matrix factorization in the hierarchical-separable matrix representation. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp 3628-3633 (2013)
[25] Kumar, R.; Da Silva, C.; Akalin, O.; Aravkin, AY; Mansour, H.; Recht, B.; Herrmann, FJ, Efficient matrix completion for seismic data reconstruction, Geophysics, 80, v97-v113, (2015)
[26] Liang, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X., Seismic data restoration via data-driven tight frame, Geophysics, 79, v65-v74, (2014)
[27] Liu, B.; Sacchi, MD, Minimum weighted norm interpolation of seismic records, Geophysics, 69, 1560-1568, (2004)
[28] Liu, Y.; Fomel, S., Seismic data interpolation beyond aliasing using regularized nonstationary autoregression, Geophysics, 76, v69-v77, (2011)
[29] Luis J.J., Almeida J.: Stochastic characterization of fluvial sand channels. In: E. Baafi, et al. (eds.) Geostatistics Wollogong 96, pp 465-477, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1997)
[30] Ma, J., Three-dimensional irregular seismic data reconstruction via low-rank matrix completion, Geophysics, 78, v181-v192, (2013)
[31] Marfurt, K.J.: Robust estimates of 3D reflector dip and azimuth. Geophysics, 71(4). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2213049 (2006)
[32] Naghizadeh, M.; Sacchi, MD, f-x adaptive seismic trace interpolation, Geophysics, 74, v9-v16, (2009)
[33] Naghizadeh, M.; Sacchi, MD, Beyond alias hierarchical scale curvelet interpolation of regularly and irregularly sampled seismic data, Geophysics, 75, wb189-wb202, (2010)
[34] Naghizadeh, M, Sacchi, M.D.: Hierarchical scale curvelet interpolation of aliased seismic data. In: 80th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp 3656-3661 (2010)
[35] Naghizadeh, M.; Innanen, KA, Seismic data interpolation using a fast generalized Fourier transform, Geophysics, 76, v1-v10, (2011)
[36] Nguyen, T., Winnett, R.: Seismic interpolation by optimally matched Fourier components. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp. 3085-3089 (2011)
[37] Oporeza, V.; Sacchi, MD, Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via multichannel singular spectrum analysis, Geophysics, 76, v25-v32, (2011)
[38] Porsani, MJ, Seismic trace interpolation using half-step prediction filters, Geophysics, 64, 1461-1467, (1999)
[39] Ronen, J., Wave-equation trace interpolation, Geophysics, 52, 973-984, (1987)
[40] Sacchi, MD; Ulrych, TJ, Estimation of the discrete Fourier Transform, a linear inversion approach, Geophysics, 61, 1128-1136, (1996)
[41] Sacchi, MD; Ulrych, TJ; Walker, CJ, Interpolation and extrapolation using a high-resolution discrete Fourier transform, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 46, 31-38, (1998)
[42] Soares, A., Geostatistical estimation of orebody geometry: morphological kriging, Math. Geol., 22, 787-802, (1990) · Zbl 0964.86500
[43] Soares, A., Direct sequential simulation and co-simulation, Math. Geol., 33, 911-926, (2001) · Zbl 1010.86017
[44] Spitz, S., Seismic trace interpolation in the F-X domain, Geophysics, 56, 785-794, (1991)
[45] Stolt, RH, Seismic data mapping and reconstruction, Geophysics, 67, 890-908, (2002)
[46] Stroet, C., Judith, J.: Mapping curvilinear structures with local anisotropy kriging. Math. Geol. 37(6) (2005) · Zbl 1080.86511
[47] Trad, D.; Ulrych, TJ; Sacchi, MD, Accurate interpolation with high-resolution time-variant Radon transforms, Geophysics, 67, 644-656, (2002)
[48] Trad, D., Interpolation and multiple attenuation with migration operators, Geophysics, 68, 2043-2054, (2003)
[49] Trad, D., Five-dimensional interpolation: recovering from acquisition constraints, Geophysics, 74, v123-v132, (2009)
[50] Trickett, SR, F-xy Eigenimage noise suppression, Geophysics, 68, 751-759, (2003)
[51] Trickett, S., Burroughs, L., Milton, A., Walton, L., Dack, R.: Rank-reduction-based trace interpolation. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp 3829-3833 (2010)
[52] Turquais, P., Asgedom, E.G., Söllner, W.: Structured dictionary learning for interpolation of aliased seismic data. In: 87th Annual Meeting, SEG, pp 4257-4261 (2017)
[53] Van Dedem, E.J., Verschuur, D. J.: 3-D surface-related multiple elimination and interpolation. In: 68th Annual International Meeting, SEG, pp 1321-1324 (1998)
[54] Wang, Y., Seismic trace interpolation in the f-x-y domain, Geophysics, 67, 1232-1239, (2002)
[55] Wang, J., Ng, M, Perz, M.: Fast high resolution Radon transforms by greedy least-squares methods. In: SEG Expanded Abstracts, vol. 28, pp 3128-3132 (2009)
[56] Xu, W., Conditional curvilinear stochastic simulation using pixel-based algorithms, Math. Geol., 28, 937-949, (1996)
[57] Yang, S., Ma, J., Osher, S.: Seismic data reconstruction via matrix completion. In: UCLA CAM, pp 12-14 (2012) · Zbl 1292.15017
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.