##
**Ranking DMUs by calculating the interval efficiency with a common set of weights in DEA.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1442.90105

Summary: To evaluate the performance of decision making units (DMUs), data envelopment analysis (DEA) was introduced. Basically, the traditional DEA scheme calculates the best relative efficiency score (i.e., the “optimistic” efficiency) of each DMU with the most favorable weights. A decision maker may be unable to compare and fully rank the efficiencies of different DMUs that are calculated using these potentially distinct sets of weights on the same basis. Based on the literature, the assignable worst relative efficiency score (i.e., the “pessimistic” efficiency) for each DMU can also be determined. In this paper, the best and the worst relative efficiencies are considered simultaneously. To measure the overall performance of the DMUs, an integration of both the best and the worst relative efficiencies is considered in the form of an interval. The advantage of this efficiency interval is that it provides all of the possible efficiency values and an expanded overview to the decision maker. The proposed method determines the lower- and upper-bounds of the interval efficiency over a common set of weights. To demonstrate the implementation of the introduced method, a numerical example is provided.

### MSC:

90B50 | Management decision making, including multiple objectives |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{V. Rezaie} et al., J. Appl. Math. 2014, Article ID 346763, 9 p. (2014; Zbl 1442.90105)

Full Text:
DOI

### References:

[1] | Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 6, 429-444 (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080 |

[2] | Entani, T.; Maeda, Y.; Tanaka, H., Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data, European Journal of Operational Research, 136, 1, 32-45 (2002) · Zbl 1087.90513 |

[3] | Wang, Y.-M.; Luo, Y., DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173, 2, 902-915 (2006) · Zbl 1112.90355 |

[4] | Wang, Y.-M.; Yang, J.-B., Measuring the performances of decision-making units using interval efficiencies, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 198, 1, 253-267 (2007) · Zbl 1120.90347 |

[5] | Jahanshahloo, G. R.; Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.; Rezaie, V.; Khanmohammadi, M., Ranking DMUs by ideal points with interval data in DEA, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35, 1, 218-229 (2011) · Zbl 1202.90162 |

[6] | Azizi, H., The interval efficiency based on the optimistic and pessimistic points of view, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35, 5, 2384-2393 (2011) · Zbl 1217.90137 |

[7] | Sengupta, A.; Pal, T. K., On comparing interval numbers, European Journal of Operational Research, 127, 1, 28-43 (2000) · Zbl 0991.90080 |

[8] | Wang, Y.-M.; Luo, Y.; Lan, Y.-X., Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 8, 9122-9128 (2011) |

[9] | Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.; Jahanshahloo, G. R.; Khodabakhshi, M.; Rostamy-Malkhlifeh, M.; Moghaddas, Z.; Vaez-Ghasemi, M., A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013 (2013) · Zbl 1271.62031 |

[10] | Ganley, J. A.; Cubbin, S. A., Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis (1992), Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands |

[11] | Roll, Y.; Cook, W. D.; Golany, B., Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis, IIE Transactions, 23, 1, 2-9 (1991) |

[12] | Roll, Y.; Golany, B., Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA, Omega, 21, 1, 99-109 (1993) |

[13] | Sinuany-Stern, Z.; Friedman, L., DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units, European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 3, 470-478 (1998) · Zbl 0939.91112 |

[14] | Jahanshahloo, G. R.; Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.; Khanmohammadi, M.; Kazemimanesh, M.; Rezaie, V., Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 12, 7483-7488 (2010) |

[15] | Andersen, P.; Petersen, N. C., A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 39, 10, 1261-1264 (1993) · Zbl 0800.90096 |

[16] | Cook, W. D.; Kress, M.; Seiford, L. M., Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 59, 2, 319-323 (1992) · Zbl 0775.90004 |

[17] | Jahanshahloo, G. R.; Junior, H. V.; Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.; Akbarian, D., A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set, European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 1, 331-337 (2007) · Zbl 1121.90357 |

[18] | Amin, G. R.; Toloo, M., A polynomial-time algorithm for finding ϵ in DEA models, Computers & Operations Research, 31, 5, 803-805 (2004) · Zbl 1106.90335 |

[19] | Parkan, C.; Wang, Y., The worst possible relative efficiency analysis based on inefficient production frontier, Working Paper (2000), Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong |

[20] | Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W., Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9, 3-4, 181-186 (1962) · Zbl 0127.36901 |

[21] | Liu, F.-H. F.; Peng, H. H., Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights, Computers & Operations Research, 35, 5, 1624-1637 (2008) · Zbl 1211.90101 |

[22] | Toloo, M.; Masoumzadeh, A.; Barat, M., Finding an initial basic feasible solution for DEA models with an application on bank industry, Computational Economics (2014) |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.