×

Benchmark problems for continuous-time model identification: design aspects, results and perspectives. (English) Zbl 1429.93067

Summary: The problem of estimating continuous-time model parameters of linear dynamical systems using sampled time-domain input and output data has received considerable attention over the past decades and has been approached by various methods. The research topic also bears practical importance due to both its close relation to first principles modelling and equally to linear model-based control design techniques, most of them carried in continuous time. Nonetheless, as the performance of the existing algorithms for continuous-time model identification has seldom been assessed and, as thus far, it has not been considered in a comprehensive study, this practical potential of existing methods remains highly questionable. The goal of this brief paper is to bring forward a first study on this issue and to factually highlight the main aspects of interest. As such, an analysis is performed on a benchmark designed to be consistent both from a system identification viewpoint and from a control-theoretic one. It is concluded that robust initialization aspects require further research focus towards reliable algorithm development.

MSC:

93B30 System identification
93C35 Multivariable systems, multidimensional control systems
93C05 Linear systems in control theory
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI HAL

References:

[1] Alvarez, J. D.; Guzmán, J. L.; Rivera, D. E.; Berenguel, M.; Dormido, S., Perspectives on control-relevant identification through the use of interactive tools, Control Engineering Practice, 21, 2, 171-183 (2013)
[2] Chen, T.; Ohlsson, H.; Ljung, L., On the estimation of transfer functions, regularizations and Gaussian processes - revisited, Automatica, 48, 8, 1525-1535 (2012) · Zbl 1269.93126
[3] Dobrowiecki, T.; Schoukens, J.; Guillaume, P., Optimized excitation signals for MIMO frequency response function measurements, (IMTC 2005 - instrumentation and measurement technology conference (2005))
[4] Garnier, H.; Gilson, M., CONTSID: a MATLAB toolbox for standard and advanced system identification, (18th IFAC symposium on system identification (2018))
[5] Garnier, H.; Gilson, M.; Young, P. C.; Huselstein, E., An optimal IV technique for identifying continuous-time transfer function model of multiple-input systems, Control Engineering Practice, 15, 4, 471-486 (2007)
[6] Garnier, H.; Young, P. C., The advantages of directly identifying continuous-time transfer function models in practical applications, International Journal of Control, 87, 7, 1319-1338 (2014) · Zbl 1317.93258
[7] Gevers, M.; Bazanella, A. S.; Bombois, X.; Mišković, L., Identification and the information matrix: how to get just sufficiently rich?, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54, 12, 2828-2840 (2009) · Zbl 1367.93671
[8] Gevers, M.; Mišković, L.; Bonvin, D.; Karimi, A., Identification of multi-input systems: variance analysis and input design issues, Automatica, 42, 4, 559-572 (2006) · Zbl 1102.93011
[9] Glover, K., All optimal Hankel-norm approximations of linear multivariable systems and their L∞-error bounds, International Journal of Control, 39, 6, 1115-1193 (1984) · Zbl 0543.93036
[10] Hjalmarsson, H.; Rojas, C. R.; Rivera, D. E., System identification: A Wiener-Hammerstein benchmark, Control Engineering Practice, 20, 11, 1095-1096 (2012)
[11] Kroll, A.; Schulte, H., Benchmark problems for nonlinear system identification and control using soft computing methods: need and overview, Applied Soft Computing, 25, 12, 496-513 (2014)
[12] Ljung, L., System identification - theory for the user (1999), Prentice-Hall: Prentice-Hall New Jersey, U.S.A.
[13] Ljung, L., Initialization aspects for subspace and output-error identification methods, (European control conference (2003), Cambridge, United Kingdom)
[14] Ljung, L., System identification toolbox: User’s guide (2018), The MathWorks Inc.: The MathWorks Inc. Natick, Massachussetts
[15] Ljung, L.; Singh, R., Version 8 of the MATLAB system identification toolbox, (16th IFAC symposium on system identification (2012))
[16] Ljung, L.; Wills, A., Issues in sampling and estimating continuous-time models with stochastic disturbances, (IFAC world congress (2008))
[17] Mehra, R.; Tyler, J. S., Case studies in aircraft parameter identification, (3rd IFAC symposium on system identification (1973))
[18] Opmeer, M., Decay of Hankel singular values of analytic control systems, Systems & Control Letters, 59, 10, 635-638 (2010) · Zbl 1205.93075
[19] Pascu, V.; Garnier, H.; Ljung, L.; Janot, A., Developments towards formalizing a benchmark for continuous-time model identification, (55th IEEE conference on decision and control (2016))
[20] Pintelon, R.; Schoukens, J., System identification - A frequency domain approach (2012), IEEE Press: IEEE Press New Jersey, U.S.A. · Zbl 0970.93514
[21] Rojas, C. R.; Valenzuela, P. E.; Rojas, R. A., A critical view on benchmarks based on randomly generated systems, (17th IFAC symposium on system identification (2015))
[22] Rolain, Y.; Pintelon, R., Generating robust starting values for frequency-domain transfer function model estimation, Automatica, 35, 5, 965-972 (1999) · Zbl 0945.93525
[23] Schoukens, J.; Suykens, J.; Ljung, L., Wiener-Hammerstein benchmark, (15th IFAC symposium on system identification (2016)), As reported on: https://tc.ifac-control.org/1/1/Data
[24] Skogestad, S.; Postlethwaite, I., Multivariable feedback control: Analysis and design (2005), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons Chicester, United Kingdom · Zbl 0842.93024
[25] Smith, R. S.; Dullerud, G. E., Continuous-time control model validation using finite experimental data, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41, 8, 1094-1105 (1996) · Zbl 0855.93011
[26] Söderström, T.; Stoica, P., (Instrumental variable methods for system identification. Instrumental variable methods for system identification, Lecture notes in control and information sciences (1983), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany) · Zbl 0522.93003
[27] Young, P. C., Recursive estimation and time-series analysis. An introduction for the student and practitioner (2011), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany · Zbl 1266.62072
[28] Young, P. C.; Garnier, H.; Gilson, M., Refined instrumental variable identification of continuous-time hybrid Box-Jenkins models, (Garnier, H.; Wang, L., Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data (2008), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag London), 91-131
[29] Zhou, K.; Doyle, J. C.; Glover, K., Robust and optimal control (1996), Prentice-Hall: Prentice-Hall New Jersey, U.S.A. · Zbl 0999.49500
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.