zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Hierarchical Bayesian mixture models of processing architectures and stopping rules. (English) Zbl 1437.91368
Summary: Systems factorial technology is a methodology that allows researchers to identify properties of cognitive processing systems, such as the system’s architecture and the decisional stopping rule. It assumes that the cognitive system will use the same architecture and decisional stopping rule on every trial of an experiment. Through simulation, we aim to explore the predictions of models that allow for a mixture of architectures and decisional stopping rules across trials. Our simulation reveals a pattern of interaction contrasts across different mixtures, some of which mimic each other. Given the mimicry, we developed a hierarchical Bayesian inference method that can identify mixture probabilities for mixtures of architectures and stopping rules. The method is also a useful inference tool that can determine what architecture and stopping rule a participant is using and has many promising future developments, such as simultaneous group and subject level inference.
91E10 Cognitive psychology
62F15 Bayesian inference
powder; jpnb4
Full Text: DOI
[1] Annis, J.; Evans, N. J.; Miller, B. J.; Palmeri, T. J., Thermodynamic integration and steppingstone sampling methods for estimating Bayes factors: A tutorial, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 89, 67-86 (2019)
[2] Brown, S. D.; Heathcote, A., The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation, Cognitive Psychology, 57, 3, 153-178 (2008)
[3] Bushmakin, M. A.; Eidels, A.; Heathcote, A., Breaking the rules in perceptual information integration, Cognitive Psychology, 95, 1-16 (2017)
[4] Coltheart, M.; Rastle, K.; Perry, C.; Langdon, R.; Ziegler, J., DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud, Psychological Review, 108, 1, 204-256 (2001)
[5] Cox, G. E.; Criss, A. H., Parallel interactive retrieval of item and associative information from event memory, Cognitive Psychology, 97, 31-61 (2017)
[6] Eidels, A.; Houpt, J. W.; Altieri, N.; Pei, L.; Townsend, J. T., Nice guys finish fast and bad guys finish last: Facilitatory vs. inhibitory interaction in parallel systems, Journal of mathematical psychology, 55, 2, 176-190 (2011) · Zbl 1231.91388
[7] Eidels, A.; Townsend, J. T.; Hughes, H. C.; Perry, L. A., Evaluating perceptual integration: Uniting response-time-and accuracy-based methodologies, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2, 659-680 (2015)
[8] Eriksen, C. W.; James, J. D.S., Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model, Perception & psychophysics, 40, 4, 225-240 (1986)
[9] Evans, N. J.; Annis, J., Thermodynamic integration via differential evolution: A method for estimating marginal likelihoods, Behavior Research Methods, 1-18 (2019)
[10] Evans, N. J.; Brown, S. D., Bayes factors for the linear ballistic accumulator model of decision-making, Behavior Research Methods, 50, 2, 589-603 (2018)
[11] Evans, N. J.; Brown, S. D.; Mewhort, D. J.; Heathcote, A., Refining the law of practice, Psychological Review, 125, 4, 592 (2018)
[12] Evans, N. J.; Howard, Z. L.; Heathcote, A.; Brown, S. D., Model flexibility analysis does not measure the persuasiveness of a fit, Psychological Review, 124, 3, 339 (2017)
[13] Evans, N. J.; Rae, B.; Bushmakin, M.; Rubin, M.; Brown, S. D., Need for closure is associated with urgency in perceptual decision-making, Memory & Cognition, 1-13 (2017)
[14] Fox, E. L.; Houpt, J. W., The perceptual processing of fused multi-spectral imagery, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1, 1, 31 (2016)
[15] Harding, B.; Goulet, M.-A.; Jolin, S.; Tremblay, C.; Villeneuve, S.-P.; Durand, G., Systems factorial technology explained to humans, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12, 1, 39-56 (2016)
[16] Holmes, W. R., A practical guide to the probability density approximation (pda) with improved implementation and error characterization, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 68, 13-24 (2015) · Zbl 1359.62501
[17] Houpt, J. W.; Blaha, L. M.; McIntire, J. P.; Havig, P. R.; Townsend, J. T., Systems factorial technology with R, Behavior Research Methods, 46, 2, 307-330 (2014)
[18] Houpt, J. W.; Fifić, M., A hierarchical Bayesian approach to distinguishing serial and parallel processing, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 79, 13-22 (2017) · Zbl 1396.91665
[19] Houpt, J. W.; Heathcote, A.; Eidels, A., Bayesian Analyses of cognitive architecture, Psychological Methods, 22, 2, 288 (2017)
[20] Houpt, J. W.; MacEachern, S. N.; Peruggia, M.; Townsend, J. T.; Van Zandt, T., Semiparametric Bayesian approaches to systems factorial technology, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 75, 68-85 (2016) · Zbl 1396.62265
[21] Johnson, S. A.; Blaha, L. M.; Houpt, J. W.; Townsend, J. T., Systems factorial technology provides new insights on global-local information processing in autism spectrum disorders, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 1, 53-72 (2010) · Zbl 1203.91257
[22] LaBerge, D.; Brown, V., Theory of attentional operations in shape identification, Psychological Review, 96, 1, 101 (1989)
[23] Little, D. R.; Eidels, A.; Fific, M.; Wang, T., Understanding the influence of distractors on workload capacity, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 68, 25-36 (2015) · Zbl 1354.91128
[24] Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process, Science, 189, 4198, 226-228 (1975)
[25] McClelland, J. L.; Elman, J. L., The TRACE model of speech perception, Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1, 1-86 (1986)
[26] Myung, I. J., The importance of complexity in model selection, Journal of mathematical psychology, 44, 1, 190-204 (2000) · Zbl 0946.62094
[27] Posner, M. I.; Snyder, C. R.; Davidson, B. J., Attention and the detection of signals, Journal of experimental psychology: General, 109, 2, 160 (1980)
[28] Ratcliff, R., A theory of memory retrieval, Psychological Review, 85, 2, 59-108 (1978)
[29] Roberts, S.; Pashler, H., How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing, Psychological Review, 107, 2, 358-367 (2000)
[30] Seidenberg, M. S.; McClelland, J. L., A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming, Psychological Review, 96, 4, 523 (1989)
[31] Shiffrin, R. M.; Lee, M. D.; Kim, W.; Wagenmakers, E.-J., A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods, Cognitive Science, 32, 1248-1284 (2008)
[32] Silverman, B. W., Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, vol. 26 (1986), CRC press · Zbl 0617.62042
[33] Sternberg, S., Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments, American Scientist, 57, 4, 421-457 (1969)
[34] Ter Braak, C. J., A Markov chain Monte Carlo version of the genetic algorithm differential evolution: easy Bayesian computing for real parameter spaces, Statistics and Computing, 16, 3, 239-249 (2006)
[35] Tillman, G., The racing diffusion model of speeded decision making (2017), Open Science Framework
[36] Tillman, G.; Benders, T.; Brown, S. D.; van Ravenzwaaij, D., An evidence accumulation model of acoustic cue weighting in vowel perception, Journal of Phonetics, 61, 1-12 (2017)
[37] Tillman, G.; Strayer, D.; Eidels, A.; Heathcote, A., Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 6, 1795-1803 (2017)
[38] Townsend, J. T., A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes, Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 3, 161-163 (1971)
[39] Townsend, J. T., Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 2, 168-199 (1972) · Zbl 0256.92014
[40] Townsend, J. T., Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 3, 219-238 (1976) · Zbl 0354.92053
[41] Townsend, J. T.; Eidels, A., Workload capacity spaces: A unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 4, 659-681 (2011)
[42] Townsend, J. T.; Fifić, M., Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high-speed search in human memory, Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 6, 953-962 (2004)
[43] Townsend, J. T.; Nozawa, G., Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 4, 321-359 (1995) · Zbl 0865.92029
[44] Townsend, J. T.; Wenger, M. J., The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 3, 391-418 (2004)
[45] Treisman, A. M.; Gelade, G., A feature-integration theory of attention, Cognitive Psychology, 12, 1, 97-136 (1980)
[46] Turner, B. M.; Sederberg, P. B., A generalized, likelihood-free method for posterior estimation, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 2, 227-250 (2014)
[47] Turner, B. M.; Sederberg, P. B.; Brown, S. D.; Steyvers, M., A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions, Psychological Methods, 18, 3, 368-384 (2013)
[48] Usher, M.; McClelland, J. L., The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model, Psychological Review, 108, 550-592 (2001)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.