##
**Field of iterated Laurent series and its Brauer group.**
*(English)*
Zbl 1452.16020

Let \(F\) be an infinite field, \(\mathrm{Br}(F)\) its Brauer group, \(p\) a prime number, \(_p\mathrm{Br}(F) = \{\beta \in\mathrm{Br}(F): p\beta = 0\}\), and \(\mathrm{Brd}_p(F)\) the Brauer \(p\)-dimension of \(F\), i.e., the supremum \(d \le \infty\) of those integers \(n \ge 0\), for which there exists a central division \(F\)-algebra \(\Delta\) of \(p\)-primary exponent exp\((\Delta)\) and degree deg\((\Delta) =\exp(\Delta)^n\). It is well known that if \(F\) contains a primitive \(p\)-th root of unity \(\rho\) and \(A\) is a cyclic \(F\)-algebra of degree \(p\), then \(A\) can be presented as \(F[x, y: x^p = \alpha, y^p = \beta, yx = \rho x, y]\), for some \(\alpha, \beta \in F^{\ast}\); we denote this presentation by \((\alpha, \beta)_{p,F}\). When \(\mathrm{char}(F) = p\), every cyclic \(F\)-algebra of degree \(p\) takes the form \([\alpha, \beta)_{p,F} = F \langle x, y: x^- x = \alpha, y^p = \beta, yxy^{-1} = x + 1 \rangle\), for some \(\alpha \in F\), \(\beta \in F^{\ast}\). These forms are called (Hilbert) symbol presentations of the algebras, and the algebras are also called symbol algebras. It is known that \(_p\mathrm{Br}(F)\) is generated by the Brauer equivalence classes of cyclic \(F\)-algebras of degree \(p\) in the following two cases: if \(F\) contains a primitive \(p\)-th root of unity (see [A. S. Merkur’ev and A. A. Suslin, Math. USSR, Izv. 21, 307–340 (1983; Zbl 0525.18008); translation from Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 46, No. 5, 1011–1046 (1982)]); if \(\mathrm{char}(F) = p\) (see Ch. VII, Theorem 28, in: [A. A. Albert, Structure of algebras. American Mathematical Society (AMS), Providence, RI (1939; JFM 65.0094.02)]). The symbol length \(\mathrm{Sym}(b_p)\) of an element of \(_p\mathrm{Br}(F)\) is the minimal number of symbol algebras needed to express it, and the symbol length of \(_p\mathrm{Br}(F)\) is the supremum \(\mathrm{Sym}_p(F)\) of \(\mathrm{Sym}(b_p): b_p \in{}_{p}\mathrm{Br}(F)\).

The main results of the paper under review are stated and proved in its Sections 3 and 4. They concern the special case where \(F = k_n := k((\alpha_1)) \dots ((\alpha_n))\) is the iterated Laurent formal power series field in \(n\) variables over a field \(k\). Theorem 3.5, the main result of Section 3, states that if \(k\) is a perfect field with \(\mathrm{char}(k) = p\), \(k_{sep}\) is a separable closure of \(k\), and \(m\) is the rank (as a pro-\(p\)-group) of the Galois group \(\mathcal{G}(k(p)/k)\) of the maximal \(p\)-extension \(k(p)\) of \(k\) in \(k_{\mathrm{sep}}\), then \(\mathrm{Sym}_p(F) = n - 1\), provided that \(m < n\), and \(\mathrm{Sym}_p(F) = n\) if \(m \ge n\). As noted by the author, this complements the known result (presented by Proposition 3.1 of the paper) that \(\mathrm{Sym}_{p'}(F) = [n/2]\) in case \(k\) is algebraically closed, \(p'\) is prime,and \(p' \neq\mathrm{char}(k)\). When \(n = 3\), these results indicate that \(\mathrm{Brd}_2(F) = 1\) if and only if \(\mathrm{char}(k) \neq 2\). This fact is generalized in Section 4 as follows: (i) If \(F = k_{n+1}\), where \(k\) is an algebraically closed field with \(\mathrm{char}(k) \neq 2\), then \(I^n F\) is linked, i.e., every two anisotropic bilinear \(n\)-fold Pfister forms over \(F\) share an \((n-1)\)-fold Pfister factor; (ii) when \(k\) is a field of characteristic \(2\) and \(F = k_{n+1}\), \(I_q^n F\) is not linked, i.e., there exists a pair of quadratic \(n\)-fold Pfister forms which do not share an \((n - 1)\)-fold Pfister factor; (iii) for any field \(F\) with \(\mathrm{char}(F) = 2\) and degree \([F: F^2] > 2^n\), \(I^n F\) is not linked, i.e., there exists a pair of anisotropic bilinear Pfister forms over \(F\), which do not share an \((n - 1)\)-fold factor.

Reviewer’s remark. Let \((F, v)\) be a Henselian valued field with a residue field \(\widehat F\), and let \(\mathrm{Br}(\widehat F)_{p}\) be the \(p\)-component of \(\mathrm{Br}(\widehat F)\). Then \(\mathrm{Brd}_p(F) = \mathrm{Sym}_p(F)\) in the following two cases: (i) if \(\mathrm{Br}(\widehat F)_p = \{0\}\) and \(\widehat F\) contains a primitive \(p\)-th root of unity (see (4.7), Theorem 2.3, and Corollary 5.6 of the reviewer’s paper in [J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223, No. 1, 10–29 (2019; Zbl 1456.16015)]; (ii) if \((F, v)\) is maximally complete, \([F: F^p] = p^n\), for some \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), and \(\widehat F\) is perfect (see Proposition 3.5 in the reviewer’s paper in: [Serdica Math. J. 44, 303–328 (2018)]). This recovers the proof of Proposition 3.1 and generalizes Theorem 3.5 of the paper under review to the case where \((F, v)\) is maximally complete with \(\mathrm{char}(F) = p\), \(\widehat F\) perfect and \([F: F^n] = p^n\).

The main results of the paper under review are stated and proved in its Sections 3 and 4. They concern the special case where \(F = k_n := k((\alpha_1)) \dots ((\alpha_n))\) is the iterated Laurent formal power series field in \(n\) variables over a field \(k\). Theorem 3.5, the main result of Section 3, states that if \(k\) is a perfect field with \(\mathrm{char}(k) = p\), \(k_{sep}\) is a separable closure of \(k\), and \(m\) is the rank (as a pro-\(p\)-group) of the Galois group \(\mathcal{G}(k(p)/k)\) of the maximal \(p\)-extension \(k(p)\) of \(k\) in \(k_{\mathrm{sep}}\), then \(\mathrm{Sym}_p(F) = n - 1\), provided that \(m < n\), and \(\mathrm{Sym}_p(F) = n\) if \(m \ge n\). As noted by the author, this complements the known result (presented by Proposition 3.1 of the paper) that \(\mathrm{Sym}_{p'}(F) = [n/2]\) in case \(k\) is algebraically closed, \(p'\) is prime,and \(p' \neq\mathrm{char}(k)\). When \(n = 3\), these results indicate that \(\mathrm{Brd}_2(F) = 1\) if and only if \(\mathrm{char}(k) \neq 2\). This fact is generalized in Section 4 as follows: (i) If \(F = k_{n+1}\), where \(k\) is an algebraically closed field with \(\mathrm{char}(k) \neq 2\), then \(I^n F\) is linked, i.e., every two anisotropic bilinear \(n\)-fold Pfister forms over \(F\) share an \((n-1)\)-fold Pfister factor; (ii) when \(k\) is a field of characteristic \(2\) and \(F = k_{n+1}\), \(I_q^n F\) is not linked, i.e., there exists a pair of quadratic \(n\)-fold Pfister forms which do not share an \((n - 1)\)-fold Pfister factor; (iii) for any field \(F\) with \(\mathrm{char}(F) = 2\) and degree \([F: F^2] > 2^n\), \(I^n F\) is not linked, i.e., there exists a pair of anisotropic bilinear Pfister forms over \(F\), which do not share an \((n - 1)\)-fold factor.

Reviewer’s remark. Let \((F, v)\) be a Henselian valued field with a residue field \(\widehat F\), and let \(\mathrm{Br}(\widehat F)_{p}\) be the \(p\)-component of \(\mathrm{Br}(\widehat F)\). Then \(\mathrm{Brd}_p(F) = \mathrm{Sym}_p(F)\) in the following two cases: (i) if \(\mathrm{Br}(\widehat F)_p = \{0\}\) and \(\widehat F\) contains a primitive \(p\)-th root of unity (see (4.7), Theorem 2.3, and Corollary 5.6 of the reviewer’s paper in [J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223, No. 1, 10–29 (2019; Zbl 1456.16015)]; (ii) if \((F, v)\) is maximally complete, \([F: F^p] = p^n\), for some \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), and \(\widehat F\) is perfect (see Proposition 3.5 in the reviewer’s paper in: [Serdica Math. J. 44, 303–328 (2018)]). This recovers the proof of Proposition 3.1 and generalizes Theorem 3.5 of the paper under review to the case where \((F, v)\) is maximally complete with \(\mathrm{char}(F) = p\), \(\widehat F\) perfect and \([F: F^n] = p^n\).

Reviewer: Ivan D. Chipchakov (Sofia)

### MSC:

16K20 | Finite-dimensional division rings |

16S35 | Twisted and skew group rings, crossed products |

16W60 | Valuations, completions, formal power series and related constructions (associative rings and algebras) |

11E81 | Algebraic theory of quadratic forms; Witt groups and rings |

11E04 | Quadratic forms over general fields |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{A. Chapman}, Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. - Simon Stevin 27, No. 1, 1--6 (2020; Zbl 1452.16020)

### References:

[1] | A. Albert.Structure of Algebras, volume 24 ofColloquium Publications. American Math. Soc., 1968. |

[2] | R. Aravire and B. Jacob.p-algebras over maximally complete fields. InK-theory and algebraic geometry: connections with quadratic forms and division algebras (Santa Barbara, CA, 1992), volume 58 ofProc. Sympos. Pure Math., pages 27-49. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1995. With an appendix by Jean-Pierre Tignol. |

[3] | A. Chapman. Common slots of bilinear and quadratic Pfister forms.Bull. Aust. Math. Soc., 98(1):38-47, 2018. · Zbl 1435.11073 |

[4] | A. Chapman and A. Dolphin.Differential forms, linked fields, and the u-invariant.Arch. Math. (Basel), 109(2):133-142, 2017. · Zbl 1427.11037 |

[5] | R. Elman, N. Karpenko, and A. Merkurjev.The algebraic and geometric theory of quadratic forms, volume 56 ofAmerican Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008. · Zbl 1165.11042 |

[6] | R. Elman and T. Y. Lam. Quadratic forms and theu-invariant. II.Invent. Math., 21:125-137, 1973. · Zbl 0267.10029 |

[7] | A. S. Merkurjev and A. A. Suslin.K-cohomology of Severi-Brauer varieties and the norm residue homomorphism.Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 46(5):1011-1046, 1135-1136, 1982. |

[8] | P. Morandi.The Henselization of a valued division algebra.J. Algebra, 122(1):232-243, 1989. · Zbl 0676.16017 |

[9] | J. |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.