zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

A comparison of shaper-based and shaper-free architectures for feedforward compensation of flexible modes. (English) Zbl 1447.93112
Valmorbida, Giorgio (ed.) et al., Delays and interconnections: methodology, algorithms and applications. Selected contributions of the 4th DelSys workshop, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, November 25–27, 2015. Cham: Springer. Adv. Delays Dyn. 10, 233-247 (2019).
Summary: Delay based reference shaping is a broadly used technique, very easy to implement and with good filtering properties. Guaranteeing the filtering property for input and output disturbances as well, motivated the developments of novel control architectures where delay based shapers appear in feedback loops as inverse shapers. Intuitively, one may ask to what extent the explicit inclusion of shapers is necessary, i.e., whether similar filtering properties could be induced by a suitable parameterization of the controller, which would have as additional advantage that the closed loop system would remain finite-dimensional. The aim of the chapter is to shed a light on this matter and provide answers. For this, a scheme with an inverse shaper is compared with a classical control scheme, where constraints on the location of the controller’s zeros are added in the design, in order to induce the filtering property. Both methods are presented with numerical examples, concluding with a discussion of the results. It is show, among others, that filtering is indeed possible by an appropriate controller design, but at the same time, major limitations appear, that further motivate the use of delay based shapers.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1431.93004].
93B52 Feedback control
93C43 Delay control/observation systems
Full Text: DOI
[1] Cole, M.O.: A discrete-time approach to impulse-based adaptive input shaping for motion control without residual vibration. Automatica 47(11), 2504-2510 (2011) · Zbl 1228.93068
[2] Hale, J.K., Lunel, S.M.V.: Strong stabilization of neutral functional differential equations. IMA J. Math. Control. Inf. 19(1 and 2), 5-23 (2002) · Zbl 1005.93026
[3] Hale, J.K., Lunel, S.M.V.: Introduction to Functional Differential Equations, vol. 99. Springer, Berlin (2013) · Zbl 0787.34002
[4] Hale, J.K., Lunel, S.V.: Stability and control of feedback systems with time delays. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 34(8-9), 497-504 (2003) · Zbl 1052.93028
[5] Huey, J.R., Singhose, W.: Trends in the stability properties of clss controllers: a root-locus analysis. IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol. 18(5), 1044-1056 (2010)
[6] Huey, J.R., Sorensen, K.L., Singhose, W.E.: Useful applications of closed-loop signal shaping controllers. Control Eng. Pract. 16(7), 836-846 (2008)
[7] Hung, J.Y.: Feedback control with posicast. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 50(1), 94-99 (2003)
[8] Michiels, W.: Spectrum-based stability analysis and stabilisation of systems described by delay differential algebraic equations. IET Control. Theory Appl. 5(16), 1829-1842 (2011)
[9] Michiels, W., Guglielmi, N.: An iterative method for computing the pseudospectral abscissa for a class of nonlinear eigenvalue problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34(4), A2366-A2393 (2012) · Zbl 1251.35061
[10] Overton, M.: Hanso: a hybrid algorithm for nonsmooth optimization. Available from https://cs.nyu.edu/overton/software/hanso/ (2009)
[11] Pilbauer, D., Michiels, W., Vyhlídal, T.: Distributed delay input shaper design by optimizing smooth kernel functions. TW Reports, volume TW663, 25 (2015) · Zbl 1395.93218
[12] Singhose, W.: Command shaping for flexible systems: a review of the first 50 years. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 10(4), 153-168 (2009)
[13] Smith, O.J.: Feedback Control Systems, pp. 331-345. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York (1958)
[14] Staehlin, U., Singh, T.: Design of closed-loop input shaping controllers. In: Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, vol. 6, pp. 5167-5172. IEEE (2003)
[15] Vyhlídal, T., Hromčík, M.: Parameterization of input shapers with delays of various distribution. Automatica 59, 256-263 (2015) · Zbl 1326.93053
[16] Vyhlídal, T., Hromčík, M., Kučera, V., Anderle, M.: Double oscillatory mode compensation by inverse signal shaper with distributed delays. In: Proceeding of 2014 European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 1121-1126. IEEE (2014)
[17] Vyhlídal, T., Hromčík, M., Kučera, V., Anderle, M.: On feedback architectures with zero vibration signal shapers. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. (2015) · Zbl 1359.93307
[18] Vyhlídal, T., Kuĉera, V., Hromĉík, M.: Input shapers with uniformly distributed delays. IFAC Proc. Vol. 45(14), 91-96 (2012) · Zbl 1391.93164
[19] Vyhlídal, T. · Zbl 1315.93033
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.