×

EXTRA: An expert system for multicriteria decision making. (English) Zbl 0725.90048

Summary: This paper presents an expert system approach to a classical decision making problem; aiding in the selection of a preferred action from a list of alternatives evaluated on several criteria. In outranking methods, the non-compensatory aggregation procedure uses an importance relation on criteria subsets. In EXTRA, the decision maker’s knowledge on this importance relation are treated purely formally, without converting them into weights. Therefore each outranking relation may be explained in terms of the input informations and of some simple axioms. Finally, the multicriteria analysis process is illustrated and studied on a real world problem: the media selection.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abgueguen, R., La sélection des supports de presse, (1971), Robert Laffon Paris
[2] Bouyssou, D.; Vansnick, J.-C., Noncompensatory and generalized noncompensatory preference structures, (1985), Cahier du LAMSADE, Université de Paris-Dauphine · Zbl 0605.90003
[3] Brans, J.P.; Mareschal, B.; Vincke, Ph., PROMETHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, () · Zbl 0571.90042
[4] Brans, J.P.; Vincke, Ph., A preference ranking organization method, the PROMETHEE method, Management science, 31, 647-656, (1985) · Zbl 0609.90073
[5] Clocksin, W.F.; Mellish, C.S., Programming in prolog, (1981), Springer Verlag New York · Zbl 0466.68009
[6] Cohen, S., Un système expert pour l’aide à la décision, ()
[7] Fishburn, P.C., Utility theory for decision making, (1970), Wiley New York · Zbl 0213.46202
[8] Fishburn, P.C., Noncompensatory preferences, Synthese, 33, 393-403, (1976) · Zbl 0357.90004
[9] Fishburn, P.C., Multiattribute nonlinear utility theory, Management science, 30, 1301-1310, (1985) · Zbl 0555.90008
[10] Gensch, D.H., Computer models in advertising media selection, Journal of marketing research, (Nov. 1968)
[11] Pasche, C., Une approche de l’analyse multicritère par LES systemes experts, Cahiers du CERO, 1-2, 49-60, (1987) · Zbl 0624.90050
[12] Pasche, C.; Lensch, R., Une approache de l’analyse multicritère par LES systems experts: description d’un moteur d’inférence spécialise, ()
[13] Roubens, M.; Vincke, Ph., Preference modelling, () · Zbl 0612.92020
[14] Roy, B., Classement et choix and présence de points de vue multiples, RAIRO-operations research, 8, 57-75, (1968)
[15] Roy, B.; Bertier, P., La méthode ELECTRE II, une application au média-planning, () · Zbl 0204.18903
[16] Roy, B.; Présent, M.; Silhol, D., A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated, European journal of operational research, 24, 318-334, (1986)
[17] Shocker, A.D., Limitations of incremental search in media selection, Journal of marketing research, (Feb. 1970)
[18] Skalka, J.M.; Bouyoussou, D.; Bernabeu, Y.A., ELECTRE III et IV; aspect méthodologique et guide d’utilisation, ()
[19] Solymosi, T.; Dombi, J., A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights, European journal of operational research, 26, 35-41, (1986)
[20] Siskos, J.; Wascher, G.; Winkels, H.M., A bibliography on outranking approaches (1966-1982), () · Zbl 0555.90095
[21] Turbo Prolog, TURBO PROLOG: the natural language of artificial intelligence, (1986), Borland International Scotts Valley, California
[22] Vansnick, J.-C., On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach), European journal of operational research, 24, 288-294, (1986) · Zbl 0579.90059
[23] Vansnick, J.-C., De Borda et concordet à l’agrégation multicritère, Ricerca operativa, 40, 1-40, (1986), (Milano)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.