×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Discussion: a comparison of GAMLSS with quantile regression. (English) Zbl 07257461
Summary: A discussion on the relative merits of quantile, expectile and GAMLSS regression models is given. We contrast the ‘complete distribution models’ provided by GAMLSS to the ‘distribution free models’ provided by quantile (and expectile) regression. We argue that in general, a flexibility parametric distribution assumption has several advantages allowing possible focusing on specific aspects of the data, model comparison and model diagnostics. A new method for concentrating only on the tail of the distributions is suggested combining quantile regression and GAMLSS.

MSC:
62 Statistics
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Aitkin, M (1987) Modelling variance heterogeneity in normal regression using glim. Applications Statistics, 36, 332-39.
[2] de Onis, Borghi E. (2006) Construction of the world health organization child growth standards: selection of methods for attained growth curves. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 247-65.
[3] Cole, TJ (1988) Fitting smoothed centile curves to reference data (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 151, 385-418.
[4] Cole, TJ, Green, PJ (1992) Smoothing reference centile curves: the lms method and penalized likelihood. Statistics in Medicine, 11, 1305-319.
[5] Dunn, PK, Smyth, GK (1996) Randomised quantile residuals. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 236-44.
[6] Engle, RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of united kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50, 987-1007. · Zbl 0491.62099
[7] Harvey, AC (1976) Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 41, 461-65. · Zbl 0333.62040
[8] Koenker, R (2012) quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 4.91.
[9] Lee, Y, Nelder, J, Pawitan, Y (2006) Generalized linear models with random effects: unified analysis via H-likelihood. London: CRC Press. · Zbl 1110.62092
[10] Lee, Y, Nelder, JA (2006) Double hierarchical generalized linear models (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C, 55, 139-85. · Zbl 05188732
[11] Mandelbrot, B (1997) Fractals and scaling in finance: discontinuity, concentration, risk: selecta volume E. New York: Springer Verlag. · Zbl 1005.91001
[12] Nelder, JA (1992) Joint modelling of the mean and dispersion. In Heijden, P G M Van der, Jansen, W, Francis, B J, Seeber, G U H (ed.) Statistical modelling, pp. 263-72.Amsterdam: North Holland.
[13] Nelder, JA, Pregibon, D (1987) An extended quasi-likelihood function. Biometrika, 74, 221-32. · Zbl 0621.62078
[14] Ng, P, Maechler, M (2007) A fast and efficient implementation of qualitatively constrained quantile smoothing splines. Statistical Modelling, 7(4), 315-28.
[15] Ng, PT, Maechler, M (2011) cobs: COBS—Constrained B-splines (Sparse matrix based). R package version 1.2-2.
[16] Rigby, RA, Stasinopoulos, DM (1996a) A semi-parametric additive model for variance heterogeneity. Statistics and Computing, 6, 57-65.
[17] Rigby, RA, Stasinopoulos, DM (1996b) Mean and dispersion additive models. In Hardle, W, Schimek, MG (ed.) Statistical theory and computational aspects of smoothing, pp. 215-30. Heidelberg: Physica.
[18] Rigby, RA, Stasinopoulos, DM (2004) Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box-Cox power exponential distribution. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 3053-76.
[19] Rigby, RA, Stasinopoulos, DM (2005) Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C, 54, 507-54. · Zbl 05188697
[20] Rigby, RA, Stasinopoulos, DM (2006) Using the Box-Cox \(t\) distribution in gamlss to model skewness and kurtosis. Statistical Modelling, 6, 209-29.
[21] Rigby, RA, Stasinopoulos, DM (2013) Automatic smoothing parameter selection in gamlss with an application to centile estimation. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Published online before print 01/02/2013. http://smm.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/01/16/0962280212473302.abstract
[22] Rigby, RA, Stasinopoulos, DM, Voudouris, V (2013) Methods for the ordering and comparison of theoretical distributions for parametric models in the presence of heavy tails. Internal Report, STORM, London Metropolitan University.
[23] Royston, P, Wright, EM (2000) Goodness-offit statistics for age-specific reference intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 2943-62.
[24] Rue, H, Held, L (2005) Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications, vol. 104. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC. · Zbl 1093.60003
[25] Schnabel, SK, Eilers, PHC (2013) Simultaneous estimation of quantile curves using quantile sheets. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 97, 77-87. · Zbl 1443.62107
[26] Sobotka, F, Schnabel, S, Schulze, Waltrup L (2012) Expectreg: Expectile and quantile regression. R package version 0.35.
[27] van, Buuren S, Fredriks, M (2001) Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modeling growth reference curves. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 1259-77.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.