zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

A Bayesian longitudinal model for quantifying students’ preferences regarding teaching quality indicators. (English) Zbl 1452.62974
Summary: The aim of the paper is to estimate the posterior mean values and analyze the posterior variation in students’ prioritization of teaching quality components within a 10-year frame. The results are based on longitudinal data gathered among Greek university students during the period of the national economic crisis in Greece spanned from 2009 to 2018. The analysis consists of fitting a Bayesian hierarchical beta regression model with a Dirichlet prior on the model coefficients that correspond to twenty quality attribute measures. Using this natural way to implement the usual constraints, the model coefficients can be interpreted as weights and thus they measure the relative importance that the students give to the different attributes. By estimating the posterior means and positioning measures of all consecutive sampling instances and summarizing posterior distributions of the differences between consecutive periods in the model weights, the study identifies and evaluates the major changes and patterns in students’ perception of academic quality over the ten-year sampling period.
Reviewer: Reviewer (Berlin)
62P25 Applications of statistics to social sciences
62J02 General nonlinear regression
62H11 Directional data; spatial statistics
65C05 Monte Carlo methods
Stan; WinBUGS
Full Text: DOI
[1] Akhlaghi, E.; Amini, S.; Akhlaghi, H., Evaluating educational service quality in technical and vocational colleges using servqual model, Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 46, 5285-5289 (2012)
[2] Balzano, S.; Trinchera, L.; Attanasio, M.; Capursi, V., Structural equation models and student evaluation of teaching: a PLS path modeling study, Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of University Systems, X, 55-66 (2011), New York: Springer, New York
[3] Betancourt, M.: A conceptual introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. arXiv:1701.02434v2 [stat.ME] (2017)
[4] Biemer, P.; Lyberg, L., Introduction to Survey Quality (2003), Hoboken: Wiley, Hoboken
[5] Carmichael, C.: Modelling student performance in a tertiary preparatory course, Master’s thesis, University of Southern Queensland, Australia (2006)
[6] Carpenter, B.; Gelman, A.; Hoffman, M.; Lee, D.; Goodrich, B.; Betancourt, M.; Brubaker, M.; Guo, J.; Li, P.; Riddell, A., Stan: a probabilistic programming language, J. Stat. Softw., 76, 1-32 (2017)
[7] Feldman, KA, The superior college teacher from the student’s view, Res. High. Educ., 5, 243-288 (1976)
[8] Ferrari, SLP; Cribari-Neto, F., Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions, J. Appl. Stat., 31, 799-815 (2004) · Zbl 1121.62367
[9] Fouskakis, D.; Petrakos, G.; Vavouras, I., A Bayesian hierarchical model for comparative evaluation of teaching quality indicators in higher education, J. Appl. Stat., 43, 195-211 (2016)
[10] Kuzmanovic, M.; Savic, G.; Popovic, M.; Martic, M., A new approach to evaluation of university teaching considering heterogeneity of students’ preferences, High. Educ., 66, 153-171 (2013)
[11] Lupo, T., A fuzzy SERVQUAL based method for reliable measurements of education quality in italian higher education area, Expert Syst. Appl., 40, 7096-7110 (2013)
[12] Marsh, HW, SEEQ: a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students’ evaluations of university teaching, Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 52, 77-95 (1982)
[13] Ntzoufras, I., Bayesian Modeling Using WinBUGS (2009), Hoboken: Wiley, Hoboken · Zbl 1218.62015
[14] Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, VA; Berry, LL, SERVQUAL: a multiple item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality, J. Retail., 64, 12-37 (1988)
[15] Peña, D.; Yohai, V., A Dirichlet random coefficient regression model for quality indicators, J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 136, 942-961 (2006) · Zbl 1077.62128
[16] Warton, DI; Hui, FKC, The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology, Ecology, 92, 3-10 (2011)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.