Optimal balance for rotating shallow water in primitive variables. (English) Zbl 1482.86012

Summary: Optimal balance is a near-optimal computational algorithm for nonlinear mode decomposition of geophysical flows into balanced and unbalanced components. It was first proposed as “optimal potential vorticity balance” by Á. Viúdez and D. G. Dritschel [J. Fluid Mech. 521, 343–352 (2004; Zbl 1065.76198)] in the specific setting of semi-Lagrangian potential vorticity-based numerical codes. Later, it was recognised as an instance of the more general principle of adiabatic invariance of fast degrees of motion under slow perturbations. From this point of view, the system is slowly deformed from a linearised configuration to the full nonlinear dynamics. In the former, linear analysis yields an exact separation of balanced and unbalanced flow. In the latter, a given base-point coordinate, e.g. the height or potential vorticity field, can be matched. This formulation leads to a boundary value problem in time. In this paper, we show that this more general viewpoint leads to practical implementations of optimal balance on top of a primitive variables (here, velocity-height variables) numerical code. We identify preferred choices for several design parameters. The most critical choices concern the linear projector onto the slow modes at the linear-end boundary and the choice of base-point coordinate at the nonlinear end. We find that, even though the evolutionary model is formulated in primitive variables, potential vorticity based end-point conditions are advantageous. In particular, the only universally robust linear projector is the oblique projector onto the Rossby modes along the gravity-wave modes, which can be interpreted as the distinct non-orthogonal projector onto the Rossby modes that preserves the linear potential vorticity. Hence, the projector can be formulated as an elliptic partial differential equation which holds promise for using the method to produce an accurate nonlinear mode decomposition for more general models without the need to resort to asymptotic analysis.


86A05 Hydrology, hydrography, oceanography
76U05 General theory of rotating fluids
86A10 Meteorology and atmospheric physics


Zbl 1065.76198


GitHub; PyRsw
Full Text: DOI


[1] Alexander, M. J.; Geller, M.; McLandress, C.; Polavarapu, S.; Preusse, P.; Sassi, F.; Sato, K.; Eckermann, S.; Ern, M.; Hertzog, A.; Kawatani, Y.; Pulido, M.; Shaw, T. A.; Sigmond, M.; Vincent, R.; Watanabe, S., Recent developments in gravity-wave effects in climate models and the global distribution of gravity-wave momentum flux from observations and models, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 136, 1103-1124 (2010)
[2] Auroux, D.; Nodet, M., The back and forth nudging algorithm for data assimilation problems: theoretical results on transport equations, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 18, 318-342 (2012) · Zbl 1252.65159
[3] Baer, F.; Tribbia, J., On complete filtering of gravity modes through nonlinear initialization, Mon. Wea. Rev., 105, 1536-1539 (1977)
[4] Çalık, M.; Oliver, M.; Vasylkevych, S., Global well-posedness for the generalized large-scale semigeostrophic equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 207, 969-990 (2013) · Zbl 1260.35132
[5] Cotter, C., Data assimilation on the exponentially accurate slow manifold, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 371 (2013) · Zbl 1353.86032
[6] Dritschel, D. G.; Ambaum, M. H., A contour-advective semi-Lagrangian numerical algorithm for simulating fine-scale conservative dynamical fields, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 1097-1130 (1997)
[7] Dritschel, D. G.; Gottwald, G. A.; Oliver, M., Comparison of variational balance models for the rotating shallow water equations, J. Fluid Mech., 822, 689-716 (2017) · Zbl 1383.76529
[8] Dritschel, D. G.; Polvani, L. M.; Mohebalhojeh, A. R., The contour-advective semi-Lagrangian algorithm for the shallow water equations, Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 1551-1565 (1999)
[9] Franzke, C. L.E.; Oliver, M.; Rademacher, J. D.M.; Badin, G.; Eden, C.; Iske, A., Multi-scale methods for geophysical flows, Energy Transfers in Atmosphere and Ocean, 1-51 (2019), Springer: Springer, Cham
[10] Gottwald, G. A.; Mohamad, H.; Oliver, M., Optimal balance via adiabatic invariance of approximate slow manifolds, Multiscale Model. Simul., 15, 1404-1422 (2017) · Zbl 1382.34056
[11] Kim, Y.; Eckermann, S. D.; Chun, H., An overview of the past, present and future of gravity-wave drag parametrization for numerical climate and weather prediction models, Atmos. Ocean, 41, 65-98 (2003)
[12] Lynch, P., The Emergence of Numerical Weather Prediction: Richardson’s Dream (2006), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press, New York · Zbl 1308.86001
[13] Machenhauer, B., On the dynamics of gravity oscillations in a shallow water model, with applications to normal mode initialization, Beitr. Phys. Atmos., 50, 253-271 (1977) · Zbl 0362.76040
[14] MacKay, R. S.; edited by Dauxois, T.; Litvak-Hinenzon, A.; MacKay, R. S.; Spanoudaki, A., Slow manifolds, Energy Localisation and Transfer, 149-192 (2004), World Scientific: World Scientific, Singapore
[15] McIntyre, M. E.; Roulstone, I.; Norbury, J.; Roulstone, I., Are there higher-accuracy analogues of semi-geostrophic theory?, Large-scale Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics, 2, 301-364 (2002), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
[16] McIntyre, M.; Pyle, J.; Zhang, F., Dynamical meteorology – balanced flow, Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, 298-303 (2015), Academic Press: Academic Press, Oxford
[17] McIntyre, M. E.; Norton, W. A., Potential vorticity inversion on a hemisphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1214-1235 (2000)
[18] Mohebalhojeh, A. R.; Dritschel, D. G., Hierarchies of balance conditions for the f-plane shallow-water equations, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2411-2426 (2001)
[19] Oliver, M., Variational asymptotics for rotating shallow water near geostrophy: a transformational approach, J. Fluid Mech., 551, 197-234 (2006) · Zbl 1086.76074
[20] Poulin, F.J., PyRsw: Python rotating shallow water model, GitHub repository, GitHub, commit c504456, https://github.com/PyRsw/PyRsw. 2016.
[21] Salmon, R., Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (1998), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press, New York
[22] Vallis, G. K., Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics: Fundamentals and Large-scale Circulation (2017), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 1374.86002
[23] Vanneste, J., Balance and spontaneous wave generation in geophysical flows, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 45, 147-172 (2013) · Zbl 1359.76068
[24] Viúdez, A.; Dritschel, D. G., Optimal potential vorticity balance of geophysical flows, J. Fluid Mech., 521, 343-352 (2004) · Zbl 1065.76198
[25] von Storch, J. S.; Badin, G.; Oliver, M.; Eden, C.; Iske, A., The interior energy pathway: inertial gravity wave emission by oceanic flows, Energy Transfers in Atmosphere and Ocean, 53-85 (2019), Springer: Springer, Cham
[26] Warn, T.; Bokhove, O.; Shepherd, T.; Vallis, G., Rossby number expansions, slaving principles, and balance dynamics, Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 121, 723-739 (1995)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.