##
**Quantum invariants at the sixth root of unity.**
*(English)*
Zbl 0779.57007

The authors give a formula which expresses the \(SU(2)\)-quantum invariant of a closed oriented 3-manifold at a sixth root of unity in terms of homology, Witt-invariants and signature defects of 2-fold covers. (Evaluations at the third and fourth roots of unity were given in [Invent. Math. 105, No. 3, 473-545 (1991; Zbl 0745.57006)].)

More precisely, \[ T_ 6(M)=\sum_{\theta \in H^ 1(M,\mathbb{Z}_ 2)} \tau_ 6 (M, \theta), \] where \(\tau_ 6(M,\theta)=\sqrt 3^{\varepsilon(\theta)+d(M_ \theta)-d(M)}i^{-w(M)+2 \theta^ 3+\text{def}_ 3(\theta) } \) . Here \(\varepsilon(\theta)=0\) or 1 according \(\theta\) is zero or not, \(d(M)=rk(H^ 1(M,\mathbb{Z}_ 3))\) and \(2\theta^ 3\) is the image in \(\mathbb{Z}_ 4\) of the cup cube of \(\theta\) under multiplication by \(2:H^ 3(M,\mathbb{Z}_ 2)\to H^ 1(M,\mathbb{Z}_ 4)\). \(w(M)\) is the mod 3-Witt invariant of \(M\), which is defined as follows: Let \(W\) be a compact oriented 4-manifold bounded by \(M\) and let \(A(W)\) be its intersection form. Then \(w_{A(W)} \in\mathbb{Z}_ 4\) is the mod 3 Witt class of \(A(W)\), which is computed by diagonalizing \(A(W) \text{mod} 3\) with diagonal entries from \(\{0,1,-1\}\) and then taking the trace. Then \(w(M) : = \sigma_{A(W)}-w_{A(W)}\text{mod} 4\), where \(\sigma_{A(W)}\) is the signature. Finally let \(M_ \theta\to M\) be the 2-fold covering determined by \(\theta\). Let \(\widetilde W\to W\) be a cyclic cover of oriented 4-manifolds extending \(M_ \theta\to M\) branched along a closed surface \(F\) in \(W\). Then \[ \text{def}_ 3(\theta):=mw_{A(W)}-w_{A(\widetilde W)}-{m^ 2-1\over 2m}F\cdot F\text{mod} 4. \] It is pointed out that \(\tau_ 6(M)=\tau_ 6(M,0)\) for each \(\mathbb{Z}_ 2\)-homology sphere and then \(\tau_ 6(M)=\sqrt 3^{d(M)}i^{-w(M)}\), in particular \(\tau_ 6(M)=1\) for \(\mathbb{Z}\)- homology spheres. The question whether \(\tau_ 6\) is a homotopy invariant is related to the homotopy invariance of Witt defects resp. signature defects. Finally the range of \(\tau_ 6(M,\theta)\) is determined, and \(\tau_ 6\) is explicitly computed for lens spaces.

More precisely, \[ T_ 6(M)=\sum_{\theta \in H^ 1(M,\mathbb{Z}_ 2)} \tau_ 6 (M, \theta), \] where \(\tau_ 6(M,\theta)=\sqrt 3^{\varepsilon(\theta)+d(M_ \theta)-d(M)}i^{-w(M)+2 \theta^ 3+\text{def}_ 3(\theta) } \) . Here \(\varepsilon(\theta)=0\) or 1 according \(\theta\) is zero or not, \(d(M)=rk(H^ 1(M,\mathbb{Z}_ 3))\) and \(2\theta^ 3\) is the image in \(\mathbb{Z}_ 4\) of the cup cube of \(\theta\) under multiplication by \(2:H^ 3(M,\mathbb{Z}_ 2)\to H^ 1(M,\mathbb{Z}_ 4)\). \(w(M)\) is the mod 3-Witt invariant of \(M\), which is defined as follows: Let \(W\) be a compact oriented 4-manifold bounded by \(M\) and let \(A(W)\) be its intersection form. Then \(w_{A(W)} \in\mathbb{Z}_ 4\) is the mod 3 Witt class of \(A(W)\), which is computed by diagonalizing \(A(W) \text{mod} 3\) with diagonal entries from \(\{0,1,-1\}\) and then taking the trace. Then \(w(M) : = \sigma_{A(W)}-w_{A(W)}\text{mod} 4\), where \(\sigma_{A(W)}\) is the signature. Finally let \(M_ \theta\to M\) be the 2-fold covering determined by \(\theta\). Let \(\widetilde W\to W\) be a cyclic cover of oriented 4-manifolds extending \(M_ \theta\to M\) branched along a closed surface \(F\) in \(W\). Then \[ \text{def}_ 3(\theta):=mw_{A(W)}-w_{A(\widetilde W)}-{m^ 2-1\over 2m}F\cdot F\text{mod} 4. \] It is pointed out that \(\tau_ 6(M)=\tau_ 6(M,0)\) for each \(\mathbb{Z}_ 2\)-homology sphere and then \(\tau_ 6(M)=\sqrt 3^{d(M)}i^{-w(M)}\), in particular \(\tau_ 6(M)=1\) for \(\mathbb{Z}\)- homology spheres. The question whether \(\tau_ 6\) is a homotopy invariant is related to the homotopy invariance of Witt defects resp. signature defects. Finally the range of \(\tau_ 6(M,\theta)\) is determined, and \(\tau_ 6\) is explicitly computed for lens spaces.

Reviewer: U.Kaiser (Siegen)

### MSC:

57N10 | Topology of general \(3\)-manifolds (MSC2010) |

81T25 | Quantum field theory on lattices |

57M25 | Knots and links in the \(3\)-sphere (MSC2010) |

### Keywords:

\(SU(2)\)-quantum invariant; closed oriented 3-manifold; sixth root of unity; Witt-invariants; signature defects of 2-fold covers; mod 3-Witt invariant; homotopy invariance; lens spaces### Citations:

Zbl 0745.57006### References:

[1] | [AK] Akbulut, S., Kirby, R.: Branched covers of surfaces in 4-manifold. Math. Ann.252, 111–131 (1980) · doi:10.1007/BF01420118 |

[2] | [AS] Atiyah, M.F., Singer, I.M.: The index of elliptic operators. III. Ann. Math.87, 546–604 (1968) · Zbl 0164.24301 · doi:10.2307/1970717 |

[3] | [CG] Casson, A.J., Gordon, C.McA.: On slice knots in dimension three. In: Geometric Topology. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. XXXII, Providence, RI: Am. Math. Soc. 1976, pp. 39–53 |

[4] | [H] Hirzebruch, F.: The signature theorem: Reminiscences and recreation. In: Prospects in Math. Ann. Math. Studies70, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press 1971, pp. 3–31 · Zbl 0252.58009 |

[5] | [K] Kirby, R.C.: A calculus for framed links inS 3. Invent. Math.45, 35–56 (1978) · Zbl 0377.55001 · doi:10.1007/BF01406222 |

[6] | [KM1] Kirby, R., Melvin, P.: Evaluations of the 3-manifold invariants of Witten and Reshetikhin-Turaev forsl(2, C). In: Geometry of Low-Dimensional Manifolds. London Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser.151, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press 1990, pp. 473–545 |

[7] | [KM2] Kirby, R., Melvin, P.: The 3-manifold invariants of Witten and Reshetikhin-Turaev forsl(2, C). Invent. Math.105, 473–545 (1991) · Zbl 0745.57006 · doi:10.1007/BF01232277 |

[8] | [KM3] Kirby, R., Melvin, P.: Dedekind sums, {\(\mu\)}-invariants and the signature cocycle. Invent. Math. (to appear) · Zbl 0809.11027 |

[9] | [MH] Milnor, J., Husemoller, D.: Symmetric Bilinear Forms. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1973 · Zbl 0292.10016 |

[10] | [RT] Reshetikhin, N.Yu., Turaev, V.G.: Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups. Invent. Math.103, 547–597 (1991) · Zbl 0725.57007 · doi:10.1007/BF01239527 |

[11] | [W] Witten, E.: Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial. Commun. Math. Phys.121, 351–399 (1989) · Zbl 0667.57005 · doi:10.1007/BF01217730 |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.