zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Missing data, imputation, and the bootstrap. (With comments). (English) Zbl 0806.62033
The paper presents a (partially informal) discussion of various bootstrap methods designed for the statistical analysis of data with possibly missing values: the nonparametric bootstrap, the full mechanism and the multiple imputation bootstrap. The first utilizes resampling from the available (incomplete) data. The full mechanism requires knowledge of the concealment mechanism transforming the original data ${\bold x}$ into the observations ${\bold o}$, while for the multiple imputation bootstrap one needs, in a Bayesian framework, knowledge of the conditional densities $f({\bold x}\vert{\bold o})$. In his comment, {\it D. Rubin} comes to the conclusion that “Efron can be read as implying that confidence intervals based on the nonparametric bootstrap are valid whether or not the imputation method tracks the actual mechanism that created the missing data”. This reviewer also has the impression that some further clarifying remarks would have been worthwhile, namely that the validity of each choice of a bootstrap heavily depends on having specified the correct model.

62G09Nonparametric statistical resampling methods
Full Text: DOI