zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Simulating normalizing constants: From importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling. (English) Zbl 0966.65004
Summary: Computing (ratios of) normalizing constants of probability models is a fundamental computational problem for many statistical and scientific studies. Monte Carlo simulation is an effective technique, especially with complex and high-dimensional models. This paper aims to bring to the attention of general statistical audiences of some effective methods originating from theoretical physics and at the same time to explore these methods from a more statistical perspective, through establishing theoretical connections and illustrating their uses with statistical problems. We show that the acceptance ratio method and thermodynamic integration are natural generalizations of importance sampling, which is most familiar to statistical audiences. The former generalizes importance sampling through the use of a single “bridge” density and is thus a case of bridge sampling in the sense of {\it X.-L. Meng} and {\it W. H. Wong} [Stat. Sin. 6, No. 4, 831-860 (1996; Zbl 0857.62017)]. Thermodynamic integration, which is also known in the numerical analysis literature as {\it Y. Ogata}’s method for high-dimensional integration [Numer. Math. 55, No. 2, 137-157 (1989; Zbl 0669.65011)], corresponds to the use of infinitely many and continuously connected bridges (and thus a “path”). Our path sampling formulation offers more flexibility and thus potential efficiency to thermodynamic integration, and the search of optimal paths turns out to have close connections with the Jeffreys prior density and the Rao and Hellinger distances between two densities. We provide an informative theoretical example as well as two empirical examples (involving 17- to 70-dimensional integrations) to illustrate the potential and implementation of path sampling. We also discuss some open problems.

65C40Computational Markov chains (numerical analysis)
65C05Monte Carlo methods
60J22Computational methods in Markov chains
spatial; tsbridge
Full Text: DOI
[1] Atkinson, C. and Mitchell, A. F. S. (1981). Rao’s distance measure. Sankhy?a Ser. A 43 345-365. · Zbl 0534.62012
[2] Bennett, C. H. (1976). Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data. J. Comput. Phy s. 22 245-268. · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(76)90078-4
[3] Berg, B. and Celik, T. (1992). New approach to spin-glass simulations. Phy s. Rev. Lett. 69 2292-2295.
[4] Berg, B. and Neuhaus, T. (1991). Multicanonical algorithms for the first order phase transitions. Phy s. Lett. B 267 249-253.
[5] Besag, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice sy stems (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 36 192-236. JSTOR: · Zbl 0327.60067 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0035-9246%281974%2936%3A2%3C192%3ASIATSA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3&origin=euclid
[6] Binder, K. (1986). Introduction: theory and technical aspects of Monte Carlo simulations. In Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical physics (K. Binder, ed.). Topics in Current physics 7. Springer, Berlin.
[7] Boscardin, W. J. and Gelman, A. (1996). Bayesian regression with parametric models for heteroscedasticity. Advances in Econometrics 11A 87-109.
[8] Burbea, J. (1989). Rao distance. In Ency clopedia of Statistical Science, supplement volume, 128-130. Wiley, New York.
[9] Ceperley, D. M. (1995). Path integrals in the theory of condensed helium. Rev. Modern Phy s. 67 279-355. Chen, M.-H. and Shao, Q. M. (1997a). On Monte Carlo methods for estimating ratios of normalizing constants. Ann. Statist. 25 1563-1594. Chen, M.-H. and Shao, Q. M. (1997b). Estimating ratios of normalizing constants for densities with different dimensions. Statist. Sinica 7 607-630.
[10] Chib, S. (1995). Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90 1313-1321. JSTOR: · Zbl 0868.62027 · doi:10.2307/2291521 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0162-1459%28199512%2990%3A432%3C1313%3AMLFTGO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2&origin=euclid
[11] Ciccotti, G. and Hoover, W. G., eds. (1986). MolecularDy namics Simulation of Statistical-Mechanical Sy stems. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[12] Courant, R. and Hilbert, D. (1961). Methods of Mathematical physics 2. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 57.0245.01
[13] Dempster, A. P., Selwy n, M. R. and Weeks, B. J. (1983). Combining historical and randomized controls for assessing trends in proportions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 78 221-227. DiCiccio, T. J., Kass, R. E., Raftery, A. and Wasserman, L. JSTOR: · Zbl 0514.62112 · doi:10.2307/2288616 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0162-1459%28198306%2978%3A382%3C293%3ABMFCTR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23&origin=euclid
[14] . Computing Bay es factors by combining simulation and asy mptotic approximations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.. 92 903-915. JSTOR: · Zbl 1050.62520 · doi:10.2307/2965554 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0162-1459%28199709%2992%3A439%3C903%3ACBFBCS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G&origin=euclid
[15] Evans, M. and Swartz, T. (1995). Methods for approximating integrals in statistics with special emphasis on Bayesian integration problems. Statist. Sci. 10 254-272. · Zbl 0955.62553 · doi:10.1214/ss/1177009938
[16] Frankel, D. and Smit, B. (1996). Understanding Molecular Simulation. Academic Press, New York. · Zbl 0889.65132
[17] Frenkel, D. (1986). Free-energy computation and first-order phase transition. In Molecular-Dy namics Simulation of Statistical-Mechanical Sy stems (G. Ciccotti and W. G. Hoover, eds.) 151-188. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[18] Gelfand, A. E. and Dey, D. K. (1994). Bayesian model choice: asy mptotic and exact calculations. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 56 501-514. JSTOR: · Zbl 0800.62170 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0035-9246%281994%2956%3A3%3C501%3ABMCAAE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A&origin=euclid
[19] Gelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 85 398-409. JSTOR: · Zbl 0702.62020 · doi:10.2307/2289776 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0162-1459%28199006%2985%3A410%3C398%3ASATCMD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3&origin=euclid
[20] Gelman, A., King, G. and Boscardin, J. (1998). Estimating the probability of events that have never occurred: when is your vote decisive? J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 93 1-9. · Zbl 0920.62005 · doi:10.2307/2669597
[21] Gelman, A. and Meng, X. L. (1994). Path sampling for computing normalizing constants: identities and theory. Technical Report 376, Dept. Statistics, Univ. Chicago.
[22] Gelman, A., Roberts, G. O. and Gilks, W. R. (1996). Efficient Metropolis jumping rules. In Bayesian Statistics 5 (J. O. Berger, J. M. Bernardo, D. V. Lindley and A. F. M. Smith, eds.) 599-607. Oxford Univ. Press.
[23] Gelman, A. and Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion). Statist. Sci. 7 457-511. · Zbl 0767.62021
[24] Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analy sis and Machine Intelligence 6 721-741. · Zbl 0573.62030 · doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
[25] Gey er, C. J. (1991). Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. In Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Sy mposium on the Interface (E. M. Keramidas, ed.) 156-163. Interface Foundation, Fairfax Station, VA.
[26] Gey er, C. J. (1994). Estimating normalizing constants and reweighting mixtures in Markov chain Monte Carlo. Technical Report 568, School of Statistics, Univ. Minnesota.
[27] Gey er, C. J. and Thompson, E. A. (1992). Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 54 657-699. JSTOR: · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0035-9246%281992%2954%3A3%3C657%3ACMCMLF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J&origin=euclid
[28] Gey er, C. J. and Thompson, E. A. (1995). Annealing Markov chain Monte Carlo with applications to ancestral inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90 909-920. · Zbl 0850.62834 · doi:10.2307/2291325
[29] Green, P. J. (1992). Discussion of ”Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data” by C. J. Gey er and E. A. Thompson. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 54 683-684. · Zbl 0949.47013
[30] Hastings, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57 97- 109. · Zbl 0219.65008 · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
[31] Irwin, M., Cox, N. and Kong, A. (1994). Sequential imputation for multilocus linkage analysis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91 11684-11688.
[32] Jensen, C. S. and Kong, A. (1998). Blocking Gibbs sampling for linkage analysis in large pedigrees with many loops. American Journal of Human Genetics.
[33] Kass, R. E. and Vos, P. W. (1997). Geometry Foundations of Asy mptotic Inference. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0880.62005
[34] Kong, A., Liu, J. and Wong, W. H. (1994). Sequential imputations and Bayesian missing data problems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89 278-288. · Zbl 0800.62166 · doi:10.2307/2291224
[35] Lewis, S. M. and Raftery, A. E. (1997). Estimating Bay es factors via posterior simulation with Laplace-Metropolis estimator. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92 648-663. JSTOR: · Zbl 0889.62018 · doi:10.2307/2965712 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0162-1459%28199706%2992%3A438%3C648%3AEBFVPS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B&origin=euclid
[36] Marinari, E. and Parisi, G. (1992). Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme. Europhy s. Lett. 19 451-458.
[37] Meng, X. L. and Schilling, S. (1996). Fitting full-information factor models and an empirical investigation of bridge sampling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 1254-1267. · Zbl 0925.62220 · doi:10.2307/2291744
[38] Meng, X. L. and Wong, W. H. (1996). Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity: a theoretical exploration. Statist. Sinica 6 831-860. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., · Zbl 0857.62017
[39] Teller, A. H. and Teller, E. (1953). Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical physics 21 1087-1092.
[40] Mitchell, A. F. S. (1992). Estimative and predictive distances. Test 1 105-121. · Zbl 0764.62026 · doi:10.1007/BF02562666
[41] Neal, R. M. (1993). Probabilistic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Technical Report CRG-TR-93-1, Dept. Computer Science, Univ. Toronto.
[42] Newton, M. A. and Raftery, A. E. (1994). Approximate Bayesian inference and the weighted likelihood bootstrap (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 56 3-48. JSTOR: · Zbl 0788.62026 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0035-9246%281994%2956%3A1%3C3%3AABIWTW%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F&origin=euclid
[43] Ogata, Y. (1989). A Monte Carlo method for high dimensional integration. Numer. Math. 55 137-157. · Zbl 0669.65011 · doi:10.1007/BF01406511 · eudml:133348
[44] Ogata, Y. (1990). A Monte Carlo method for an objective Bayesian procedure. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 42 403-433. · Zbl 0719.65098 · doi:10.1007/BF00049299
[45] Ogata, Y. (1994). Evaluation of Bayesian visualization modelsTwo computational methods. Research Memorandum 503, Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Toky o.
[46] Ogata, Y. and Tanemura, M. (1984). Likelihood analysis of spatial point patterns. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 46 496-518. JSTOR: · Zbl 0579.62087 · http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0035-9246%281984%2946%3A3%3C496%3ALAOSPP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6&origin=euclid
[47] Ott, J. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation by counting methods under poly genic and mixed models in human pedigrees. American Journal of Human Genetics 31 161-175.
[48] Raftery, A. E. (1996). Hy pothesis testing and model selection via posterior simulation. In Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (W. Gilks, S. Richardson and D. J. Spiegelhalter, eds) 163-187. Chapman and Hall, London. · Zbl 0841.62019
[49] Rao, C. R. (1945). Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. 37 81-91. · Zbl 0063.06420
[50] Rao, C. R. (1949). On the distance between two populations. Sankhy?a 9 246-248.
[51] Ripley, B. D. (1988). Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes. Cambridge Univ. Press. · Zbl 0716.62100
[52] Stein, M. (1992). Prediction and inference for truncated spatial data. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 1 91-110.
[53] Thompson, E. A. (1996). Likelihood and linkage: from Fisher to the future. Ann. Statist. 24 449-465. · Zbl 0856.62101 · doi:10.1214/aos/1032894448
[54] Torrie, G. M. and Valleau, J. P. (1977). Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: umbrella sampling. J. Comput. Phy s. 23 187-199.