×

Logic and the discursive intellect. (English) Zbl 0968.03518

Summary: The effort to fit simple logical truths – like ‘if it’s either red or green and it’s not red, then it must be green’ – into Kant’s account of knowledge turns up a position more subtle and intriguing than might be expected at first glance.

MSC:

03A05 Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Allison, H., The Kant-Eberhard Controversy , Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1973.
[2] Allison, H., Kant’s Transcendental Idealism , Yale University Press, New Haven, 1983.
[3] Beck, L. W., “Kant’s letter to Marcus Hertz, February 21, 1772,” pp. 54–60, in Studies in the Philosophy of Kant , Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1965.
[4] Beck, L. W., “Can Kant’s synthetic judgments be made analytic?,” pp. 3–22, in Kant: A Collection of Critical Essays , edited by R. P. Wolff, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1968.
[5] Beck, L.W., “Foreword,” pp. xi–xx in K. Reich, The Completeness of Kant’s Table of Judgments , translated by J. Kneller and M. Losonsky, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1992.
[6] de Vleeschauwer, H.-J., The Development of Kantian Thought: the History of a Doctrine , translated by A. R. C. Duncan, Thomas Nelson and Sons, London, 1962. (The 1939 French edition of this book is a condensation of Vleeschauwer’s La Déduction transcendentale dans l’oeuvre de Kant , 3 volumes, Paris, Leroux, 1934–37.)
[7] Ellington, J., “The unity of Kant’s thought in his philosophy of corporeal nature,” pp. 135–219, in Philosophy of Material Nature, Hackett, Indianapolis, 1985.
[8] Gödel, K., “Some observations about the relationship between theory of relativity and Kantian philosophy,” pp. 230–59 in Collected Works , vol. 3, edited by S. Feferman et al., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
[9] Kant, I., Critique of Judgment , translated by W. S. Pluhar, Hackett, Indianapolis, 1987. · Zbl 0714.90057
[10] Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason , translated by N. K. Smith, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1965.
[11] Kant, I., “The Dohna-Wundlacken Logic,” pp. 425–516 in Lectures on Logic , translated by J. M. Young, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
[12] Kant, I., “To Marcus Hertz, February 21, 1772,” pp. 70–76, in Kant: Philosophical Correspondence , translated and edited by A. Zweig, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1967.
[13] Kant, I., “The Jäsche Logic,” pp. 517–640 in Lectures on Logic , translated by J. M. Young, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
[14] Kant, I., “On a discovery according to which any new critique of pure reason has been made superfluous by an earlier one,” pp. 105–60 in H. Allison, The Kant-Eberhard Controversy , Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1973.
[15] Kant, I., Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics , translated by L. W. Beck, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1950.
[16] Kitcher, P., Kant’s Transcendental Psychology , Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.
[17] Longuenesse, B., Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason , Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997.
[18] Maddy, P., “Naturalism and the a priori,” forthcoming in New Essays on the A Priori , edited by P. Boghossian and C. Peacocke, Oxford Univeristy Press, Oxford. · Zbl 0962.00514
[19] Melnick, A., Kant’s Analogies of Experience , University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973. · Zbl 0259.94009
[20] Reich, K., The Completeness of Kant’s Table of Judgments , translated by J. Kneller and M. Losonsky, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1992.
[21] Tonelli, G., Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason within the Tradition of Modern Logic , edited by D. H. Chandler, George Olms, Zurich, 1994.
[22] Wilson, M., “Can we trust logical form?,” Journal of Philosophy , vol. 91 (1994), pp. 519–44. JSTOR: · doi:10.2307/2940801
[23] Wilson, M., “Inference and correlational truth,” pp. 371–95 in Circularity, Definition and Truth , edited by A. Chapuis and A. Gupta, Indian Council of Philosophical Research, New Delhi, 2000.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.