zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Examples
Geometry Search for the term Geometry in any field. Queries are case-independent.
Funct* Wildcard queries are specified by * (e.g. functions, functorial, etc.). Otherwise the search is exact.
"Topological group" Phrases (multi-words) should be set in "straight quotation marks".
au: Bourbaki & ti: Algebra Search for author and title. The and-operator & is default and can be omitted.
Chebyshev | Tschebyscheff The or-operator | allows to search for Chebyshev or Tschebyscheff.
"Quasi* map*" py: 1989 The resulting documents have publication year 1989.
so: Eur* J* Mat* Soc* cc: 14 Search for publications in a particular source with a Mathematics Subject Classification code (cc) in 14.
"Partial diff* eq*" ! elliptic The not-operator ! eliminates all results containing the word elliptic.
dt: b & au: Hilbert The document type is set to books; alternatively: j for journal articles, a for book articles.
py: 2000-2015 cc: (94A | 11T) Number ranges are accepted. Terms can be grouped within (parentheses).
la: chinese Find documents in a given language. ISO 639-1 language codes can also be used.

Operators
a & b logic and
a | b logic or
!ab logic not
abc* right wildcard
"ab c" phrase
(ab c) parentheses
Fields
any anywhere an internal document identifier
au author, editor ai internal author identifier
ti title la language
so source ab review, abstract
py publication year rv reviewer
cc MSC code ut uncontrolled term
dt document type (j: journal article; b: book; a: book article)
Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. (English) Zbl 0970.90038
Summary: Simultaneous consideration of multiple financial ratios is required to adequately evaluate and rank the relative performance of competing companies. This paper formulates the inter-company comparison process as a multi-criteria analysis model, and presents an effective approach by modifying TOPSIS for solving the problem. The modified TOPSIS approach can identify the relevance of the financial ratios to the evaluation result, and indicate the performance difference between companies on each financial ratio. To ensure that the evaluation result is not affected by the inter-dependence of the financial ratios, objective weights are used. As a result, the comparison process is conducted on a commonly accepted basis and is independent of subjective preferences of various stakeholders. An empirical study of a real case in China is conducted to illustrate how the approach is used for the inter-company comparison problem. The result shows that the approach can reflect the decision information emitted by the financial ratios used. The comparison of objective weighting methods suggests that, with the modified TOPSIS approach, the entropy measure compares favourably with other methods for the case study conducted.

MSC:
90B50Management decision making, including multiple objectives
90B05Inventory, storage, reservoirs
WorldCat.org
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Barnes, A.: The analysis and use of financial ratios: a review article. Journal of business and finance accounting 14, 449-461 (1987)
[2] Davis E, Kay J. Assessing corporate performance. Business Strategy Review 1990; Summer: 1--16.
[3] Van Der Wijst, D.: Modelling interfirm comparisons in small business. Omega 18, 123-129 (1990)
[4] Diakoulaki, D.; Mavrotas, G.; Papayannakis, L.: A multicriteria approach for evaluating the performance of industrial firms. Omega 20, 467-474 (1992)
[5] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal operational research 2, 429-444 (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080
[6] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Sun, D. B.; Huang, Z. M.: Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial bank. Journal of econometrics 46, 73-91 (1990) · Zbl 0712.90015
[7] Doyle, J. R.; Green, R. H.: Comparing products using data envelopment analysis. Omega 19, 631-638 (1991)
[8] Smith, P.: Data envelopment analysis applied to financial statements. Omega 18, 131-138 (1990)
[9] Stewart, T. J.: Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision analysis. Journal of operational research society 47, 654-665 (1996) · Zbl 0863.90006
[10] Boussofiane, A.; Dyson, R. G.; Thanassoulis, E.: Applied data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research 52, 1-15 (1991) · Zbl 0928.90063
[11] Hwang CL, Yoon KS. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer, 1981.
[12] Olson DL. Decision aids for selection problems. New York: Springer, 1996.
[13] Zeleny M. Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982. · Zbl 0588.90019
[14] Saaty TL. Decision making for leaders. 3rd ed. New York: RWS Publications, 1995.
[15] Barron, F. H.; Barrett, B. E.: Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management science 42, 1515-1523 (1996) · Zbl 0879.90002
[16] Hobbs, B. F.: A comparison of weighting methods in power plant citing. Decision sciences 11, 725-737 (1978)
[17] Schoemaker, P. J. H.; Waid, C. D.: An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive utility models. Management science 28, 182-196 (1982)
[18] Fischer, G. W.: Range sensitivity of attribute weights in multiattribute value model. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 62, 252-266 (1995)
[19] Mareschal, B.: Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. European journal of operational research 33, 54-64 (1988) · Zbl 0634.90074
[20] Triantaphyllou, E.; Sanchez, A.: A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision making methods. Decision sciences 28/1, 151-194 (1997)
[21] Ribeiro, R. A.: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques. Fuzzy sets and systems 78, 155-181 (1996) · Zbl 0869.90083
[22] Yeh CH, Willis RJ, Deng H, Pan H. Task oriented weighting in multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 1999;119/1:in press. · Zbl 0934.91013
[23] Diakoulaki, D.; Mavrotas, G.; Papayannakis, L.: Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method. Computers and operations research 22, 763-770 (1995) · Zbl 0830.90079
[24] Shannon CE, Weaver, W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: The University of Illinios Press, 1947.
[25] Shipley, M. F.; De Korvin, A.; Obid, R.: A decision making model for multi-attribute problems incorporating uncertainty and bias measures. Computers and operations research 18, 335-342 (1991)
[26] Makridakis S, Wheelwright SC, McGee VE. Forecasting: methods and applications. New York: Wiley, 1983.