Švejdar, Vítězslav On the polynomial-space completeness of intuitionistic propositional logic. (English) Zbl 1025.03030 Arch. Math. Logic 42, No. 7, 711-716 (2003). Summary: We present an alternative, purely semantical and relatively simple, proof of the Statman’s result that both intuitionistic propositional logic and its implicational fragment are PSPACE-complete. Cited in 1 ReviewCited in 6 Documents MSC: 03D15 Complexity of computation (including implicit computational complexity) 68Q17 Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) 03B20 Subsystems of classical logic (including intuitionistic logic) Keywords:intuitionistic logic; nonclassical logics; decision problem; polynomial space; Kripke models; logical connectives × Cite Format Result Cite Review PDF Full Text: DOI References: [1] De\(\sim\)Jongh, D.H.J., Veltman, F.: Intensional Logic. Lecture notes. Philosophy Department, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1988 [2] Ladner, R.: The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal logic. SIAM Journal of Computing 6(3), 467–480 (1977) · Zbl 0373.02025 · doi:10.1137/0206033 [3] Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1994 · Zbl 0833.68049 [4] Spaan, E.: Complexity of modal logics. Dissertation, Faculty of mathematics and informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1993 · Zbl 0831.03005 [5] Statman, R.: Intuitionistic propositional logic is polynomial-space complete. Theoretical Comput. Sci. 9, 67–72 (1979) · Zbl 0411.03049 · doi:10.1016/0304-3975(79)90006-9 [6] Takeuti, G.: Proof Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975 · Zbl 0354.02027 [7] Van Dalen, D.: Intuitionistic logic. In: D. Gabbay, F. Guenthner eds, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, number\(\sim\)164–167 in Synthese Library, Chapter III.4, pp. 225–340. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1986 This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.