Hall, Peter; Kang, Kee-Hoon Bootstrapping nonparametric density estimators with empirically chosen bandwidths. (English) Zbl 1043.62028 Ann. Stat. 29, No. 5, 1443-1468 (2001). Summary: We examine the way in which empirical bandwidth choice affects distributional properties of nonparametric density estimators. Two bandwidth selection methods are considered in detail: local and global plug-in rules. Particular attention is focussed on whether the accuracy of distributional bootstrap approximations is appreciably influenced by using the resample version \(\widehat{h}^*\), rather than the sample version \(\widehat{h}\), of an empirical bandwidth. It is shown theoretically that, in marked contrast to similar problems in more familiar settings, no general first-order theoretical improvement can be expected when using the resampling version. In the case of local plug-in rules, the inability of the bootstrap to accurately reflect biases of the components used to construct the bandwidth selector means that the bootstrap distribution of \(\widehat{h}^*\) is unable to capture some of the main properties of the distribution of \(\widehat{h}\).If the second derivative component is slightly undersmoothed then some improvements are possible through using \(\widehat{h}^*\), but they would be difficult to achieve in practice. On the other hand, for global plug-in methods, both \(\widehat{h}\) and \(\widehat{h}^*\) are such good approximations to an optimal, deterministic bandwidth that the variations of either can be largely ignored, at least at a first-order level. Thus, for quite different reasons in the two cases, the computational burden of varying an empirical bandwidth across resamples is difficult to justify. Cited in 10 Documents MSC: 62G07 Density estimation 62G09 Nonparametric statistical resampling methods 65C60 Computational problems in statistics (MSC2010) 62G15 Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions 62G20 Asymptotic properties of nonparametric inference Keywords:Edgeworth expansions; kernel methods; second-order accuracy; smoothing parameter; rate of convergence Software:bootstrap; bootlib; KernSmooth × Cite Format Result Cite Review PDF Full Text: DOI References: [1] Davison, A. C. and Hinkley, D. J. (1997). Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications. Cambridge Univ. Press · Zbl 0886.62001 [2] Efron, B. and Tibshirani, B. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman andHall, London. · Zbl 0835.62038 [3] Faraway, J. J. and Jhun, M. (1990). Bootstrap choice of bandwidth for density estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 85 1119-1122. JSTOR: · doi:10.2307/2289609 [4] Hall, P. (1986). On the number of bootstrap simulations requiredto construct a confidence interval. Ann. Statist. 14 1453-1462. · Zbl 0611.62048 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176350169 [5] Hall, P. (1991). Edgeworth expansions for nonparametric density estimators, with applications. Math. Operat. Statistik Ser. Statist. 22 215-232. Hall, P. (1992a). The Bootstrapand Edgeworth Expansion. Springer, New York. Hall, P. (1992b). Effect of bias estimation on coverage accuracy on bootstrap confidence intervals for a probability density. Ann. Statist. 20 675-694. · Zbl 0809.62031 · doi:10.1080/02331889108802305 [6] Hall, P. (1993). On Edgeworth expansion and bootstrap confidence bands in nonparametric curve estimation. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 55 291-304. · Zbl 0780.62040 [7] Hall, P. and Marron, J. S. (1987). Estimation of integratedsquareddensity derivatives. Statist. Probab. Lett. 6 109-115. [Correction (1988) Statist. Probab. Lett. 7 87.] · Zbl 0628.62029 [8] Hall, P. and Titterington, D. M. (1989). The effect of simulation order on level accuracy and power of Monte Carlo tests. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 51 459-467. JSTOR: · Zbl 0699.62020 [9] Marron, J. S. and Wand, M. P. (1992). Exact mean integratedsquarederror. Ann. Statist. 20 712-736. · Zbl 0746.62040 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176348653 [10] Scott, D. J. (1992). Multivariate Density Estimation-Theory, Practice, and Visualization. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0850.62006 [11] Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman andHall, London. · Zbl 0617.62042 [12] Taylor, C. C. (1989). Bootstrap choice of the smoothing parameter in kernel density estimation. Biometrika 76 705-712. JSTOR: · Zbl 0678.62042 · doi:10.1093/biomet/76.4.705 [13] Wand, M. P. and Jones, M. C. (1995). Kernel Smoothing. Chapman andHall, London. · Zbl 0854.62043 This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.