×

Causal inference for complex longitudinal data: the continuous case. (English) Zbl 1043.62094

Summary: We extend J. Robins’ theory of causal inference for complex longitudinal data [see Lect. Notes Stat. 120, 69–117 (1997; Zbl 0969.62072)] to the case of continuously varying as opposed to discrete covariates and treatments. In particular we establish versions of the key results of the discrete theory: the \(g\)-computation formula and a collection of powerful characterizations of the \(g\)-null hypothesis of no treatment effect. This is accomplished under natural continuity hypotheses concerning the conditional distributions of the outcome variable and of the covariates given the past. We also show that our assumptions concerning counterfactual variables place no restriction on the joint distribution of the observed variables: thus in a precise sense, these assumptions are “for free”, or if you prefer, harmless.

MSC:

62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
62E10 Characterization and structure theory of statistical distributions

Citations:

Zbl 0969.62072

Software:

TETRAD

References:

[1] Chang, J. and Pollard, D. (1997). Conditioning as disintegration. Statist. Neerlandica 51 287-317. · Zbl 0889.62003 · doi:10.1111/1467-9574.00056
[2] Cox, D. (1958). The design and planning of experiments. Chapman and Hall, London. · Zbl 0084.15802
[3] Lok, J. (2001). Statistical modelling of causal effects in time. Ph.D. thesis, Free Univ., Amsterdam. Available at www.cs.vu.nl/ jjlok. URL:
[4] Neyman, J. (1923). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: essay on principles, Sec. 9. Translated and reprinted in Statist. Sci. 5 465-480. · Zbl 0955.01560
[5] Pearl, J. (1995). Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 82 669-688. JSTOR: · Zbl 0860.62045 · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669
[6] Pollard, D. (2001). User’s Guide to Measure-theoretic Probability. Cambridge Univ. Press. · Zbl 0992.60001
[7] Robins, J. (1986). A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods-application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math. Modelling 7 1393-1512. · Zbl 0614.62136 · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6
[8] Robins, J. (1987). Addendum to ”a new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods-application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect.” Comput. Math. Appl. 14 923-945. · Zbl 0643.62062 · doi:10.1016/0898-1221(87)90238-0
[9] Robins, J. (1989). The analysis of randomized and nonrandomized AIDS treatment trials using a new approach to causal inference in longitudinal studies. In Health Service Research Methodology: A Focus on AIDS (L. Sechrest, H. Freeman and A. Mulley, eds.) 113-159.
[10] NCHSR, U.S. Public Health Service, Washington, DC.
[11] Robins, J. (1997). Causal inference from complex longitudinal data. Latent Variable Modeling and Applications to Causality. Lecture Notes in Statist. 120 69-117. Springer, Berlin. · Zbl 0969.62072
[12] Robins, J. and Wasserman, L. (1997). Estimation of effects of sequential treatments by reparameterizing directed acyclic graphs. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, (D. Geiger and P. Shenoy, eds.) 409-420. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
[13] Rubin, D. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatment in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educational Psychology 66 688-701.
[14] Rubin, D. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Ann. Statist. 6 34-58. · Zbl 0383.62021 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344064
[15] Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. and Scheines, R. (1993). Causation, Prediction, and Search. Springer, New York. · Zbl 0806.62001
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.