Trimmed trees and embedded particle systems. (English) Zbl 1048.60063

A superprocess \({\mathcal X}=({\mathcal X}_t)_{t\geq 0}\) taking on values in the space \({\mathcal M}(E)\) of finite measures on some space \(E\) can be rather often related with a branching particle process \(X=(X_t)_{t\geq 0}\) by the formula \[ P^{{\mathcal L}(\text{Pois} (\mu))}[X_t\in\cdot]=P^\mu[ \text{Pois} ({\mathcal X}_t)\in\cdot],\quad t\geq 0,\,\mu\in{\mathcal M}(E), \] where \(\text{Pois}({\mathcal X}_t)\) denotes a Poisson point measure with random intensity \({\mathcal X}_t\) and \(P^{{\mathcal L}(\text{Pois} (\mu))} \) denotes the law of the process \(X\) started with the initial law \({\mathcal L}( \text{Pois} (\mu)).\) This relation holds, for instance, when \({\mathcal X}\) is the standard critical continuous super-Brownian motion in \(R^d\) which corresponds to the evolution equation \(\frac{{\partial}}{{\partial} t}u_t=\frac{1}{2} \Delta u_t-u_t^2\) and \(X\) is a system of binary Brownian motions with branching rate 1 and death rate 1. One can say that \(X\) can be obtained from \({\mathcal X}\) by Poissonization.
The authors investigate Poissonization relations for a class of continuous superprocesses on compacta with Feller underlying motion and describe conditions under which a superprocess \({\mathcal X}\) and a branching particle system \(X\) can be coupled as processes in such a way that \[ P[X_t\in\cdot\mid ({\mathcal X}_s)_{0\leq s\leq t}]=P[\text{Pois} (h{\mathcal X}_t)\in\cdot\mid {\mathcal X}_t] \text{ a.s. }\forall t\geq 0, \] where \(h\) is a sufficiently smooth density.


60J80 Branching processes (Galton-Watson, birth-and-death, etc.)
60J60 Diffusion processes
60K35 Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory
60G57 Random measures
Full Text: DOI arXiv


[1] Bourbaki, N. (1958). Éléments de Mathématique , 2nd ed., Book 3, Chap. 9. Hermann and Cie, Paris.
[2] Dawson, D. A. (1993). Measure-valued Markov processes. École d’Été de Probabilités de Saint Flour XXI. Lecture Notes in Math. 1541 1–260. Springer, Berlin. · Zbl 0799.60080
[3] Dawson, D. A. and Perkins, E. A. (1991). Historical Processes. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI. · Zbl 0754.60062
[4] Doob, J. L. (1984). Classical Potential Theory and Its Probabilistic Counterpart. Springer, New York. · Zbl 0549.31001
[5] Dynkin, E. B. (1965). Markov Processes 1 , 2 . Springer, Berlin. · Zbl 0132.37901
[6] Engländer, J. and Kyprianou, A. E. (2004) Local extinction versus local exponential growth for spatial branching processes. Ann. Probab. 32 78–99. · Zbl 1056.60083
[7] Engländer, J. and Pinsky, R. G. (1999). On the construction and support properties of measure-valued diffusions on \(D\subseteq\RR^d\) with spatially dependent branching. Ann. Probab. 27 684–730. · Zbl 0979.60078
[8] Etheridge, A. M. (2000). An Introduction to Superprocesses. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI. · Zbl 0971.60053
[9] Ethier, S. N. and Kurtz, T. G. (1986). Markov Processes : Characterization and Convergence. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0592.60049
[10] Fitzsimmons, P. J. (1988). Construction and regularity of measure-valued branching processes. Israel J. Math. 64 337–361. · Zbl 0673.60089
[11] Fitzsimmons, P. J.(1991). Correction to “Construction and regularity of measure-valued branching processes.” Israel J. Math. 73 127. · Zbl 0731.60075
[12] Fitzsimmons, P. J. (1992). On the martingale problem for measure-valued Markov branching processes. In Seminar on Stochastic Processes 1991 (E. Çinlar, K. L. Chung and M. J. Sharpe, eds.) 39–51. Birkhäuser, Boston. · Zbl 0768.60072
[13] Fleischmann, K. and Prehn, U. (1975) Subkritische räumlich homogene Verzweigungsprozesse. Math. Nachr. 70 231–250. · Zbl 0288.60071
[14] Fleischmann, K. and Swart, J. (2003). Extinction versus exponential growth in a supercritical super-Wright–Fischer diffusion. Stochastic Process Appl. 106 141–165. · Zbl 1075.60567
[15] Fukushima, M. and Stroock, D. (1986). Reversibility of solutions to martingale problems. In Probability , Statistical Mechanics , and Number Theory (G.-C. Rota, ed.) 107–123. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. · Zbl 0613.60066
[16] Getoor, R. K. (1975). Markov processes : Ray Processes and Right Processes. Lecture Notes in Math. 440 . Springer, Berlin. · Zbl 0299.60051
[17] Gorostiza, L. G., Roelly-Coppoletta, S. and Wakolbinger, A. (1990). Sur la persistence du process de Dawson Watanabe stable (l’inversion de la limite en temps et de la renormalisation). Séminaire de Probabilités XXIV. Lecture Notes in Math. 1426 275–281. Springer, Berlin. · Zbl 0702.60052
[18] Kerstan, J. Matthes, K. and Mecke, J. (1982). Infinitely Divisible Point Processes . Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian.) · Zbl 0521.60056
[19] Klenke, A. (1998). Clustering and invariant measures for spatial branching models with infinite variance. Ann. Probab. 26 1057–1087. · Zbl 0938.60086
[20] Kurtz, T. G. (2000). Particle representations for measure-valued population processes with spatially varying birth rates. In Stochastic Models. (L. G. Gorostiza and B. G. Ivanoff, eds.). Amer. Math. Soc. Providence, RI. · Zbl 0960.60069
[21] Matthes, K., Kerstan, J. and Mecke, J. (1978). Infinitely Divisible Point Processes . Wiley, Chichester. · Zbl 0383.60001
[22] Pazy, A. (1983). Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations. Springer, New York. · Zbl 0516.47023
[23] Schwartz, L. (1973). Radon Measures on Arbitrary Topological Spaces and Cylindical Measures . Oxford Univ. Press. · Zbl 0298.28001
[24] Sharpe, M. (1988). General Theory of Markov Processes . Academic Press, Boston. · Zbl 0649.60079
[25] Skorohod, A. V. (1956). Limit theorems for stochastic processes. Theory Probab. Appl. 1 261–290. · Zbl 0074.33802
[26] Winter, A. (2002). Multiple scale analysis of spatial branching processes under the Palm distribution. Electron. J. Probab. 7 1–70. · Zbl 1010.60077
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.