Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ. (English) Zbl 1064.90557

Summary. QFD (Quality Function Deployment) has been used to reflect the needs of customers in products, while TRIZ (a Russian acronym for Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) was developed to assist engineers in finding innovative solutions to technical problems in product development processes. However, no method has been proposed to integrate QFD with TRIZ effectively. This report describes a new method, named the Innovative Product Development Process (IPDP), which systematically integrates QFD with TRIZ and enables the effective and systematic creation of technical innovation for new products. In IPDP, the target products’ functions and mechanisms are deployed in parallel into hierarchical structures, and the mechanism that most requires technical innovation is specified from an analysis of customers’ needs by calculating a mechanism weight. Then, the technical problems to be solved are defined by considering the relationship between the specified mechanism and corresponding functions or quality characteristics, and technical innovation is executed by applying TRIZ. The effectiveness of IPDP was confirmed by applying it to the technical innovation of a washing machine.


90B60 Marketing, advertising
Full Text: DOI


[1] AKAO Y., Quality Function Deployment (1990)
[2] ALTSHULLER H., And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared (1996)
[3] BOSSERT J. L., Quality Function Deployment, A Practitioner’s Approach (1991)
[4] CLAUSING D., Total Quality Development (1994)
[5] DOMB, E. QFD and TIPS/TRIZ. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on QFD. Linkoping, Sweden.
[6] HAUSER J. R., Harvard Business Review pp 63– (1988)
[7] KLINE S. J., The Positive Sum Strategy (1986)
[8] KOWALICK, J. A. 1996. ”Use of functional analysis and pruning, with TRIZ and ARIZ, to solve ’Impossible-to-solve Problems”. http://www.triz-journal.eom/archives/1996/12/d/ index.html
[9] KOWALICK, J. A. Problem-solving systems: what’s next after TRIZ? Proceedings of The 4th Annual International TPD Symposiwn-TRIZ Conference. California. pp.67–86.
[10] NIEUWKUYK, M. J. and ROGOSCH, D. S. Confirming expert judgement through correlation. Transactions from The Ninth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment. Michigan. pp.351–363.
[11] OFUJI T., Quality Function Deployment Manual (1990)
[12] PUGH, S. Concept selection-a method that works. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design. Rome. pp.479–506.
[13] ROYZEN Z., Transactions from The Ninth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, June, Michigan pp 441– (1997)
[14] SAATY T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1990) · Zbl 0707.90002
[15] SOUDEK W., Managing New Product Innovations (1987)
[16] SUH N. P., The Principles of Design (1990)
[17] TERNINKO J., Transactions from the Ninth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, Michigan pp 187– (1997)
[18] UNGVARI S. F., Transactions from The Ninth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, June, Michigan pp 427– (1997)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.